On 2023-07-09 19:36:45, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> @Arvedui, I think you are not subscribed to the aur-requests mailing list. Or
> you are sending your mails from an unsubscribed address/alias.
Thanks, and yes I'am not subscribed to aur-requests. That is not
necessary according to [0]. Though I di
In my (limited) experience, moderator's approval can take up to a week or more.
And meanwhile, discussions go on, decisions get taken, and TU's and community
members who are not directly addressed in To/CC/BCC do not see your responses
in a timely manner.
So I would still recommend that you sub
@Arvedui, I think you are not subscribed to the aur-requests mailing list. Or
you are sending your mails from an unsubscribed address/alias.
So far I only see my messages and @Muflone's:
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/search?q=43953&page=1&mlist=aur-requests%40lists.archlinux.org&sort=date
Seems like an unintended human 'race condition' arose...
There were no comments or votes, so if the package gets pushed back, everything
will be the same except the submission/update dates.
On 9 July 2023 18:05:35 GMT+02:00, Muflone wrote:
>Hi
>
>
>> Request #43953 has been Rejected by MarsSeed
Hi
Request #43953 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Revoking the request, please kindly disregard.
Maintainer @Arvedui explained that this package is still useful, e.g.
for personal, local scripts created for customization, if some of them
still rely on the Python2 module.
[1] https://aur.a
Request #43953 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Revoking the request, please kindly disregard.
Maintainer @Arvedui explained that this package is still useful, e.g.
for personal, local scripts created for customization, if some of them
still rely on the Python2 module.
[1] https://aur.archlinu
