RE: Orphan request for trustedqsl - PRQ#60221

In fact this package already conforms to the Package Guidelines, as
currently published:

"
For custom licenses the identifier should be either LicenseRef-license-name
or custom:license-name, if they are not covered by the common families
mentioned above. The corresponding license text must be placed in directory
/usr/share/licenses/pkgname. To install the file a following code snippet
may be used in package() section:

install -Dm644 LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE"
"

Please DO NOT orphan this package.

TIA

not_anonymous


On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:13 AM <not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:

> Coelacanthus [1] filed an orphan request for trustedqsl [2]:
>
> This package doesn't follow licenses section of Package Guideline and
> RFC 16. I submitted a comment on AUR but received no response or
> update for four months.
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license
> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx-
> license-identifiers.rst
> <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx-license-identifiers.rst>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Coelacanthus/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/trustedqsl/

Reply via email to