On 9/5/24 3:42 PM, Jaron Kent-Dobias wrote:
On Thursday, 5 September 2024 at 15:36 (-0500), David C. Rankin wrote:
I was curious about the frequency that packages in extra and core are
installed by Arch users. Is that metadata captured anywhere and is there any
way a user can query it?
Check
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:36:12PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All, Devs,
>
> I was curious about the frequency that packages in extra and core are
> installed by Arch users. Is that metadata captured anywhere and is there any
> way a user can query it?
>
pkgstats [1] [2] ?
[1] https://arc
On 9/5/24 3:49 PM, pitastrudl wrote:
As far as I'm aware from a mirrors standpoint there is no way of knowing the
frequency of installment as all packages are mirrored from T0 and then spread
out to other mirrors that are out of our observation. Since T0 is just
accessed by T1s, that is not a u
On 9/5/24 10:36 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
All, Devs,
I was curious about the frequency that packages in extra and core
are installed by Arch users. Is that metadata captured anywhere and is
there any way a user can query it?
What sparked this curiosity is that I follow the package feeds
On Thursday, 5 September 2024 at 15:36 (-0500), David C. Rankin wrote:
I was curious about the frequency that packages in extra and core
are installed by Arch users. Is that metadata captured anywhere and is
there any way a user can query it?
Check out pkgstats: https://pkgstats.archlinux.de/
All, Devs,
I was curious about the frequency that packages in extra and core are
installed by Arch users. Is that metadata captured anywhere and is there any
way a user can query it?
What sparked this curiosity is that I follow the package feeds closely
checking for version changes I may
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Often snippets are sufficient, so that a pasting service is not
> necessary. But if one should become necessary, it would be
> unfavourable in my opinion if you had to copy one and the same thing
> from one pasting service to another.
PS:
O
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 17:42 +0200, Rein Fernhout (Levitating) wrote:
> [snip] So I do a agree with Polarian that we should first consider "do
> we want a pasting service" [snip]
Hi,
how often is a pasting service really required, when reporting an issue
that might or might not be a packaging issu
The main issues the way I see it are:
Moderation - How would we prevent spam/abuse? Pastebins can quickly be
subject to spam, scams, abuse and more.
Lifetime - Especially if there will be more than just text, it will eat
up resources quickly. Though, even with just text it can take up a lot
of s
I sent this message yesterday but I accidentally forgot to add the
mailing list as a recipient.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Arch Linux public upload server
Date: 2024-09-04 14:28
From: "Rein Fernhout (Levitating)"
To: Robin Candau
On 2024-09-04 09:56, Robin Candau wrote:
Hello again,
Frankly, I find the topic of discussion brought up in the last 3-4 emails
to be counterproductive and off-topic from what I intended to discuss in
this thread. That being said, I’d like to thank Robin Candau for steering
the conversation in the right direction and clarifying some of
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 10:11 +0200, Robin Candau wrote:
> I'm aware you said you intend no offense (and I'm not doubting that)
> but, frankly, implying that Orhun acted with its personal interest in
> mind when proposing to offer an instance of his paste service to users
> under the Arch infra/dom
On 9/5/24 3:28 AM, Polarian wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I don't think it was ever mentioned that such a paste service offered
by Arch Linux would become *the official one* and that its usage
would be enforced in any way when requesting support or something (in
opposition to other similar services)
13 matches
Mail list logo
