On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Kurt J. Bosch
wrote:
> Am 2010-08-14 21:48, schrieb Laurent Carlier:
>>
>> You should fill a bugreport as there is security issues
>>
> No. Last time I did this it was rejected -
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10679
That reject was plain wrong, we should encoura
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
>
> This is the reason why we need package signing for Pacman. I'm aware
> that some progress has been made and it's being worked on. Are there
> any updates?
>
It's all there : http://projects.archlinux.org/users/allan/pacman.git/log/?h=
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Kazuo Teramoto wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Check every checksum that makepkg supports rather than only md5sums.
>> Fixes FS#17168.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae
>> ---
>>
>> I am sure there has to be some way to loop through a
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt wrote:
>
> Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but
> currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous
> for your system.
> Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
> So if you can't live w
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 27 May 2010 14:43 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>> Dozens of people have contributed to the discussion, but no one
>> actually cares about getting some clarifications ?
>> I just don't get it.
>> I fee
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Xavier Chantry
wrote:
> Then, if you want to do something about it, just go ahead and talk
> with these people Joerg kindly mentioned.
> Ask them whether they agree or disagree with Eben's interpretation
> that GPL compliance on mkisofs i
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, wrote:
>
> Looking at the xrun statistics in function of audio period size,
> it looks like current nouveau is blocking audio (either by dis-
> abling interrupts, or by locking a shared HW resource) for about
> 3-4 ms. *No* driver today should ever do that - it's
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:32 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> at the possibility of playing devils advocate, i don't see anything
> outrageous by Jeorg's claims... even after reading the full 40+
> messages twice and the "yay" thread started afterwards.
>
Sorry to inform you that you did not rea
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> [about time we changed the subject]
>>
>> Joerg,
>>
>> Even given you are correct about licensing terms (which I do not care to
>> dispute), currently all risk lies on the distributor. Given many
>> distributions h
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Xavier Chantry
wrote:
>
> Also note the first item about latency on this page :
> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/ToDo
>
Ah now I remember where this latency TODO came from, there actually
was one report about bad latency earlier that month (feb
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Philipp Überbacher
wrote:
>
> Sadly audio performance / locks /latency seems to be not on graphics driver
> developers
> minds at all.
It's definitely not their primary focus. But if you open a bug report
saying "that commit greatly increased latency" and you can
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:32 AM, wrote:
>
> I don't mind having to tweak things, do a lot of configuration
> manually, etc. etc., but I do expect things to work when they
> go into core/extra, or at least have a fallback available.
> There is none, AFAICS.
>
I don't know what you are saying. Ju
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:00 PM, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> over the past few months I have installed Arch on a number of
> systems, all of them used for quite intensive audio work (think
> of systems with > 1000 jack ports). All of them have worked
> flawlessly, no latency problems even with the s
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Rasmus Steinke wrote:
>
> Jörg has a point. While of course being biased about his pet cdrtools,
> cdrkit is not on par with cdrtools in any way.
> Those updates you mention more or less only consist of small fixes, no
> progess at all in that package.
>
> The ONL
2010/5/23 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 23:07 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 22:49, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> >
>> > What ? Is that really true ?!?!? State some link where it is officially
>> > declared by the developers.
>> Joerg is the author of the software he
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>
> or write this to /etc/profile:
> alias pacman='http_proxy=.. ftp_proxy=.. pacman'
>
I would suggest that last way, either an alias or shell function or
shell wrapper.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 02:04:41 +0200
> "Andre \"Osku\" Schmidt" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:41:12 +0200
>> > "Andre \"Osku\" Schmidt" wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> just give
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Aaron Griffin
>> wrote:
>>> Came across my reader today
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_arch_faster&num=1
>>>
>>> Pretty
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> The vim runtime that can be retrieved via rsync is outdated.
>
> Some of the patches modify the runtime, and some of these changes
> (e.g. 394) are lost when the runtime is overwritten with the runtime
> from rsync.
