Re: [arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

2020-10-07 Thread Mathias Anselmann via arch-general
Hi, I also asked me that question some time ago... boost 1.72 was flagged out of date on 2020-04-28, but is still in the repos. Since then 1.73 was released on 2020-04-28 1.74 was released on 2020-08-14 Greetings Mathias Am 07.10.20 um 23:58 schrieb karx via arch-general: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020

Re: [arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

2020-10-07 Thread Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general
Hi, The package has been market out of date for quite some time now (almost 4 months) [0]. One release has now actually been skipped (1.73). -- Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io [0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/boost/

Re: [arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

2020-10-07 Thread Levente Polyak via arch-general
On October 7, 2020 11:58:52 PM GMT+02:00, karx via arch-general wrote: >On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general < >arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: >How long has the updated version been available? If it was just >released >then it will take some time for it to get packag

Re: [arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

2020-10-07 Thread karx via arch-general
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Is there a reason why boost libraries are stuck to version 1.72 when > 1.74 are already available? I cannot find anything on the bug tracker. > > Thank you. > > -- > Best > Jayesh Badwaik > Hi,

Re: [arch-general] Update Groff version to 1.22.4

2019-01-01 Thread Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general
Apologies Eli, I really didn't mean to make a nuisance of myself on the list. I only punted the patch here because there was no maintainer listed in the PKGBUILD. Since I saw similar patches doing the rounds on the other OS mailing lists I'm subscribed to, I thought I'd submit mine here. On sec

Re: [arch-general] Update Groff version to 1.22.4

2018-12-30 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 12/30/18 8:49 PM, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote: > Ping? Pong. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pong > On 2018-12-25 02:11:24, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote: >> This patch updates groff to version 1.22.4, which was released >> yesterday. I had to change th

Re: [arch-general] Update Groff version to 1.22.4

2018-12-30 Thread Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general
Ping? On 2018-12-25 02:11:24, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote: > This patch updates groff to version 1.22.4, which was released > yesterday. I had to change the PGP key from Werner to Bertrand, and I > also removed some lingering whitespace. > > OK? > -- > Stephen Gregoratto > PGP Fi

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:59:07 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: >At least Eli took time to explain what actually went wrong. He also took the time to send a _signed_ mail off-list to me. I am afraid he's rather unwell. Calling me names :D and he's completely lost in a biased fantasy world

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Leonid Isaev via arch-general
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:38:12 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as > >> wise and psychologic

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:38:12 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: >On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as >> wise and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt that anybody >> of us is able to lea

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Leonid Isaev via arch-general
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as wise > and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt that anybody of us is > able to learn from your wise comments, more likely we laugh at you, > because we are psy

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:33 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> I have run Arch on it since 2009 -- I'm familiar with what it does. > >Just using a thing often used by intelligent, computer-savvy people, >does not *automatically* qualify you as one of them. Just using a thing >for a l

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 8/27/18 2:57 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> in the "avantfax_hourly" file > Yes, of course it does, > > $ head -n 2 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php I've reread these two statements eleven times, and I *still* cannot see where

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David, > Eli wrote: > > Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which > > says "execute this script as a cron executable"? > > Yes, of course it does, > > $ head -n 2 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php `avantfax_hourly' != `phb.php'. > At this point the issue is moot.

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-27 Thread Guus Snijders via arch-general
Op ma 27 aug. 2018 08:57 schreef David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>: > On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > Why do you think run-parts "should" execute this file as a cron script? > > Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which say

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Why do you think run-parts "should" execute this file as a cron script? > Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which says > "execute this script as a cron executable"? Yes, of course it does, $ head -n 2 /sr

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Eli, > I would think that emulating the well-known behavior of "for actual > shell scripts which do not have shebangs, try using /bin/sh if no > interpreter is detected" would be a reasonable thing to do. It would be nice if that died out, just as the `first char is ':' v. '#'' test in the day

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 8/26/18 9:48 AM, SET wrote: > Le dimanche 26 août 2018 15:11:36 CEST Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit : >> some wonderful shebang > > Ha ! My wonderful shebang was "#/bin/sh" instead of "#!/bin/sh". > > After correcting the typo, run-parts does not complain. Yes, that helps if the script

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread SET
Le dimanche 26 août 2018 15:11:36 CEST Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit : > some wonderful shebang Ha ! My wonderful shebang was "#/bin/sh" instead of "#!/bin/sh". After correcting the typo, run-parts does not complain. Thanks.

