Hi,
I also asked me that question some time ago...
boost 1.72 was flagged out of date on 2020-04-28, but is still in the repos.
Since then
1.73 was released on 2020-04-28
1.74 was released on 2020-08-14
Greetings
Mathias
Am 07.10.20 um 23:58 schrieb karx via arch-general:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020
Hi,
The package has been market out of date for quite some time now
(almost 4 months) [0].
One release has now actually been skipped (1.73).
--
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
[0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/boost/
On October 7, 2020 11:58:52 PM GMT+02:00, karx via arch-general
wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general <
>arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>How long has the updated version been available? If it was just
>released
>then it will take some time for it to get packag
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Is there a reason why boost libraries are stuck to version 1.72 when
> 1.74 are already available? I cannot find anything on the bug tracker.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Best
> Jayesh Badwaik
>
Hi,
Is there a reason why boost libraries are stuck to version 1.72 when
1.74 are already available? I cannot find anything on the bug tracker.
Thank you.
--
Best
Jayesh Badwaik
https://www.archlinux.org/todo/use-https-in-the-url-field/
https://gist.github.com/b1tninja/9a1184a9713a16e77c7ae65d1829d589
git clone --depth=1 --no-checkout
"https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git"; pkgs;
pushd pkgs;
git reset --hard HEAD;
git checkout HEAD -- */trunk/PKGBUILD;
doms=($(
Apologies Eli, I really didn't mean to make a nuisance of myself on the
list. I only punted the patch here because there was no maintainer
listed in the PKGBUILD. Since I saw similar patches doing the rounds on
the other OS mailing lists I'm subscribed to, I thought I'd submit mine
here. On sec
On 12/30/18 8:49 PM, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote:
> Ping?
Pong.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pong
> On 2018-12-25 02:11:24, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote:
>> This patch updates groff to version 1.22.4, which was released
>> yesterday. I had to change th
Ping?
On 2018-12-25 02:11:24, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote:
> This patch updates groff to version 1.22.4, which was released
> yesterday. I had to change the PGP key from Werner to Bertrand, and I
> also removed some lingering whitespace.
>
> OK?
> --
> Stephen Gregoratto
> PGP Fi
This patch updates groff to version 1.22.4, which was released
yesterday. I had to change the PGP key from Werner to Bertrand, and I
also removed some lingering whitespace.
OK?
--
Stephen Gregoratto
PGP Fingerprint: 3FC6 3D0E 2801 C348 1C44 2D34 A80C 0F8E 8BAB EC8B
Need my key? Get it with:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 27, 2018 1:38 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as wise
> > and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt t
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:59:07 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
>At least Eli took time to explain what actually went wrong.
He also took the time to send a _signed_ mail off-list to me. I am
afraid he's rather unwell. Calling me names :D and he's completely lost
in a biased fantasy world
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:38:12 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as
> >> wise and psychologic
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:38:12 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as
>> wise and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt that anybody
>> of us is able to lea
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as wise
> and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt that anybody of us is
> able to learn from your wise comments, more likely we laugh at you,
> because we are psy
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:58:33 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> I have run Arch on it since 2009 -- I'm familiar with what it does.
>
>Just using a thing often used by intelligent, computer-savvy people,
>does not *automatically* qualify you as one of them. Just using a thing
>for a l
On 8/27/18 2:57 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> in the "avantfax_hourly" file
> Yes, of course it does,
>
> $ head -n 2 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php
I've reread these two statements eleven times, and I *still* cannot see
where
Hi David,
> Eli wrote:
> > Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which
> > says "execute this script as a cron executable"?
>
> Yes, of course it does,
>
> $ head -n 2 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php
`avantfax_hourly' != `phb.php'.
> At this point the issue is moot.
Op ma 27 aug. 2018 08:57 schreef David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>:
> On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> > Why do you think run-parts "should" execute this file as a cron script?
> > Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which say
On 08/26/2018 08:11 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> Why do you think run-parts "should" execute this file as a cron script?
> Is there some wonderful shebang in the "avantfax_hourly" file which says
> "execute this script as a cron executable"?
Yes, of course it does,
$ head -n 2 /sr
Hi Eli,
> I would think that emulating the well-known behavior of "for actual
> shell scripts which do not have shebangs, try using /bin/sh if no
> interpreter is detected" would be a reasonable thing to do.