>
> Not using the runtime f
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/05/10 02:06, Loui Chang wrote:
>>
>> On Sun 09 May 2010 16:21 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sourcing is d
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>
> Yeah I've thought about this as well. Source packages could have a
> similar format as binary packages with a .PKGINFO file to present the
> metadata in an easily parsable format.
>
> You can read some of my incomplete brainstormings here:
> ht
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> Sourcing is dangerous if the PKGBUILD is from an untrusted source. It also
> fails with package splitting...
>
Makes me wonder why pkgbuilds are written in bash. Sounds like a big
design flaw.
But it depends on what our needs are :
1) we do
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:43 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have had vim and gvim installed side by side for 6 months+, today
> during
> update, pacman wanted to remove vim because it now conflicts with gvim. So I
> removed gvim and updated. What is the conflict? Why a conflict n
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
wrote:
>
> All this is probably unrelated to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43987, but perhaps
> it will save some time for someone, as your post about busybox helped me.
> I'll wait for a new gcc package before reporting a gcc bug.
>
IMO you should report
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
>> Hi archers,
>>
>> If you believe the comment on Mozilla's bugtracker [1] and the change
>> to the license file [2], the previously non-free Firefox graphics are
>> now licensed under the MP
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
> I know this is a silly reason, but this is the general trend I've observed
> dealing with people in real life and on the internet. They fear from using
> Linux because they think it has no GUI or it is bad.
>
Well that's not complete
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
> That's the main aim for which I want to do this. By showing them the
> screenshots which will look "awesome" to them, it may be possible to win
> their minds.
>
This is the silliest reason I've ever heard for switching to Linux.
Her
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Michishige Kaito
wrote:
>>
>> Anti-aliasing is turned off for
>> small point sizes and turned on for larger sizes.
>>
>> Denis.
>>
>
> I'd be very interested in finding out how this is controlled. Could you
> point me at a resource on the topic?
>
http://wiki.arch
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:41 -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> > Things todo before this merges to extra:
>> > - Fix xf86-video-siliconmotion, xf86-video-unichrome, xf86-video-nouveau
>>
>> I'm
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Allan.
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 17/04/10 00:03, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, what is the plan regarding this issue (quoted
>>> from the gcc changelog):
>
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Trying to update and I received:
>
> 05:15 nirvana:~/img/pics/portraits/dcr> pms -u
> :: Synchronizing package databases...
> core is up to date
> extra is up to date
> community is up to date
> archlinuxfr is up to da
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, bardo wrote:
> 2010/4/9 David Rosenstrauch :
>> * I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that look like this:
>> expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1 line 8 of xfree86
>>
>>
>> W T F ? ! ?
>
> Not sure it's the same problem, but I experienced somethin
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:05 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On Thu, April 8, 2010 9:51 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>> So WTF?!?!?!? Hal sees the keyboard. And xev running inside the x
>> session sees the keyboard. SO WHY ON EARTH IS MY KEYBOARD STILL DEAD IN
>> MY X SESSIONS?!?!? AG
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:35 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 09:55 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>> On 04/07/2010 10:46 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>>> Can you attach full Xorg log and config ?
>>
>> I'm not using any xorg config. Log is at:
>
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
> Anybody have any ideas on this? GUI is completely unusable on the server
> until I solve this! :-(
>
> I really have zero idea what's going on. And it's a difficult thing to find
> good specific search terms for, as there's been nume
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:32 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> I upgraded my extremely not-up-to-date server last night (523 packages
> upgraded). The upgrade generally went well, except for one significant
> issue: the keyboard is no longer working under Xorg. It works fine in a
> command line tt
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Alain Muls wrote:
>
> That is exactly what I did. I am not a beginner and have read quite some
> articles about Arch and I am aware of the fact that I have to follow
> carefully all steps in this installation process. So pleas bear with me and
> hep me over this pr
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:54:48 +0200
> schrieb Xavier Chantry :
>
>> Heh cmus is probably my preferred player now so I ought to defend it.
