> I was reading this and it reminded me of what you said Anthony:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
>
> --
> Jonathan Vasquez
I'm definitely going to be moving back to my old drive (with the old
partition style /dev/sda1 EF02, /dev/sda2 ALL LVM (Boot, /, , sw
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Simplicity and minimalism would be what motivates me the most. If I
&
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>>
>> Simplicity and minimalism would be what motivates me the most. If I
>> don't need an initramfs to get my system boot up, why have one
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:19 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
>> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
>> doesn&#
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
> doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
>
> --
> Jonathan Vasqu
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> but should the initramfs be integrated enough into
>> the system where the output messages don't get displayed?)
>
> I think the initscripts produ
Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
mple cases - at
>> least that is the direction we are moving towards.
>>
>
> You are correct. It simplifies it in a lot of ways, also complicates
> it as well since you need an extra set of files (included in the
> initramfs).
>
> Thanks for the wonderful response. I re
tage 5" terminology, because that feels
> way too gentoo-specific.
I guess Gentoo/Funtoo terminology has been rubbing onto me ;)
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> What it has to do with Arch is more information inside the wiki.
>
> We do have
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Backup#Not_incremental_backups
&g
of stage5). Since there isn't any information on
this inside our quality documentation, why not add it?
--
Jonathan Vasquez
s, etc
3. Install GRUB (or any other bootloader)
--
Jonathan Vasquez
for
this, so I was thinking that maybe I can write one once I learn more
about it. Anyone think this is necessary?
--
Jonathan Vasquez
>
> -Andy
Thanks. I'm definitely for splitting packages where they must be
split. Keep up the good work.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
cases - at
> least that is the direction we are moving towards.
>
You are correct. It simplifies it in a lot of ways, also complicates
it as well since you need an extra set of files (included in the
initramfs).
Thanks for the wonderful response. I really enjoyed reading it.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> So I've been experimenting on removing my use of initrd and using the
>> kernel directly.
>>
>> My current setu
).
--
Jonathan Vasquez
her ways to simplify the system, and I'm not
against using initrd in any way, but it's something that I would not
want to use, or learn not to be dependent on.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
was thinking about. These are the
KDE packages I have installed, very small:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/532060/
I start kde via inittab.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 8, 2012 12:27 PM, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Peter Lewis
wrote:
> >> This is done via policykit.
> >
> > Would I need some optdepend installed or some daemon started to make
this
> > work? I notice that I have polkit-qt installed, but I don't think I've
ever
On Jan 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Peter Nikolic" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 07 January 2012 18:19:14 Frederic Bezies wrote:
> > On 07/01/2012 18:21, Peter Nikolic wrote:
> > > Right i promise i will try to make this the last one for a while
really
> > > ..
> > >
> > > I have Libreoffice 3.4.4 installed BUT i
On Jan 7, 2012 7:37 AM, "Allan McRae" wrote:
>
> On 07/01/12 22:30, Corrado Primier wrote:
> > 2012/1/7 Don Juan :
> >> The problem I have run into and can not seem to find info about or
something
> >> I have ever run into is that it seems bsdtar when extracting is making
the
> >> name as name_2.0
On Jan 7, 2012 4:23 AM, "Kwpolska" wrote:
>
> 2012/1/7 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
> > 2012/1/7 Don deJuan :
> >> On 01/07/2012 01:05 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 01/07/2012 10:37 AM, Peter Nikolic wrote:
>
> Morning all
>
> well installed Arch still a few small glitches to s
On Jan 7, 2012 4:15 AM, "郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)"
wrote:
>
> 2012/1/7 Don deJuan :
> > On 01/07/2012 01:05 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01/07/2012 10:37 AM, Peter Nikolic wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Morning all
> >>>
> >>> well installed Arch still a few small glitches to solve but looking
good
> >>>
> >
On Jan 7, 2012 3:38 AM, "Peter Nikolic" wrote:
>
> Morning all
>
> well installed Arch still a few small glitches to solve but looking good
>
> Pete .
>
> --
> Powered by openSUSE 11.3 (x86_64) Kernel: 2.6.34.10-0.4-desktop
> KDE Development Platform: 4.6.5 (4.6.5) "release 7"
> 08:36 up 23:40,
On Jan 6, 2012 3:27 AM, "Tobias Powalowski" <
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Am 06.01.2012 02:58, schrieb Jonathan Vasquez:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski
> > wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> please signoff 3.2 ser
& Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
You might want to hold off on that sign off. There is a Regression Bug
affecting Intel users in the final source of 3.2
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAzNzk
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 4, 2012 6:26 PM, "Peter Lewis" wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 16:16:45 Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> > > Never said the entire community was a democracy, I did say thought
> > > that like a democracy people vote for the packages to be included.
