On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 17:42 +0200, Rein Fernhout (Levitating) wrote: > [snip] So I do a agree with Polarian that we should first consider "do > we want a pasting service" [snip]
Hi, how often is a pasting service really required, when reporting an issue that might or might not be a packaging issue? Recently I reported a bug against the krita package. It has undoubtedly turned out to be an upstream issue. Fortunately, no pasting service was necessary upstream in this case either. If it had been necessary and I had to use a pasting service, would I have been able to provide a link to an Arch pasting service to upstream, or would I have had to make it available again via another pasting service? Often snippets are sufficient, so that a pasting service is not necessary. But if one should become necessary, it would be unfavourable in my opinion if you had to copy one and the same thing from one pasting service to another. Regards, Ralf
