Re: [arch-general] Display issues with Linux 3.1

2011-11-13 Thread hollunder
> hollunder@... wrote: > >>> hollunder@..., Sat 2011-11-12 @ 22:42:57-0500: >>> [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22674#c11 >> >> Thanks Taylor, >> I still consider this a bug because this didn't happen for years but >> seems

Re: [arch-general] Display issues with Linux 3.1

2011-11-13 Thread hollunder
> hollun...@lavabit.com, Sun 2011-11-13 @ 11:18:05-0500: >> Another workaround is to disable kms by booting with the nomodeset >> option. >> >> Another new issue is that my mousepointer frequently >> flickers/disappears and that xv video out in smplayer doesn't work >> anymore, but both of those ar

Re: [arch-general] Display issues with Linux 3.1

2011-11-13 Thread hollunder
> hollun...@lavabit.com, Sat 2011-11-12 @ 22:42:57-0500: >> I'm rather sure this is a new intel driver bug, I have the exact same >> issue. My laptops chipset is slightly newer: >> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 >> Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) (r

Re: [arch-general] Display issues with Linux 3.1

2011-11-12 Thread hollunder
> Since updating to Linux 3.1 yesterday, I've been having strange problems > with the display on my laptop. The first reboot after updating the > kernel went normally, but every subsequent boot since then has had > problems. > > This is a Dell Latitude D620 laptop with the following graphics-relate

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [LAU] A sound decision]

2010-02-10 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Uli Armbruster's message of 2010-02-10 13:11:50 +0100: > * hollunder [10.02.2010 12:45]: > > Well, there are also lots of people who have complaints about macs and > > pt, but pt sure has good marketing. I doubt a networked setup such as > > his would be p

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [LAU] A sound decision]

2010-02-10 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Uli Armbruster's message of 2010-02-10 09:28:12 +0100: > * Ng Oon-Ee [09.02.2010 23:46]: > > Forwarding the below, for those interested. fons, you'd maybe like this? > > > > Forwarded Message > > > To: linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org > > > Subject: [LAU] A so

Re: [arch-general] A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

2010-02-08 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Brendan Long's message of 2010-02-09 02:09:13 +0100: > On 02/08/2010 05:50 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 09/02/10 10:05, hollunder wrote: > >> Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-02-09 00:26:37 +0100: > >>> On 09/02/10 04:49, Xav

Re: [arch-general] A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

2010-02-08 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-02-09 01:50:02 +0100: > On 09/02/10 10:05, hollunder wrote: > > Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-02-09 00:26:37 +0100: > >> On 09/02/10 04:49, Xavier Chantry wrote: > >>> With every big rebuilds we

Re: [arch-general] A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

2010-02-08 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Brendan Long's message of 2010-02-09 01:06:07 +0100: > On 02/08/2010 04:48 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 13:37 -0700, Brendan Long wrote: > > > >> Couldn't the piecemeal update problem be fixed by just putting > >> version > >> numbers in the depends() section

Re: [arch-general] A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

2010-02-08 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-02-09 00:26:37 +0100: > On 09/02/10 04:49, Xavier Chantry wrote: > > With every big rebuilds we get new breakage stories. It seems like > > it's the norm nowadays rather than the exception. > > > > I am wondering if it's really only the users that are to

Re: [arch-general] Syncing the mirrors

2010-02-02 Thread hollunder
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-02-02 09:24:47 +0100: > On 02/02/10 18:09, Benoit Favre wrote: > > In any case, there should be more communication towards users about > > what's really going on. > > Like posting a message saying not to update on the front page? That > would have been

Re: [arch-general] xf86-input-evdev conflicts with xorg-server. Remove xorg-server?

2009-12-02 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:26:39 +0100 Xavier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Griffin > wrote: > > > > Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well. > > > > Serious question: does ANYONE have a keyboard that didn't > > automatically work before this debacle? Externa

Re: [arch-general] Frustrating Dependencies

2009-11-23 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:49:19 +0100 Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200 > schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva : > > > I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo. > > Arch is one of the best distros I've used, but when you use a > > (primarily) binary distro

Re: [arch-general] Building iron from source Was:Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

2009-11-21 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:14:55 +0200 nez...@allurelinux.org wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: > > Am Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:35:04 +0200 > > schrieb nez...@allurelinux.org: > > > > > That's not a problem. Source redistribution is allowed so we can > > > host the sour