> >
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Are you sure TUs pay attention to votes (apart from the minimum required
>> number)? I always just pulled the packages I wanted...
>>
https://wiki.archlinu
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 05/01/12 07:14, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
>>> wrote:
>>>> That's how democra
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>> That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens.
>>> Sa
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens.
>> Same goes with the AUR, and when people vote for packages
>> for inclusion in
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Don Juan wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 08:14 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:25:40 -0500
>> Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Just because a person didn't go to
>>> me
On Jan 4, 2012 3:27 PM, "Jonathan Vasquez" wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012 11:34 AM, "Javier Vasquez" wrote:
> >
> > On 1/3/12, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > OMG Javier did learn how to bottom-post!
> > >
> &
On Jan 4, 2012 11:34 AM, "Javier Vasquez" wrote:
>
> On 1/3/12, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > OMG Javier did learn how to bottom-post!
> >
> > Congratulations \o/
> >
> > - --
> > Angel Velásquez
>
>
> I'm afraid the Javier you're referring to is another one, :-) I've
> seen a more acti
On Jan 4, 2012 11:32 AM, "gt" wrote:
>
> Hello folks
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to rebuild a custom live disc, using
> archiso, without having to download all the packages over again.
>
> The problem is that after making a few changes to the configuration,
> mainly inside root-image dir
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Pham Bao Trung
wrote:
> @Jonathan Vasquez
>
> I must say that I totally support your point of view. I have seen some
> TU/devs/geeky users showed bad temper, mocking on newb at #archlinux who
> really came there to seek for help and wanted to switc
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>> I've been doing things to attract users to Arch. Whether they are
>>> newbs or n
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> I've been doing things to attract users to Arch. Whether they are
>> newbs or not, because I want people to learn. As long as you have
>> willingness and
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:58:34 -0500
> Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
>
>> Before you speak about what attitudes I supposedly have.. why don't
>> you search my forum name "Cows", and see my contributions. I mostly
&
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-01-03 21:47:56 -0500] Jonathan Vasquez:
>> I'm tired of seeing this type of attitude from the Linux community.
>
> The Linux community is tired of seeing this type of attitude from you too.
>
>> If peopl
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Martin wrote:
> Please stop fighting, this list is intended for technical discussions and
> not personal problems.
>
>
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:44:10 -0300, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Gaetan Bisson
&g
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-01-03 21:30:25 -0500] Jonathan Vasquez:
>> How do you think problems will ever get solved?
>
> When somebody actually *investigates* the issue, as opposed to
> incoherently describe random aspects of their setup an
3, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-01-03 20:27:57 -0500] Jonathan Vasquez:
>> It seems like you are just trolling on people that have legitimate
>> questions. Signal to Noise increased.
>
> Exactly!
>
> Even Angel's troll brings more signal to this discuss
2012/1/3 Angel Velásquez :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/01/12 20:15, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> On 1/3/12, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>> On 1/3/12, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
>
checked (2 secs ago) resume hook should go before filesystems.
>
> --
> Alex
>
I have this but my comp as I said before doesn't even get to suspend
in the first place since it gets stuck at the black screen just before
suspending:
HOOKS="base udev scsi sata lvm2 resume filesystems usbinput"
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Fabio Mancinelli
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I switched from nVidia proprietary drivers, that had some window
> redrawing issues, to nouveau.
>
> This fixed the redrawing issues but made my laptop start to freeze on
> suspend (with the proprietary driver, suspend wo
On Jan 1, 2012 8:56 PM, "Jesse Juhani Jaara" wrote:
>
> You should never do anything like that in Arch. ALWAYS use the PKGBUILD,
when
> it might save you a a hell of lot time, wich might othervice go into all
sorts
> of tinkering, expecially when installing binary only stuff. You are going
to
> ru
You too man. Enjoy :)
On Dec 31, 2011 8:38 AM, "Kirill Churin" wrote:
>Hello, fellow Archers!
>
>Some of you (Far East and Asia and Pacific) celebrated it already,
> some of you still preparing (my place, Urals, are getting excited
> too), but I want to congratulate you all, regardless of
e:
> > > > http:///trinity.bildanet.com/i686
> > >
> > > Have you tried with 2 '/' (slashes) after 'http:' instead of 3?