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 8/26/18 5:49 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 08/26/2018 03:37 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Testing manually works fine: # ./phb.php >> It's not getting that far. > > I bet you would as root. The file is actually http:http owned, e.g. > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 http http 988 Sep 14 2016

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
On 08/26/2018 03:37 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: >>> Testing manually works fine: >>> >>> # ./phb.php > It's not getting that far. I bet you would as root. The file is actually http:http owned, e.g. -rwxr-xr-x 1 http http 988 Sep 14 2016 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php So running as root h

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David, > > Cron run-parts /etc/cron.hourly > > > > run-parts: failed to exec /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly: Exec format > > error > > run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly exited with return code 1 > > > > The cron job is: > > > > /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly > > > > # runs

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

2018-08-26 Thread SET
Le dimanche 26 août 2018 08:13:35 CEST David C. Rankin a écrit : > Cron run-parts /etc/cron.hourly > > run-parts: failed to exec /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly: Exec format > error run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly exited with return code 1 > I had a similar error on August 17 on

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/11/2018 05:32 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I don't know what the hiccup was, but for this box it was a death sentence. No > linker modules updated, only 2 out of 16 post install processes run. That > really leaves you in a bad way... > Well, it seems it was an issue and not just a hiccup. I

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-13 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On 3/13/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Like I said, this can be done from any system which has pacman and > mkinitcpio available. That means: > > 1) Arch Linux > 2) Gentoo, which has a pacman package and IIRC also provides mkinitcpio >as an option alongside dracut. > 3) Any Linux

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-13 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/13/2018 09:47 AM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote: >>> Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into >>> it. It's what I do

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-13 Thread Leonid Isaev via arch-general
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote: > > Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into > > it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create. > > > > https://ra

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-13 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote: > Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into > it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create. > > https://ramsdenj.com/2016/06/23/arch-linux-on-zfs-part-1-embed-zfs-in-archiso.html Yes, and it als

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-13 Thread Kyle Bassett via arch-general
Hi Carsten, I'm glad you ended up posting this to the list. Very useful info, even if I never end up using it. The rest of this thread has some great content too. Thanks all! On Mar 11, 2018 21:03, "Carsten Mattner via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 3/11/18, David C.

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread John Ramsden via arch-general
Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create. https://ramsdenj.com/2016/06/23/arch-linux-on-zfs-part-1-embed-zfs-in-archiso.html -- John Ramsden On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/12/2018 11:07 PM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote: > For anyone not happy with dkms, the archzfs repo [1] offers great > support for ZFS in binary form, and I've been using it for a few > years now with no problems. The most important part of using zfs is installing it. Especially consi

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread John Ramsden via arch-general
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, at 5:10 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > What's wrong with btrfs? Yeah, I know it is not marked "stable", but this > is just a label. And people shying away from it doesn't help in advancing > its stability either.

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Leonid Isaev via arch-general
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17:21PM +, Carsten Mattner wrote: > On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > > What's wrong with btrfs? Yeah, I know it is not marked "stable", but this > > is just a label. And people shying away from it doesn't help in advancing > > its stability either.

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
Sorry for letting gmail butcher wrapping/breaks. Someone at Google needs to be demoted for that anti-feature. I should remember to never edit in gmail's text box but use my normal editor as usual.