Re: [arch-general] We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

2009-11-21 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:12:26 +0100 Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:25:13 +0200 > schrieb Ionut Biru : > > > now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and > > the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is > > something that cannot be forgot

Re: [arch-general] We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

2009-11-18 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:42:40 -0200 "Guilherme M. Nogueira" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ionut Biru > wrote: > > > now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and > > the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is > > something that cannot be

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-10-31 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:08:53 +0300 Artyom Smirnov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:01 PM, wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:56 +0300 > > Artyom Smirnov wrote: > > Thanks for viral marketing. > As I know, invited peoples can't invite others, so this is not "viral > marketing" :) > Doesn'

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-10-31 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:56 +0300 Artyom Smirnov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Jeffrey Parke > wrote: > > got an invite for me? > > > > theringmas...@archlinux.us > Sent. > Thanks for viral marketing.

Re: [arch-general] We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:39:54 +0100 Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:58:49 +0100 > schrieb : > > > > Unfortunately, fewer and fewer applications are "desktop-agnostic" > > > these days. To install a gtk2 application I am usually asked to > > > download half of GNOME or at least libgnom

Re: [arch-general] We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:41:58 +0100 JM wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:01 PM, wrote: > >[snip] > > When will "Desktop" people start to see that they are being > > intrusive? They live in their own small bubble called GNOME or KDE > > and can't ever imagine anyone not wanting to use this. > >

Re: [arch-general] Audio on Linux, was: We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:52:28 -0500 Aaron Griffin wrote: > > But honestly, I can see the mess, and from what I know I'd say the > > problem stems from alsa being too difficult to use. The alsa > > developers hide (from a bombardment of user questions) and no one > > feels up to the task of really

[arch-general] Audio on Linux, was: We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:40:44 -0500 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:01 AM, wrote: > > Conclusion: > > Yeah, great, install xorg for a minimal graphical desktop, what you > > get is console-kit, for a minor feature in a monster DE. > > When will "Desktop" people start to see that

Re: [arch-general] We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:49:01 -0500 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:01 AM, wrote: > > Am I happy to hear that. > > I say this because I'm under the impression that people see only two > > kinds of linux uses: > > 1) The traditional server > > 2) The Desktop > > > > You can, at t

Re: [arch-general] We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:41:01 +0100 Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote: > 2009/10/26 RedShift : > > This thread will probably erupt in a massive flamewar, yet I > > decided to post my > > story anyway. I am talking about the desktop experience in general, > > not the technical details behind it. Keep that

Re: [arch-general] How to get libasound_module_pcm_jack.so

2009-10-18 Thread hollunder
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:48:10 +0300 Biru Ionut wrote: > On 10/18/2009 11:47 PM, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > Any idea where to find libasound_module_pcm_jack.so or how to > > compile alsa to get it? > > > > It's probably of no use to the majority of arch users but it's a > > module that has to be e

[arch-general] How to get libasound_module_pcm_jack.so

2009-10-18 Thread hollunder
Any idea where to find libasound_module_pcm_jack.so or how to compile alsa to get it? It's probably of no use to the majority of arch users but it's a module that has to be enabled by hand in asoundrc anyway, so I think it wouldn't hurt to make it available for those that find it useful. Philipp

Re: [arch-general] Netbook recommendations

2009-09-28 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:22:15 -0500 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Roman Kyrylych > wrote: > > * Read reviews, there are lots of them. > >  (even http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_netbooks :)) > > Awesome! Thanks for this I look around for some time and would p

Re: [arch-general] dd and bash_completion

2009-09-24 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:42:20 +0200 Daniel Riedemann wrote: > Hello all, > > I can confirm this behaviour, so it doesn't work for me either. I > switched to zsh and the grml-config... but if you have a solution I > would be also very interested in. > > Regards I just tried it (never used dd) a

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: vim 7.2.245-1

2009-09-23 Thread hollunder
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:35:19 +0400 Jozsef wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > > From: Aaron Griffin > > > > Sent: 09/22/09 07:10 pm > > > > To: General Discusson about Arch Linux > > > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] vim 7.2.245-1 > > > > > > On Mon, Se

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:40:21 +0200 Dario wrote: > Hi! > > In data sabato 05 settembre 2009 12:31:51, Biru Ionut ha scritto: > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15996 > > > > wait for a fix. > > Wow ultrafast answer. Thanks a lot!:) > > ciao! > > Carotinho > Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in t