> >
> > No I have not.
> >
> > I tried that and it now works
> >
> > Thank you
> >
>
> you should make those public :-)
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
You are correct. I just let my email application automatically handle the
quoting.
On Dec 29, 2011 3:47 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:12:53 -0500
> schrieb Jonathan Vasquez :
>
> > Hmm I always reply in a top post way since I see it as a faster way
&
st =)
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
> > I would go with either
> >
> > /lib/modules/extramodules//
> >
> > or
> >
> > /lib/modules//extramodules/
> >
> > But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just
I would go with either
/lib/modules/extramodules//
or
/lib/modules//extramodules/
But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just picky about directory
structure.
On Dec 29, 2011 2:40 AM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of nvidia-beta-all -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31
Yup it is QA for Arch's model which is what I was going to yell you when I
started reading your response ;).
It depends how you implement QA.
On Dec 23, 2011 4:31 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> Am Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:52:13 -0500
> schrieb Jonathan Vasquez :
>
> > Let
Let's not forget Loui, We are all human and make mistakes. A QA process is
definitely a good thing.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Fri 23 Dec 2011 10:42 +, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> > On Friday 23 Dec 2011 05:32:25 Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> > >
Haha alright thanks :)
On Dec 23, 2011 2:21 PM, "Stefan Wilkens" wrote:
> 2011/12/23 Jonathan Vasquez :
> > I agree with Paul and Peter. People cant be treating others like crap
> just
> > because they are asking for help. If you don't have anything better to
I agree with Paul and Peter. People cant be treating others like crap just
because they are asking for help. If you don't have anything better to say,
then just be quiet and filter, you don't have to contribute. I've only been
on these mailing lists for a few days and I know most people aren't like
.
-Jon
On Dec 23, 2011 5:47 AM, "Allan McRae" wrote:
> On 23/12/11 20:41, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> > Thanks for the response. Do you consider Arch a production system or more
> > of a hobby project? Meaning more like a side system and not a main one.
>
> I have used i
Thanks for the response. Do you consider Arch a production system or more
of a hobby project? Meaning more like a side system and not a main one.
On Dec 23, 2011 5:39 AM, "Allan McRae" wrote:
> On 23/12/11 20:32, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
>
ros aren't serious distros that aren't meant for
production? I mean I understand that Arch is rolling release and all
that, but it's packages are marked stable by their corresponding
upstreams.
What are your opinions about this?
--
Jonathan Vasquez
ssue here ... I suggest moving forward
> until a
> > concrete problem is encountered, or running headless.
> >
> > While I'm not into pro audio, I do use PA successfully on several
> machines
> > daily with great satisfaction and zero issue; be sure you understand the
> > difference between ALSA, alsa-lib, and PA.
>
> It already is an issue. I don't need PA for my work. Even if it should
> cause no issue, I don't need it.
>
> - Ralf
>
>
>
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
rg/viewtopic.php?pid=928817#p928817
>
> So I should install PA, while not using it? Is this the interpretation
> of KISS by Arch Linux?
>
> I already have written that I'll use a HDSP card = HDSP mixer, a desktop
> mixer thingy won't be able to handle such an audio card and my sound
> server will be Jack with ALSA backend.
>
> - Ralf
>
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
ependencies)
> > :: gnome-settings-daemon: requires pulseaudio
> > :: pulseaudio-alsa: requires pulseaudio
> >
> >
> >
>
> ok then, gnome requires pulseaudio. The only way to get rid of
> pulseaudio is to get rid of gnome.
>
> --
> Ionuț
>
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
; > libpulse?
>
> # pacman -Rss pulseaudio
> checking dependencies...
> error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
> :: gnome-settings-daemon: requires pulseaudio
> :: pulseaudio-alsa: requires pulseaudio
>
>
>
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
of pacmatic [1]. It's really an
> useful tool, especially if you don't check regularly the news (as you
> should).
>
> [1] http://kmkeen.com/pacmatic/
>
> Regards,
>
> Lorenzo
> --
> Nothing is interesting if you're not interested.
>
--
Jonathan Vasquez
It's posted on the main page :)
On Dec 22, 2011 11:27 AM, "David C. Rankin"
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Just a quick question. Upgrade failed due to conflict with mtab:
>
>
> (67/67) checking for file conflicts
> [###] 100%
> error: failed to commit transaction (confl
66 matches
Mail list logo