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
It almost looks like filesystem development doesn't fit Linux kernel development style of iterating constantly and evolving with time. btrfs has had the same time as zfs had in-house at Oracle before it was declared publicly stable, and there are still buggy/unfinished corners. If you look at past

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:24:37PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general > wrote: >> On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general >> wrote: >> > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: >> >> I'm happy to hear that. My ratio

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/12/2018 06:57 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: >> I'll stay away from it, thanks. I saw that Alpine Linux has good ZFS >> support, but I didn't do anything serious with it. When it comes to >> filesystems, I'm conservative, EXT4 and XFS on Linux. It's a pity >> there's no modern files

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Leonid Isaev via arch-general
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:24:37PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > >> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations > >> of needlessly heate

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: >> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations >> of needlessly heated arguments and ZFS, due to its license splitting >> the Linux community in half, appearing

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations > of needlessly heated arguments and ZFS, due to its license splitting > the Linux community in half, appearing to be perfect fuel for such > a thread. > > Thanks fo

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/11/2018 08:03 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > Hi David, > > so in the end you were able to boot off usb, right? > > Also, the nightmare you had to work through can be avoided on servers > where you run illumos or FreeBSD by way of ZFS boot environments (BE). > Basically, it's

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On 3/12/18, Celti Burroughs via arch-general wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 01:04:14 + > Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > >> Or I actually did post it to the list by accident. >> >> Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique >> available for FOSS servers. >>

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread Celti Burroughs via arch-general
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 01:04:14 + Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > Or I actually did post it to the list by accident. > > Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique > available for FOSS servers. > > On 3/12/18, Carsten Mattner wrote: > > On 3/11/18, David

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
Or I actually did post it to the list by accident. Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique available for FOSS servers. On 3/12/18, Carsten Mattner wrote: > On 3/11/18, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> This was a nightmare. It's not a CD problem, it's a problem with the

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On 3/11/18, David C. Rankin wrote: > This was a nightmare. It's not a CD problem, it's a problem with the system > seeing the CD Label and/or creating the /dev/disk/by-label directory in > time for the link to be created. Hi David, so in the end you were able to boot off usb, right? Also, the

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/11/2018 04:08 PM, Guus Snijders via arch-general wrote: > Op zo 11 mrt. 2018 21:29 schreef David C. Rankin < > drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>: > >> All, >> >> I experienced a hard lockup during kernel update to 4.15.8 on a >> Supermicro >> Dual Opteron Quad-core box. >> > [cd problem] >

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

2018-03-11 Thread Guus Snijders via arch-general
Op zo 11 mrt. 2018 21:29 schreef David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>: > All, > > I experienced a hard lockup during kernel update to 4.15.8 on a > Supermicro > Dual Opteron Quad-core box. > [cd problem] Just to make sure; can you run a memtest on this machine? It's a bit of a long

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.12.3-1 failed to rebuild DKMS virtualbox modules?

2017-07-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On 07/29/2017 01:58 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Update tonight to 4.12.3-1, and for the first time in years, DKMS failed to > rebuild the VirtualBox kernel modules. Specifically attempting a manual > install/build resulted in: > > # dkms install -m vboxhost -v 5.1.22 Solved, Updated to vbox

Re: [arch-general] update issue: veracrypt: removing wxgtk breaks dependency 'wxgtk>=3.0'

2017-06-08 Thread Óscar García Amor
2017-06-08 8:58 GMT+02:00 David C. Rankin : > All, > > [..] > I have checked the archlinux.org page and there are no notes. Is there a > recommended way to handle this? File a bug in veracrypt package to notify to maintainer. Greetings. -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://oga

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

2017-03-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/12/2017 10:36 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote: > On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote: >> All, >> >> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This >> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting >> to >> sync zones:

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

2017-03-12 Thread Mauro Santos via arch-general
On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This > server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to > sync zones: It seems other people also have noticed problems: https://bbs.archli

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

2017-03-12 Thread Doug Newgard
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:36:48 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > Should I open a bug, and if so, which package do I open it under? There already is one, has been for a couple of days

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

2017-03-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/12/2017 09:24 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > There is a BIG bug in one of those upgrades -- but which one? > If it helps, I had individually downgraded the following and tested, but named remained broken until I backed out the block of packages containing the kernel and gcc. I had individ

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

2017-03-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 03/12/2017 09:00 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > For some reason the 'libseccomp sandboxing active' command never issues and > /etc/named.conf is never processed. I have not touched the configuration here > in a "long long time..." > > Is this a kernel bug, a libseccomp bug, what? Uugh...