It would be nice if that died out, just as the `first char is ':'
v. '#'' test in the day
On 8/26/18 9:48 AM, SET wrote:
> Le dimanche 26 août 2018 15:11:36 CEST Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit :
>> some wonderful shebang
>
> Ha ! My wonderful shebang was "#/bin/sh" instead of "#!/bin/sh".
>
> After correcting the typo, run-parts does not complain.
Yes, that helps if the script
Le dimanche 26 août 2018 15:11:36 CEST Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit :
> some wonderful shebang
Ha ! My wonderful shebang was "#/bin/sh" instead of "#!/bin/sh".
After correcting the typo, run-parts does not complain.
Thanks.
On 8/26/18 5:49 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 08/26/2018 03:37 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Testing manually works fine:
# ./phb.php
>> It's not getting that far.
>
> I bet you would as root. The file is actually http:http owned, e.g.
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 http http 988 Sep 14 2016
On 08/26/2018 03:37 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>>> Testing manually works fine:
>>>
>>> # ./phb.php
> It's not getting that far.
I bet you would as root. The file is actually http:http owned, e.g.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 http http 988 Sep 14 2016 /srv/http/avantfax/includes/phb.php
So running as root h
Hi David,
> > Cron run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
> >
> > run-parts: failed to exec /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly: Exec format
> > error
> > run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly exited with return code 1
> >
> > The cron job is:
> >
> > /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly
> >
> > # runs
Le dimanche 26 août 2018 08:13:35 CEST David C. Rankin a écrit :
> Cron run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
>
> run-parts: failed to exec /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly: Exec format
> error run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly exited with return code 1
>
I had a similar error on August 17 on
All,
After the linux-firmware update I have started receiving strange cron
messages:
Cron run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
run-parts: failed to exec /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly: Exec format error
run-parts: /etc/cron.hourly/avantfax_hourly exited with return code 1
The cron job is:
/etc
All,
The samba, smbclient, libwbclient from 4.7.6 to 4.8 breaks role=standalone
breaks the standalone file-server and cifs mounts.
Gone with 4.8 are the nmbd.service and smbd.service. Standalone servers
should use windbind.service for file sharing and cifs mounts -- but it does
not work.
A
On 03/11/2018 05:32 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I don't know what the hiccup was, but for this box it was a death sentence. No
> linker modules updated, only 2 out of 16 post install processes run. That
> really leaves you in a bad way...
>
Well, it seems it was an issue and not just a hiccup. I
On 3/13/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> Like I said, this can be done from any system which has pacman and
> mkinitcpio available. That means:
>
> 1) Arch Linux
> 2) Gentoo, which has a pacman package and IIRC also provides mkinitcpio
>as an option alongside dracut.
> 3) Any Linux
On 03/13/2018 09:47 AM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote:
>>> Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into
>>> it. It's what I do
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote:
> > Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into
> > it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create.
> >
> > https://ra
On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote:
> Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into
> it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create.
>
> https://ramsdenj.com/2016/06/23/arch-linux-on-zfs-part-1-embed-zfs-in-archiso.html
Yes, and it als
Hi Carsten, I'm glad you ended up posting this to the list. Very useful
info, even if I never end up using it.
The rest of this thread has some great content too.
Thanks all!
On Mar 11, 2018 21:03, "Carsten Mattner via arch-general" <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 3/11/18, David C.
Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into it. It's
what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create.
https://ramsdenj.com/2016/06/23/arch-linux-on-zfs-part-1-embed-zfs-in-archiso.html
--
John Ramsden
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/12/2018 11:07 PM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote:
> For anyone not happy with dkms, the archzfs repo [1] offers great
> support for ZFS in binary form, and I've been using it for a few
> years now with no problems.
The most important part of using zfs is installing it. Especially
consi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, at 5:10 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> What's wrong with btrfs? Yeah, I know it is not marked "stable", but this
> is just a label. And people shying away from it doesn't help in advancing
> its stability either.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17:21PM +, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> > What's wrong with btrfs? Yeah, I know it is not marked "stable", but this
> > is just a label. And people shying away from it doesn't help in advancing
> > its stability either.
Sorry for letting gmail butcher wrapping/breaks. Someone at Google
needs to be demoted for that anti-feature. I should remember to never
edit in gmail's text box but use my normal editor as usual.