>>
>> Too complicated, seriously ? The only command I ever need is the
>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:10:22 +0800
> schrieb Ian-Xue Li :
>
>> As for MOC, I recommend cmus over MOC because it got more decoder over
>> different types files.
>
> Well, just tried cmus. It's so complicated an unintuitive. If I need to
> first
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> Could somebody recommend another media player I could try that will let me
> create temporary music lists on the fly by typing the path to a parent
> dir containing multiple music directories???
>
I don't know any music player tha
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Xavier Chantry
wrote:
>
> A very quick look at the git repo :
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grep.git/commit/?id=54d55bba41f2ff31682fe6523ef6f49b37a0e20f
>
> I just love these easy to browse web interface :)
>
2.6.2 released which inclu
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Andrea Scarpino
> wrote:
>> On Friday 26 March 2010 13:57:08 Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Upstream bug fix release.
>>>
>>> Signoff both,
>>> Allan
>> I got a segfault when I do:
>> $ grep -qrl --include "desc" "^pac
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Giovanni Scafora
wrote:
> Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
>>
>> Repository : extra
>> Name : gsfonts
>> Version : 1.0.7pre44-1
>> Installed : 8.11-5
>> URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
>>
>> I'm assumi
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream big update.
>
> Local changelog:
> - Removed the multibyte locale speed-up patch (and all the patches to fix
> the issues it created...) as it is now included upstream.
> - Removed the other patches as it appears they are not being
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> This is definitely NOT SAFE!
>
> If you don't have /dev/shm, POSIX shared memory will use the same tmpfs
> filesystem as /dev, which is currently limited to 10MB - POSIX shared
> memory blocks might be much larger.
>
> As for removing /dev
Tobias, did you receive the last mail from dmraid developer ?
It seems we can solve this problem in a better way now with just a
runtime option. And keep just the dynamic binary.
I will see if I can get that running and working.
Or do you still want to temporarily re-add static dmraid despites tha
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
> Hi archers,
>
> It has been repeated a lot of times that doing piecemeal updates with
> pacman -Sy pkgname is not a very good idea. What about ignoring
> packages? Is it as dangerous?
>
> And a more general question: is it even theoretically
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> 1) what allan said :
>> A group could monitor security issues and file bugs to get the devs to
>> fix them.
>
> Is there any evidence that this is actually needed?
>
No, Allan asked for some numbers, and I am curious too.
> My impres
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> After a quick look at it I don't see much that would apply though. Arch
> doesn't have releases. Arch follows upstream releases very closes (in some
> cases even too closely ;-)
>
> So, if there is no need for backporting to a set of pac
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> I do not see all reopen requests, but the need to "beg" seems overstated...
> I do know that it is much, much easier to get a bug reopened if the request
> is clear and well justified. A large portion of reopen requests provide no
> informa
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 13/03/10 08:35, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>
>> In my eyes, I imagine the kind of people who want this feature simply
>> wish to argue about the closing. I've had to deal with enough PM
>> requests in t
2010/3/11 David C. Rankin :
> On 03/11/2010 09:50 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>> If all else fails, blame Allan. Oh, and tell the maintainer what failed.
>>
>
> Gotcha!
>
> I just posted the new PKGBUILD files as 'comments' to the AUR package
> and sent
> Chris (the maintainer) an email telling hi
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> Not really...
>
> The problem is that pacman does not clean up packages installed as a
> dependency for a package that are no longer needed due to an update which
> removed that dep.
>
And by the way, we cannot be 100% sure that the 'no lon
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> It seems like this is a "solution" that's looking for a problem to
> happen. As far as I know, working with svn isn't a big deal and isn't
> a problem.
>
Just a side-note : I discovered git svn today, it's really a blessing !