Re: [arch-general] Update delayed for more of two months, Lyx v2.1.4

2016-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 06/07/16 at 08:54pm, Xavier Corredor Llano via arch-general wrote: > Hi guys, > > Again the maintainer of Lyx [1] is so delay for update this package, here > [2] is the pkgbuild > updated and tested, can any TUs update this? Only developers have access to the extra repo. > > Thanks > > [

Re: [arch-general] Update delayed for more of two months, Lyx v2.1.4

2016-06-07 Thread Xavier Corredor Llano via arch-general
Hi guys, Again the maintainer of Lyx [1] is so delay for update this package, here [2] is the pkgbuild updated and tested, can any TUs update this? Thanks [1]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lyx/ [2]: PKGBUILD[1] -- Xavier Corredor Llano On Saturday, 24 October 2015 11:19

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2016-02-03 Thread G. Schlisio
> I am the one maintaining wget-git on AUR, so I do use the latest version > anyways. However, as the maintainer of GNU Wget, I am interested in what > keeps Arch Linux from adopting the newest version yet. It's been flagged > out of date for almost three months now. If there is something that prev

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2016-02-03 Thread Darshit Shah
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, G. Schlisio wrote: > Am 15.12.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Darshit Shah: > > Any updates on this issue? > > you might consider building it locally from ABS [0]. > it looks like a simple version bump is sufficient, and no other program > is linked against it, so you shou

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-27 Thread Jameson
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 3:37 PM Wolfgang Mader wrote: > > > On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: > > How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try > > connect user/password login... > > For you module error, check this page > https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-arch-li

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Ista Zahn
Yes, I have owncloud server and client running fine under php 7. You just need to follow the php upgrade instructions. On Jan 26, 2016 7:46 PM, "Yaroslav Mukhin" wrote: > I ended up downgrading back to php 5.6 to make owncloud client work again. > I too use nginx. I think the problem is with ownc

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Yaroslav Mukhin
I ended up downgrading back to php 5.6 to make owncloud client work again. I too use nginx. I think the problem is with owncloud clients, not the server setup. If anyone here has successfully upgraded to PHP 7 without breaking owncloud clients, please let us know. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:49 PM,

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Maykel Franco
El 26 ene. 2016 9:37 p. m., "Wolfgang Mader" escribió: > > > > On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: >> >> How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try >> connect user/password login... > > > For you module error, check this page > https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Mader
On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try connect user/password login... For you module error, check this page https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-arch-linux/ especially the paragraph "Configuration changes". As they are n

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread respiranto
On 2016-01-26 21:30, Wolfgang Mader wrote: > On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: >> [000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version >> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library >> '/usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so: >> cannot open shared ob

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Maykel Franco
How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try connect user/password login... 2016-01-26 21:30 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Mader : > On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: >> >> [000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version >> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dyna

Re: [arch-general] Update php 5.6 to 7.0.1 problems

2016-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Mader
On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: [000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2015-12-15 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 15.12.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Darshit Shah: > Any updates on this issue? you might consider building it locally from ABS [0]. it looks like a simple version bump is sufficient, and no other program is linked against it, so you should be fine. to receive the official package once it appears, you c

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2015-12-14 Thread Magnus Therning
Darshit Shah writes: > Hi, > > I noticed that it's been almost one month since the release of GNU Wget > 1.17 and yet it is not even in the [testing] repos. Is there anything > holding up? > > > A new bugfix version has just been released and I'd like to see that in the > repos as soon as possibl

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2015-12-14 Thread Doug Newgard
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:44:06 +0100 Darshit Shah wrote: > Any updates on this issue? First, don't top post. It's only been a month and the maintainer has limited internet availability right now. Unless there's something critical, it'll probably just wait. Doug > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:49

Re: [arch-general] Update GNU Wget

2015-12-14 Thread Darshit Shah
Any updates on this issue? On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Darshit Shah wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that it's been almost one month since the release of GNU Wget > 1.17 and yet it is not even in the [testing] repos. Is there anything > holding up? > > > A new bugfix version has just been release