Re: [arch-general] Audio cd ripper

2009-09-04 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:52:00 +0200 (CEST) "o...@larstennstedt.de" wrote: > Hello, > > I am searching for an audio cd ripper for my Arch Linux box and have > some questions about that. Well, I can recommend rubyripper. It worked well last time I tried it (a few months ago) and afaik it's the best

Re: [arch-general] AUR upload

2009-08-07 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:21:38 -0400 Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm trying to update a PKGBUILD of mine in aur[1], but I get an empty > page a minute or so after clicking submit and nothing is updated... > Am I forgetting something?? > > The PKGBUILD is relatively simple[2]. I even si

Re: [arch-general] OOo Calc max rows

2009-08-07 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:28:42 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: > Hi, I have Calc 3.1.1 installed on two separate machines, one Arch > and other openSUSE10.3 (both from their respective repos, not from > openoffice.org). > Both have a maximum row count of 1048576? I wasn't aware that the > 65536 limit wa

Re: [arch-general] ext3 driver for windows

2009-07-30 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:06:47 -0400 David Rosenstrauch wrote: > Rene Rasmussen wrote: > > What driver do you use for accessing the ext3 partitions? > > I found the following to choose from: > > Ext2 IFS and Ext2 FSD > > > > How is the stability. Did you have any trouble getting it to work? > > >

Re: [arch-general] delete duplicate aur packages

2009-07-23 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:30:11 +0200 vlad wrote: > also please delete jdelay. > project is now called jack_delay, so jdelay is obsolete. > > vlad (AUR name: DonVla) jdelay is just the short name

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:32:45 +0100 Zé Ninguém wrote: > 2009/7/13 Magnus Therning > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs wrote: > > > On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > > >> to the dev: > > >> why not rename vi package to nvi ? > > > > > > +1 to that > > > > Sounds

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:59:51 +0300 Biru Ionut wrote: > hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 > > Manne Merak wrote: > > > >> Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? > >> check last updated date? > >> For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: > Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? > check last updated date? > For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok2-svn, but amarok2-svn was > last updated in beginning of Jun, amarok-svn yesterday. > > Manne Are

Re: [arch-general] Squirrelmail Gotcha

2009-06-17 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:25 -0400 Andrei Thorp wrote: > Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed Jun 17 15:17:24 -0400 > 2009: > > It's either "dazzle them with your brilliance" or "baffle them with > > your bullshit!" The jury is still out on which is more prevalent;-) > > Haha, how's be

Re: [arch-general] Openbox - great lightweight desktop, similar to icewm, but better in several regards

2009-06-10 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:24:06 -0400 David Rosenstrauch wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > > After reading the newsletter article about old boxes with > > minimal hardware collecting dust in a closet, I thought about the > > openbox desktop I had just given a run-through and

Re: [arch-general] libnotify as optdepend in thunar?

2009-04-25 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:19:58 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:49, wrote: > > Hmm, but thunar-volman is not installed on my system.. > > > > Regards, > > Philipp > > > > Hmmm... I guess I don't know the software as well as I thought I did. > I thought that addon was what

Re: [arch-general] libnotify as optdepend in thunar?

2009-04-25 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:13:01 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 04:20, wrote: > > Well, it didn't unmount the thumbdrive and gave me the popup that > > said that libnotify was missing so I'd say missing depend. But > > otherwise thunar worked, and we have a number of packages

Re: [arch-general] libnotify as optdepend in thunar?

2009-04-25 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:59:00 -0700 Andrei Thorp wrote: > Was it a warning or an error? If it was just a warning and thunar did > the right thing regardless, it sounds like it's a missing optdepends > as you say. If it actually stopped working or was hindered in some > way, it's probably a missing

Re: [arch-general] libsoup 2.26.0-1 dependencies in [testing]

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:24 +0300 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:33 +0200, JM wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot > > >> wrote: > > >> > O

[arch-general] libnotify as optdepend in thunar?

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
Hi there, today when I tried to unmount a thumbdrive in thunar I got an error message about missing libnotify. It worked after I installed it. Did I do something wrong or is it just missing in the optdepends array? Regards, Philipp

Re: [arch-general] system-config-printer without executable?