It almost looks like filesystem development doesn't fit Linux kernel
development style
of iterating constantly and evolving with time. btrfs has had the same
time as zfs
had in-house at Oracle before it was declared publicly stable, and
there are still
buggy/unfinished corners.
If you look at past
On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:24:37PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general
> wrote:
>> On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
>> wrote:
>> > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>> >> I'm happy to hear that. My ratio
On 03/12/2018 06:57 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
>> I'll stay away from it, thanks. I saw that Alpine Linux has good ZFS
>> support, but I didn't do anything serious with it. When it comes to
>> filesystems, I'm conservative, EXT4 and XFS on Linux. It's a pity
>> there's no modern files
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:24:37PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general
wrote:
> On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> >> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations
> >> of needlessly heate
On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations
>> of needlessly heated arguments and ZFS, due to its license splitting
>> the Linux community in half, appearing
On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past observations
> of needlessly heated arguments and ZFS, due to its license splitting
> the Linux community in half, appearing to be perfect fuel for such
> a thread.
>
> Thanks fo
On 03/11/2018 08:03 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> so in the end you were able to boot off usb, right?
>
> Also, the nightmare you had to work through can be avoided on servers
> where you run illumos or FreeBSD by way of ZFS boot environments (BE).
> Basically, it's
On 3/12/18, Celti Burroughs via arch-general wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 01:04:14 +
> Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>
>> Or I actually did post it to the list by accident.
>>
>> Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique
>> available for FOSS servers.
>>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 01:04:14 +
Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> Or I actually did post it to the list by accident.
>
> Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique
> available for FOSS servers.
>
> On 3/12/18, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> > On 3/11/18, David
Or I actually did post it to the list by accident.
Please don't flame me for mention ZFS boot environments as a technique
available for FOSS servers.
On 3/12/18, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On 3/11/18, David C. Rankin wrote:
>
>> This was a nightmare. It's not a CD problem, it's a problem with the
On 3/11/18, David C. Rankin wrote:
> This was a nightmare. It's not a CD problem, it's a problem with the system
> seeing the CD Label and/or creating the /dev/disk/by-label directory in
> time for the link to be created.
Hi David,
so in the end you were able to boot off usb, right?
Also, the
On 03/11/2018 04:08 PM, Guus Snijders via arch-general wrote:
> Op zo 11 mrt. 2018 21:29 schreef David C. Rankin <
> drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I experienced a hard lockup during kernel update to 4.15.8 on a
>> Supermicro
>> Dual Opteron Quad-core box.
>>
> [cd problem]
>
Op zo 11 mrt. 2018 21:29 schreef David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>:
> All,
>
> I experienced a hard lockup during kernel update to 4.15.8 on a
> Supermicro
> Dual Opteron Quad-core box.
>
[cd problem]
Just to make sure; can you run a memtest on this machine? It's a bit of a
long
All,
I experienced a hard lockup during kernel update to 4.15.8 on a Supermicro
Dual Opteron Quad-core box. I've updated this box 50 times without issue, but
something caused a hardlock. The filesystems are on mdadm linux-raid 1
partitions.
The hardlock occurred after the packages were insta
On 07/29/2017 01:58 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Update tonight to 4.12.3-1, and for the first time in years, DKMS failed to
> rebuild the VirtualBox kernel modules. Specifically attempting a manual
> install/build resulted in:
>
> # dkms install -m vboxhost -v 5.1.22
Solved,
Updated to vbox
Archdevs,
Update tonight to 4.12.3-1, and for the first time in years, DKMS failed to
rebuild the VirtualBox kernel modules. Specifically attempting a manual
install/build resulted in:
# dkms install -m vboxhost -v 5.1.22
Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping...
Building m
2017-06-08 8:58 GMT+02:00 David C. Rankin :
> All,
>
> [..]
> I have checked the archlinux.org page and there are no notes. Is there a
> recommended way to handle this?
File a bug in veracrypt package to notify to maintainer.
Greetings.
--
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://oga
All,
There was a slight hitch in the system update tonight with the requirement of:
Replace wxgtk with extra/wxgtk2?
choosing 'Y' results in unmet dependencies for veracrypt, e.g.