Re: [arch-general] Update delayed for more of two months, Lyx v2.1.4

2015-10-24 Thread Antonio Rojas
Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > Hi guys, > > After more than two months ago Lyx [1] released the version 2.1.4 [2], > this is a minor and maintenance release (strongly recommended), in august, > and after flagged as out-date and wait some days, I contacted with the > maintainer (Ronald) and he did

Re: [arch-general] Update problems

2015-09-02 Thread edson duarte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nicholas MIller wrote: > Try changing the mirror your using > that worked! thanks! - -- edson duarte https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV5v70AAoJEEuaWOJw2A3LsucP/1fCmQZzN3kAsmWY2TYYcEn

Re: [arch-general] Update problems

2015-09-02 Thread Nicholas MIller
On Sep 2, 2015 9:29 AM, "edson duarte" wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > hi! > > pacman reports that the repositories are up to date for a couple of > weeks now with no errors or warnings and this had never happened, i've > tried looking in the forums and the news on

Re: [arch-general] Update to OpenCV 2.4.11?

2015-07-29 Thread André Apitzsch
Am Mittwoch, den 29.07.2015, 12:44 +0600 schrieb Rashif Ray Rahman: > On 29 July 2015 at 03:45, André Apitzsch > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still > > ships > > 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to >

Re: [arch-general] Update to OpenCV 2.4.11?

2015-07-28 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 29 July 2015 at 03:45, André Apitzsch wrote: > Hi everybody, > > OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still ships > 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to > 3.0. See http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/wiki/ChangeLog#30-rc > > What's holdin

Re: [arch-general] Update to OpenCV 2.4.11?

2015-07-28 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 PM, André Apitzsch < andre.apitz...@etit.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still ships > 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to > 3.0. See http://code.opencv.org/projects/

Re: [arch-general] Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon

2015-06-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:55:01 +0200, Jens Adam wrote: >https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45282 When I searched earlier yesterday, the ticket wasn't opened. Temporarily I added it to /etc/pacman.conf's IgnorePkg.

Re: [arch-general] Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon

2015-06-09 Thread Jens Adam
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45282

Re: [arch-general] Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon

2015-06-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:08:10 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: >I updated and replaced the packages, but I am not suddenly getting a >message to revive mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio. > >Do you have any packages installed that depend on it? If so, why could I replace it with mate-settings-daemon, when ru

Re: [arch-general] Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon

2015-06-09 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > earlier today an update asked me to replace > mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio with mate-settings-daemon. After taking > a look at the old and new package I replaced it. > > From an hour ago until now the update asks to replace > mate-

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-23 Thread Francis Gerund
Thanks, guys. I appreciate the support! : ) On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Aaron Caffrey wrote: > On 21/04/15 at 09:10am, Francis Gerund wrote: > >> >> But reading is not always the most efficient or even the most effective >> learning modality. Often, just asking questions is the best wa

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-22 Thread Aaron Caffrey
On 21/04/15 at 09:10am, Francis Gerund wrote: But reading is not always the most efficient or even the most effective learning modality. Often, just asking questions is the best way to promote knowledge transfer. Hello Francis, I have never inteded to discourage you or hurt your feelings. I

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-22 Thread john
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:10:00AM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote: > Okay . . . > > Thank you for the input. > > May I just state that I can (and do) use all of the information resources > aforementioned. Oh, if you only knew the may hours I have spent reading, > reading, reading. Yes, I have lear

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-21 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Francis Gerund wrote: > Eli, I did not mean to imply that the way you showed is wrong. > > I am totally new to Arch and pacman, so I really don't know how this all > works. > > > I am just trying to learn. > Don't worry about it. I was just clarifying that the u

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-21 Thread Francis Gerund
Okay . . . Thank you for the input. May I just state that I can (and do) use all of the information resources aforementioned. Oh, if you only knew the may hours I have spent reading, reading, reading. Yes, I have learned much from reading. But reading is not always the most efficient or even t

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-20 Thread Aaron Caffrey
Hello Francis, In archlinux you have to rely on the wiki, man pages and info documents more often than you do in the mail list, as a lot the wiki pages there are written by people that have dedicated a lot of their free time to write the provided information correctly and well explained, also the