I very rarely ha
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> The only way for this to actually happen would be for someone to set up a
> git repo with a handful of packages and demonstrate that it works better
> with the usual packaging workflow. That is what was done with SVN and why
> it was chosen wh
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:14 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:49:01PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> The only viable solution I could think of is using one git repository
>> per package - and that is just crazy.
>
> I wonder, is it really that crazy ?
>
> I've been looking into git as a
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:51:30 +0100
> Stefan Husmann wrote:
>
>> > 4) users can check out older versions of packages easily, with
>> > limited storage overhead.
>> Do you want to store binary packages in the git repo? Maybe I
>> misundersta
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
wrote:
>
> I use mutt with a nifty little binding that automagically jumps to the last
> blank line in the file when it opens a message for reply :P
> --
>
Well with mutt you can use a decent text editor which will allow you
do that
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
>
> Bottom posting shows its downside only when you recently joined a
> mailing list, for example - you start receiving emails from threads
> that have been going for a long time and you have no idea what people
> are discussing. But if you're
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. März 2010 14:06:57 schrieb Dan McGee:
>> > and here we have another reason to punish anybody using versioned
>> > dependencies. ;-) (of course upstream needs to be hit, too)
>>
>> Blaming this on versioned deps is punishing th
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. März 2010 09:39:19 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> Personally, I would like to
>> remove everything but basic ethernet support from initscripts (that
>> would also include removing wireless, but some people were too strictly
>> ag
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:57 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I don't know who does the wiki editing on the "Installing with Fake RAID"
> page,
> but a lot of the helpful information was deleted and it has been edited down
> to
> the point that it is confusing.
>
You seriously don't know
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 28/02/10 19:10, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 16:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> kernel 2.6.33 first test run ...
>>
>>> Enjoy have fun and give me feedback,
>>
>> I have Intel 965GM video and I get
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
wrote:
> Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
>> Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand?
> <...>
>> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible?
> <...>
>
> Samba is growing up fast.
> It is long known upstream ( http:/
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Thayer Williams wrote:
>
> Bumping this for feedback. 7z correctly unzips localized win32 zip
> files, but bsdtar/unzip cannot. Is that good enough to remove the
> conflicting win32 patches from unzip?
>
Links to feature request for adding support to bsdtar / un
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Stefano Z. wrote:
> hi
>
> i've bought a new notebook (hp pavilion dm1-1150sl) and installed
> archlinux.
> i have see a strange thing with powertop, i'm running the vanilla arch
> kernel26,
> and i have see this behaviour:
> Cn Avg residency
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>
> Bad thing it's still kind of unknown how to solve or to work around
> it. Well, the work around is not to use xscreensaver, :-(. I don't
> remember if I can get xlockmore to lock when there's no activity...
> Well, I'll have to look int
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
>
> Downgrading libdrm makes X work again. Is this already being worked
> on, or should I open a bug? If so, against which package, libdrm or
> xf86-video-nouveau?
>
You need to upgrade and rebuild both xf86-video-nouveau and nouveau-drm.
File a
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Or add the following to .vimrc or /etc/vimrc:
>> runtime vimrc_example.vim
>> to enable other features that you are probably used to
>
> Yeah this is a lot better :)
>
I started by just including it with runtime.
But finally I
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> I think we may have this fixed in pacman-git, but Nagy or Xavier would
> know for sure...
>
That documentation from man PKGBUILD still applies, I don't think we
ever considered it as a bug/problem :
replaces (array)
An arra
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
> One reason that it takes time to get signoffs for certain packages is
> that we don't know if enough devs use it to get the required signoff.
> For instance, I don't use openvpn. How many devs use openvpn? I don't
> know and probably no-one
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 09/02/10 19:50, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, care to explain what you are rewriting pacman for ? There are
>> probably plenty of good reasons to do that, I am just curious to know
>> if you have any:)
&g
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>
> if someone actually posts patches or other constructive stuff, please CC
> me. We're rewriting pacman anyway and looking for a solution to handle
> this mess in particular.