:: Replace wxgtk with extra/wxgtk2? [Y/n]
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: fa
On 03/12/2017 10:36 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
> On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
>> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting
>> to
>> sync zones:
On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to
> sync zones:
It seems other people also have noticed problems:
https://bbs.archli
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:36:48 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Should I open a bug, and if so, which package do I open it under?
There already is one, has been for a couple of days
On 03/12/2017 09:24 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> There is a BIG bug in one of those upgrades -- but which one?
>
If it helps, I had individually downgraded the following and tested, but
named remained broken until I backed out the block of packages containing the
kernel and gcc. I had individ
On 03/12/2017 09:00 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> For some reason the 'libseccomp sandboxing active' command never issues and
> /etc/named.conf is never processed. I have not touched the configuration here
> in a "long long time..."
>
> Is this a kernel bug, a libseccomp bug, what?
Uugh...
All,
After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to
sync zones:
# rndc -V sync --clean
create memory context
create socket manager
create task manager
create task
create logging context
s
On 06/07/16 at 08:54pm, Xavier Corredor Llano via arch-general wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Again the maintainer of Lyx [1] is so delay for update this package, here
> [2] is the pkgbuild
> updated and tested, can any TUs update this?
Only developers have access to the extra repo.
>
> Thanks
>
> [
Hi guys,
Again the maintainer of Lyx [1] is so delay for update this package, here [2]
is the pkgbuild
updated and tested, can any TUs update this?
Thanks
[1]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lyx/
[2]: PKGBUILD[1]
--
Xavier Corredor Llano
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 11:19
hi
how do i create a ca certificate bundle with update-ca-trust extract or
trust extract-compat
which includes my root and intermediate certificates plus
Equifax_Secure_CA.pem and thawte_Primary_Root_CA.pem,
i need this for postfix to relay through gmail,
on a previous instalation of postfix i sim
> I am the one maintaining wget-git on AUR, so I do use the latest version
> anyways. However, as the maintainer of GNU Wget, I am interested in what
> keeps Arch Linux from adopting the newest version yet. It's been flagged
> out of date for almost three months now. If there is something that prev
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, G. Schlisio wrote:
> Am 15.12.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> > Any updates on this issue?
>
> you might consider building it locally from ABS [0].
> it looks like a simple version bump is sufficient, and no other program
> is linked against it, so you shou
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 3:37 PM Wolfgang Mader
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
> > How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try
> > connect user/password login...
>
> For you module error, check this page
> https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-arch-li
Yes, I have owncloud server and client running fine under php 7. You just
need to follow the php upgrade instructions.
On Jan 26, 2016 7:46 PM, "Yaroslav Mukhin"
wrote:
> I ended up downgrading back to php 5.6 to make owncloud client work again.
> I too use nginx. I think the problem is with ownc
I ended up downgrading back to php 5.6 to make owncloud client work again.
I too use nginx. I think the problem is with owncloud clients, not the
server setup. If anyone here has successfully upgraded to PHP 7 without
breaking owncloud clients, please let us know.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:49 PM,
El 26 ene. 2016 9:37 p. m., "Wolfgang Mader"
escribió:
>
>
>
> On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
>>
>> How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try
>> connect user/password login...
>
>
> For you module error, check this page
> https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-
On 01/26/2016 09:31 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try
connect user/password login...
For you module error, check this page
https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-7-on-arch-linux/
especially the paragraph "Configuration changes". As they are n
On 2016-01-26 21:30, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
>> [000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version
>> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
>> '/usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so:
>> cannot open shared ob
How to resolve this warning?? I have error with owncloud client try
connect user/password login...
2016-01-26 21:30 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Mader :
> On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
>>
>> [000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version
>> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dyna
On 01/26/2016 09:21 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
[000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown
on line
[000][+][[user@arch-xbmc: /etc/php]] $ php --version
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/mysql.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown
on line 0
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dy
Am 15.12.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> Any updates on this issue?
you might consider building it locally from ABS [0].
it looks like a simple version bump is sufficient, and no other program
is linked against it, so you should be fine.
to receive the official package once it appears, you c
Darshit Shah writes:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that it's been almost one month since the release of GNU Wget
> 1.17 and yet it is not even in the [testing] repos. Is there anything
> holding up?
>
>
> A new bugfix version has just been released and I'd like to see that in the
> repos as soon as possibl
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:44:06 +0100
Darshit Shah wrote:
> Any updates on this issue?
