On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:57:02PM +0800, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>
>> by gmail, do you mean the gmail web interface or the gmail mail
>> service?
>
> The threading is done by the mail clie
On 04/11/2011 01:38 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
1. You cannot change the panels anymore you stuck with the 2 given by
gnome 3.
2. Changing themes also is inpossible.. or so it seems.
3. Why do we need a system settings menu with all the option
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> 1. You cannot change the panels anymore you stuck with the 2 given by
> gnome 3.
> 2. Changing themes also is inpossible.. or so it seems.
> 3. Why do we need a system settings menu with all the options in one
> menu ? where are my sepera
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:57:02PM +0800, Auguste Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> by gmail, do you mean the gmail web interface or the gmail mail
> service?
The threading is done by the mail client and has nothing to do with the
mail protocol SMTP/IMAP etc.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, SanskritFritz
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
>>>
2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, SanskritFritz
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying to an existing
>>> thread and changing the topic
>>>
>>
>> W
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, SanskritFritz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
>
>> 2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying to an existing
>> thread and changing the topic
>>
>
> What's wrong with that?
>
Changing the topic has no effect on th
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> 2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying to an existing
> thread and changing the topic
>
What's wrong with that?
Dennis,
If you like Gnome2 that much, fix your self up with a nix install with
Gnome2 and just don't update for the next few years. No, I'm not
kidding. No one is forcing you to upgrade.
Complaining about WMs amazes me as they're so may you can choose from.
There's so many distros to choose from f
According to Baho Utot:
# Hey wait I didn't get any sticker when I installed it.
#
# I want my money back!
I don't need my money back. It hasn't broken my system or mamed any
puppies yet, so a refund is not necessary. Just give me the sticker and
we'll call it even. :)
~Kyle
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 13:13:42 Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:40 +0300, Alper Kanat wrote:
> > s/failback/fallback/g
> >
> > sorry for the typo..
> >
> > ---
> > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:39, Alper Kanat wrote:
> > > Hello Fellow
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:42:57 Arthur Titeica wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:50:41 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> > [flaming]
> > I though KDE 4 was bad and bloated and that i couldn't get any
> > worse...
> > it seems i was wrong.
> > Boy this new Gnome version is even more bloated and buggy
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> While with GNOME it's the case that GNOME2 is dead , SO LONG LIVE
> GNOME3!!
>
> *jelly drinks beer with his gnome friends
Seriously, if someone does fork gnome2, they should so call it troll.
Pete.
First up, sorry for going off topic a bit.
On Sunday 10 April 2011 19:42:57 Arthur Titeica wrote:
> Add this to the fact that the kernel isn't exactly desktop optimized
> (stuff like let me move the mouse while I extract that damn 4G archive)
> and you'll probably get what feels like a slow s
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:40 +0300, Alper Kanat wrote:
> s/failback/fallback/g
>
> sorry for the typo..
>
> ---
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:39, Alper Kanat wrote:
>
> > Hello Fellow Archers,
> >
> > Most people say that Arch is cutting edge and saving GNO
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:50:41 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
[flaming]
I though KDE 4 was bad and bloated and that i couldn't get any
worse...
it seems i was wrong.
Boy this new Gnome version is even more bloated and buggy then KDE 4
wich is quite the atchievement from the gnome team...
Pleas
On Sunday 10 April 2011 10:09:25 am Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
[putolin]
> No, because that's not how Arch works. Gnome3 is not broken, nor will
> it break anyone's computer. Arch is bleeding-edge, it said so on the
> sticker when you installed it =)
Hey wait I didn't get any sticker when I installed it
2011-04-10 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman:
> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even
> be considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same
> direction when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
I read about various comparisons between Linux vs. Wi
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 15:07:27 Dennis Beekman wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> >> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> >> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in
It is against the Arch way when it's not even going to be actively maintained
upstream for much longer. GNOME 2's got maybe 6-8 months at most before
it's support is gone upstream, and Arch isn't there to act as a "historical
archive" of old desktop environments. Especially in the likely event G
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 14:50:41 Dennis Beekman wrote:
> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
> when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
>
This is all a matter of opinion. I
s/failback/fallback/g
sorry for the typo..
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:39, Alper Kanat wrote:
> Hello Fellow Archers,
>
> Most people say that Arch is cutting edge and saving GNOME2 as gnome2 is
> not the the Arch way. I know that packaging and maintaining GN
Hello Fellow Archers,
Most people say that Arch is cutting edge and saving GNOME2 as gnome2 is not
the the Arch way. I know that packaging and maintaining GNOME2 is a hard
task that no devs would want to take care of and that we'll most likely be
seeing unofficial repositories but what about pytho
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 07:04 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>>
>>> Or you could just save yourself the hassle and just switch over to
>>> XFCE, awesomewm, the possibilities are endless. More productive t
On 04/10/2011 07:04 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Or you could just save yourself the hassle and just switch over to
XFCE, awesomewm, the possibilities are endless. More productive than
pining over a DE that's now officially dead (dying).
xfce depen
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Or you could just save yourself the hassle and just switch over to
> XFCE, awesomewm, the possibilities are endless. More productive than
> pining over a DE that's now officially dead (dying).
>
xfce depends on gtk2. when gnome3 hits the repo, i
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:50:41 -0300, Dennis Beekman
wrote:
Linux is about freedom. You have tons of WM and DE to choose from, I
suggest to give a try to Xfce and LXDE. Both work almost the same as Gnome
2 without the bloat.
Anyway, whining in Arch's discussion mail because of a DE decisio
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Dennis Beekman <
d.c.beekman.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
>>
>>> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
>>> considered ... b
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 22:07 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> >> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> >> considered ... but lately Linux has been going i
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Dennis Beekman
wrote:
> We are being forced to use de's like openbox or xfce wich is the primary
> reason people shy away from unix/linux when changing from Windows to another
> OS.
> It just becomes to confusing and complicated from they point of view and
> they c
On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3&
On 04/10/2011 10:50 PM, Dennis Beekman wrote:
Can we not just keeps using the old version and ignore the new version
of gnome for now until they get they act together ? or hopefully decide
to go back to the old interface and develop that further instead ...
i give it you the option to create a
On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Dennis Beekman wrote:
I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
Gnome 2 was brilliant just a simple easy to use sy
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Dennis Beekman
wrote:
> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction when it
> comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
>
> Gnome 2 was brilliant just a simple
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
> when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
>
> Gnome 2 was brilliant just a s
I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
Gnome 2 was brilliant just a simple easy to use system with load off
good looking features, gnom
36 matches
Mail list logo
