I went ahead and "updated" the PKGBUILD because namcap reports "custom: " in the license field as wrong ALBEIT the Pcakge Guidelines published in the wiki declare otherwise...sigh.
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:43 AM <nmlibertar...@gmail.com> wrote: > RE: Orphan request for trustedqsl - PRQ#60221 > > In fact this package already conforms to the Package Guidelines, as > currently published: > > " > For custom licenses the identifier should be either > LicenseRef-license-name or custom:license-name, if they are not covered by > the common families mentioned above. The corresponding license text must be > placed in directory /usr/share/licenses/pkgname. To install the file a > following code snippet may be used in package() section: > > install -Dm644 LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE" > " > > Please DO NOT orphan this package. > > TIA > > not_anonymous > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:13 AM <not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Coelacanthus [1] filed an orphan request for trustedqsl [2]: >> >> This package doesn't follow licenses section of Package Guideline and >> RFC 16. I submitted a comment on AUR but received no response or >> update for four months. >> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license >> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx- >> license-identifiers.rst >> <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx-license-identifiers.rst> >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Coelacanthus/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/trustedqsl/ > >