>
> Right now the only idea i got is versioned deps which is sort o
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>
> The point is that it moved to the staging tree now, where further
> development will take place. After a while, there won't be an
> out-of-tree version anymore because all development happens in the
> official kernel git tree.
> An example of
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:52 +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>> It seems the question was not only about kms but also about dri2,
>> which is needed to get 3d support with kms.
>>
>> About nouveau, ums was dropped f
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have a suggestion to possibly make rebuilds a bit less painful (or
>> non-existant). I think this is a good idea because it seems like right now,
>> even before ther
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> It will be supported as .33 will ship kms.
> Right now .32 supports kms for ati and intel cards, nouveau is optional.
>
It seems the question was not only about kms but also about dri2,
which is needed to get 3d support with kms.
About
I also hope this helps somehow.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Karl Berry via RT
Date: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:42 AM
Subject: [gnu.org #544172] Fwd: [arch-general] An old, tiresome
discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit
To: chantry.xav...@gmail.com
Hello Xavier,
Eben just sent me this sum
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
> Urmm..if it is so important, Arch gives you the power to roll your own
> kernel. Heck, I don't even have a fallback, because I don't need it.
> Like Fons, I have an RT kernel, and a normal kernel. Either acts as a
> backup of the other, since n
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 01/02/10 13:08, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the last
>> person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). I do not use it and have no
>> intentions of fixing the bug. Does anybody want to be
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> Sounds like the real problem is pacman's message then. My suggestion:
> change "package x has been replaced by package y" to "package x has been
> renamed package y".
>
fork/alternative != rename
The term 'replace' is more general than a ren
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM, ludovic coues wrote:
>>
>> WAIT WHAT?
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/kernel26-lts/
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/kernel26-lts/
>>
>
> lts is not for everyday desktop usage.
>
Who said anything about desktop usage ?
It is useful fo
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Finally some interesting discussion came out of this. I am not an expert on
> linux capability support, but Thomas has posted two blog entries about this in
> Arch: http://archlinux.me/brain0/2009/07/28/using-posix-capabilities-in-linux-
> p
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:19 +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the only reason I did not move cdrtools to community was that license
>> reason. So if that is no showstopper anymore, I can maintain it.
>>
>> Regards Stef
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 15:45 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Just to make it clear:
>>>
>>> There is not a single claim from a lawyer that confirms the claims
>>> from
>>> the hostile
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> If you want to read up on the different sound components, just do a
> google search. There's tons of articles out there, some very good,
> mostly a bit crap. Lennart Pottering (dev for Pulse) has a
> particularly good one I recall. Most on Arc
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Thayer Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Javier Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Bad thing that xscreensaver corrupted / so that it couldn't be
>> unlocked, and under console there was no way to loging, some misplaced
>> inodes or something...
>>
>> Hard reb
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:46 PM, wrote:
>
> Meanwhile I installed nouveau. The only difference I notice
> is that now the 'visual bell' in xterm has become very slow
> as well (to the point of being unusable), also locally.
>
I suspect you did not install it properly and were running in noaccel
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:04 AM, wrote:
>
> It is the 'ssh -X zita2 emacs' that is very slow.
> Running emacs locally is perfectly OK.
> The previous install was F9, it used nv, and
> the same 'ssh -X zita2 emacs' worked perfectly.
> Nothing has changed on zita2.
>
> As far as I can see, the Arch
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Today I installed Arch on my desktop which previously had Fedora.
> All works well except
>
> ssh -X zita2 emacs
>
> where zita2 is my laptop.
>
> It works, but it is ex tre me ly slow, I can count
> the lines being displayed when scrolli
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Steve Holmes
> wrote:
>> Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse
>> chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and
>> nobody seems to complain about that concept.
>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
> Often times it's the user configuration files that mess up a system,
> so keep that in mind unless you're really confident it's all in the
> packages themselves.
>
> And if you're thinking of reinstalling a la pacman -S $(comm -3
> <(pacman -Q
92 matches
Mail list logo
