Hello!
I hate every Haskell package related thing, so take what I say with a
grain of salt. Have you considered using cblrepo? It's working fine for
me, even for packages they didn't have yet.
They have binary packages in an unofficial repository
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_u
Hi,
Since you ask for advice in general, I would recommend maybe trying a
different window manager or desktop environment. Cinnamon is nice
especially because of its visual appeal, and for its default visual
similarity to the traditional Windows desktop; but not so much for
customising stuff.
Wha
A 2017-07-24T07:54:02 +, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general escreveu:
> I've installed ArchLinux on 3 desktops so far, and I've done them
> successfully, so I must have *RTFM* , I was just wondering why is it
> hard to configure wifi. Since I failed to configure wifi with
> wpa_supplicant. I'll
A 2017-04-05T10:44:05 +0200, SanskritFritz escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:02 AM, João Miguel via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > A 2017-04-04T10:08:42 +0200, Guus Snijders via arch-general escreveu:
> > > (...)
> > >
> &
A 2017-04-04T10:08:42 +0200, Guus Snijders via arch-general escreveu:
> (...)
>
> I think Ely Swartz gave the best option;
> Use a custom repo for the non-standard pkg's and give it priority.
>
> Mvg, Guus Snijders
I agree, and the best part is that one can make it public so that the
everyone el
A 2017-04-03T08:25:16 +1000, Allan McRae escreveu:
> On 03/04/17 08:17, João Miguel via arch-general wrote:
> >>> I found this old bug report (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31594)
> >>> regarding this, but there's no decision about it.
> > Note: if this i
A 2017-04-01T18:13:59 +0200, Guus Snijders escreveu:
> Op 1 apr. 2017 17:14 schreef "João Miguel via arch-general" <
> arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have some unofficial repos added in pacman.conf, and at times use ABS
> and the AUR, so I often
A 2017-04-02T02:02:30 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general escreveu:
> On 04/01/2017 11:14 AM, João Miguel via arch-general wrote:
> > First of all, why is this a warning? What is the problem of me having a
> > newer version of a package than the repository? --quiet does not help.
Hello,
I have some unofficial repos added in pacman.conf, and at times use ABS
and the AUR, so I often get messages like this:
# LANG=C pacman -Syu
...
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: udevil: local (0.4.4-2) is newer than community (0.4.4-1)
...(10 messages from unofficial repos)...
A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
>
> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
>
> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
> upstream developer) and an "xrev" that's bumped w
> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just
> concerned there are many outdated packages as of late, and what makes
> Arch so special to many people is the rolling release part and up to
> date packages.
It seems legitimate to expect the package to be up-to-date given it may
be
> The drawer/system/pacman is indeed in my /etc/asd.conf. This is then
> not an error and has nothing to do with choosing a non default folder
> to contain my pacman packages.
Aah, so the «abd» was *not* a typo for «ABS» nor «and», it was «asd».
See I would've never guessed that, in the future you
A 2016-08-17T19:17:43 +0300, Alex Theotokatos via arch-general escreveu:
> On 08/17/2016 02:32 PM, arnaud gaboury via arch-general wrote:
> > > From /etc/pacman.conf:
> >
> > CacheDir= /drawer/system/pacman/cache/pacman/pkg/
> Where did you found this line?
Ahm... (see below)
> It should be
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