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-20 Thread Aaron Caffrey
On 17/04/15 at 08:45pm, Francis Gerund wrote: The error mysteriously went away. Hello Francis, It is awesome to hear that your issue is solved. As Sebastian Vettel noted, your mirrors was 'out-of-sync' that is why I suggested you a simple solution derived from the wiki. Best regards, Aaron

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-20 Thread Francis Gerund
Eli, I did not mean to imply that the way you showed is wrong. I am totally new to Arch and pacman, so I really don't know how this all works. I am just trying to learn. On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Francis Gerund wrote: > > > Just

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-19 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Francis Gerund wrote: > Just using reflector only, as per the wiki mirror page, wouldn't this be > simpler: > > sudo reflector --verbose --country 'United States' -l 200 -p http --sort > rate --save /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist > > It *seems* to work okay from here, a

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-19 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mark Lee wrote: > This is a known issue regarding the way Arch syncs mirrors. There's even a > bug > report for a particular mirror > < > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/44374?project=1&cat%5B0%5D=31&string=pacman-mirrorlist > > That bug report would lead to peo

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-19 Thread Francis Gerund
Just using reflector only, as per the wiki mirror page, wouldn't this be simpler: sudo reflector --verbose --country 'United States' -l 200 -p http --sort rate --save /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist It *seems* to work okay from here, and does not explicitly require use of rankmirrors or a mirrorgen file

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-19 Thread Mark Lee
On Sunday, April 19, 2015 01:58:52 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Francis Gerund wrote: > > I did re-generate the mirrorlist using rankmirrors, as shown on the arch > > wiki "mirrors" page: > > > > Back up the existing /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist: > > > > # cp /etc/pacman

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-19 Thread Eli Schwartz
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Francis Gerund wrote: > I did re-generate the mirrorlist using rankmirrors, as shown on the arch > wiki "mirrors" page: > > Back up the existing /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist: > > # cp /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup > > Edit /etc/pacman.d/mirr

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-17 Thread Francis Gerund
I did re-generate the mirrorlist using rankmirrors, as shown on the arch wiki "mirrors" page: Back up the existing /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist: # cp /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup Edit /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup and uncomment mirrors for testing with rankmirrors. Opt

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-17 Thread Aaron Caffrey
On 16/04/15 at 05:26pm, Francis Gerund wrote: Just recently did: sudo pacmatic -Syuv and got: :: Synchronizing package databases... error: failed retrieving file 'core.db' from arch.localmsp.org : Connection timed out after 1 milliseconds core is up to date error: failed retrieving file 'e

Re: [arch-general] update error(?)

2015-04-16 Thread Sébastien Leblanc
The mirror you picked is out-of-sync with the main mirrors. Either pick a different mirror or wait until it is in sync.

Re: [arch-general] update to calibre-0.9.15-1

2013-01-18 Thread phani
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 03:16:58 +0530, phani wrote: Alternatively, you could have informed yourself about what *.pyc/*.pyo files are and answered your own question. "RTFM" makes sense to me. "study python packaging before asking the list" does not. that probably came across a bit harsh or un

Re: [arch-general] update to calibre-0.9.15-1

2013-01-18 Thread phani
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:14:54 +0530, Alexander Bashmakov wrote: It is common issue when you run as root python program without precompiled pyc/pyo, now pyc/pyo provided by package and conflict with autogenerated. the only thing i ran as root was pacman; certainly not calibre. -- phani.

Re: [arch-general] update to calibre-0.9.15-1

2013-01-18 Thread phani
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:48:37 +0530, Martti Kühne wrote: No one that hasn't touched the calibre software will suffer from the existing files. i haven't touched the calibre software -- if that means done any manual changes to it's files. if you mean "used the calibre software," that i did.

Re: [arch-general] update to calibre-0.9.15-1

2013-01-18 Thread Martti Kühne
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Karol Babioch wrote: > Hi, > > Am 18.01.2013 13:59, schrieb phani: >> during today's update from calibre 0.9.14-1 -> 0.9.15-1, pacman complained >> that all packages under /usr/lib/calibre/calibre were already existing in >> the filesystem, and therefore the update

  1   2   >