First, don't top post.
It's only been a month and the maintainer has limited internet availability
right now. Unless there's something critical, it'll probably just wait.
Doug
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:49
Any updates on this issue?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that it's been almost one month since the release of GNU Wget
> 1.17 and yet it is not even in the [testing] repos. Is there anything
> holding up?
>
>
> A new bugfix version has just been release
Hi,
I noticed that it's been almost one month since the release of GNU Wget
1.17 and yet it is not even in the [testing] repos. Is there anything
holding up?
A new bugfix version has just been released and I'd like to see that in the
repos as soon as possible. If there's any issues, please let u
Xavier Corredor Llano wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> After more than two months ago Lyx [1] released the version 2.1.4 [2],
> this is a minor and maintenance release (strongly recommended), in august,
> and after flagged as out-date and wait some days, I contacted with the
> maintainer (Ronald) and he did
Hi guys,
After more than two months ago Lyx [1] released the version 2.1.4 [2], this is
a minor and maintenance release (strongly recommended), in august, and after
flagged as out-date and wait some days, I contacted with the maintainer
(Ronald) and he didn't answer me (I understand, maybe he i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicholas MIller wrote:
> Try changing the mirror your using
>
that worked! thanks!
- --
edson duarte
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV5v70AAoJEEuaWOJw2A3LsucP/1fCmQZzN3kAsmWY2TYYcEn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi!
pacman reports that the repositories are up to date for a couple of
weeks now with no errors or warnings and this had never happened, i've
tried looking in the forums and the news on the website but found nothin
g.
anyone knows why this is happ
On Sep 2, 2015 9:29 AM, "edson duarte" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> hi!
>
> pacman reports that the repositories are up to date for a couple of
> weeks now with no errors or warnings and this had never happened, i've
> tried looking in the forums and the news on
Am Mittwoch, den 29.07.2015, 12:44 +0600 schrieb Rashif Ray Rahman:
> On 29 July 2015 at 03:45, André Apitzsch
> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still
> > ships
> > 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to
>
On 29 July 2015 at 03:45, André Apitzsch
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still ships
> 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to
> 3.0. See http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/wiki/ChangeLog#30-rc
>
> What's holdin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 PM, André Apitzsch <
andre.apitz...@etit.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still ships
> 2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to
> 3.0. See http://code.opencv.org/projects/
Hi everybody,
OpenCV 2.4.11 has been released about five months ago. Arch still ships
2.4.10. An Update to the newer version would simplify transition to
3.0. See http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/wiki/ChangeLog#30-rc
What's holding back an update to 2.4.11?
Regards,
André
signature.asc
De
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:55:01 +0200, Jens Adam wrote:
>https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45282
When I searched earlier yesterday, the ticket wasn't opened.
Temporarily I added it to /etc/pacman.conf's IgnorePkg.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45282
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:08:10 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>I updated and replaced the packages, but I am not suddenly getting a
>message to revive mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio.
>
>Do you have any packages installed that depend on it?
If so, why could I replace it with mate-settings-daemon, when ru
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> earlier today an update asked me to replace
> mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio with mate-settings-daemon. After taking
> a look at the old and new package I replaced it.
>
> From an hour ago until now the update asks to replace
> mate-
Hi,
earlier today an update asked me to replace
mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio with mate-settings-daemon. After taking
a look at the old and new package I replaced it.
From an hour ago until now the update asks to replace
mate-settings-daemon with mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio.
If I reply wit
Thanks, guys. I appreciate the support!
: )
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Aaron Caffrey
wrote:
> On 21/04/15 at 09:10am, Francis Gerund wrote:
>
>>
>> But reading is not always the most efficient or even the most effective
>> learning modality. Often, just asking questions is the best wa
On 21/04/15 at 09:10am, Francis Gerund wrote:
But reading is not always the most efficient or even the most effective
learning modality. Often, just asking questions is the best way to promote
knowledge transfer.
Hello Francis,
I have never inteded to discourage you or hurt your feelings. I
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:10:00AM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
> Okay . . .
>
> Thank you for the input.
>
> May I just state that I can (and do) use all of the information resources
> aforementioned. Oh, if you only knew the may hours I have spent reading,
> reading, reading. Yes, I have lear
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