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:24:24 +0200 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > 2009/4/24 Jan de Groot : > > Why add a .install file if you can use optdepends also to suggest > > installation of the -gnome frontend? You might also want to move the > > -gnome frontend to extra then. > you are right for optdepends. I

Re: [arch-general] system-config-printer without executable?

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:11:09 +0200 Jan de Groot wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:48 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:35:14 +0300 > > Samed Beyribey wrote: > > > > > > Other users report to have a system-config-printer.py there but > > > > such a file doesn't exist on m

Re: [arch-general] system-config-printer without executable?

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:35:14 +0300 Samed Beyribey wrote: > > Other users report to have a system-config-printer.py there but > > such a file doesn't exist on my system. > > > It's in system-config-printer-gnome package. > > Regards, > Samed. How do I have to understand that? System-config-prin

[arch-general] system-config-printer without executable?

2009-04-24 Thread hollunder
Hi there, I just tried the latest version of system-config-printer from [extra] and couldn't find an executable. It installs some stuff here: $ ls /usr/share/system-config-printer/ config.py cupshelpers.py debug.py ppds.py smburi.py Other users report to have a system-config-printer.py there

Re: [arch-general] namcap wiki page

2009-04-10 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:32:08 +0530 Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > I made a wiki page on namcap: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Namcap > Could someone go through the page and point out any errors or > omissions, especially in the "Making a namcap module" section? > > It'd be nice if this pag

Re: [arch-general] Bug reports for out of date packages?

2009-04-10 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:45:46 -0400 Ryan Sims wrote: > 2009/4/9 Allan McRae : > > hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > >> > >> jack-audio-connection-kit, qjackctl and ardour, all in > >> extra, have been out of date...   > >> > > > > So, does anyone have working updated PKGBUILDs for these that I can > > push

Re: [arch-general] Bug reports for out of date packages?

2009-04-07 Thread hollunder
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:41:00 +0200 ludovic coues wrote: > I suppose that some maintainer are not looking as often as some > people from the arch's > community want to there package. > > Couldn't be multiple maintainer for package ? Some of us (archaudio people) wished that was possible in AUR a

Re: [arch-general] Bug reports for out of date packages?

2009-04-06 Thread hollunder
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:37:14 +0200 Ondřej Kučera wrote: > Hi, > > Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and > the system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package out of > date to get dev's/TU's attention" works fine. But sometimes there > exist packages both in

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [arch-announce] Dropping i686 support]

2009-04-01 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:17:47 -0300 "Cesar G. Miguel" wrote: > > Wondering why nobody is this thread mentions that today is 1st > > April.. LOL.. > > It depends on where you live to be April 1st :-) > > Let's drop the support for Google [1], Firefox and, of course, Arch > i686 :-) > > Happy Apr,

Re: [arch-general] Surviving without X

2009-03-30 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:47:50 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum wrote: > I only use the X when I draw or watch a video, rather well, as saving > memory. > > There is a very interesting package that can watch videos without FB, > only in text mode, it is called aaxine and cacaxine. > Also use the mplayer wi

[arch-general] id3tag pkgconfig: unrecognized option '-zf'

2009-03-25 Thread hollunder
r/lib -lsvframework -lsvaudioio -lsvview -lsvlayer -lsvrdf -lsvtransform -lsvwidgets -lsvdata -lsvplugin -lsvbase -lsvsystem -lbz2 -L/home/hollunder/builds/vamp-plugin-sdk/pkg/usr/lib -lvamp-hostsdk -loggz -lfishsound -lvorbisenc -lspeex -lvorbis -logg -lmad -zf -lid3tag -lrubberband -lfftw3 -lfftw3f -lsn

Re: [arch-general] how to mount external hdd

2009-02-20 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:33:01 +0100 wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:13 -0300 > Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Manucharian > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:03:08 +0100 > > > wrote: > > > > > > .. > > > > > >> An external dr

Re: [arch-general] how to mount external hdd

2009-02-19 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:13 -0300 Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Manucharian > wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:03:08 +0100 > > wrote: > > > > .. > > > >> An external drive can be rather reliably identified and always > >> mounted at t

Re: [arch-general] how to mount external hdd

2009-02-18 Thread hollunder
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:26:37 +0100 RedShift wrote: > Preston C. wrote: > > I think that this is a simple question. How do I mount an external > > hard drive before I log into my desktop? Thanks > > > > > > You have been asking all these newbie questions while these have been > widely covered b