On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:38:01 +0200, JM wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The current installer images are from 05.2010 which is over a year
>> old. I was unable to install Arch on my new laptop using this
>> insta
Hello,
The current installer images are from 05.2010 which is over a year
old. I was unable to install Arch on my new laptop using this
installer due to insufficient hardware support in kernel 2.6.33. Are
there any plans to update it?
Regards,
JM
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 09:35 PM, JM wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> JM wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have browsed through all High and Me
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> JM wrote:
>> I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and
>> categorized some of them here:
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam .
>>
>> 'Candidates for cl
hrough, so
perhaps some other user wants to pick up where I left :)
Cheers,
JM
ther?
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
JM
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> $ pactree network-manager-applet | grep gnome
> |--libgnome-keyring
> |--gnome-keyring
> |--polkit-gnome
>
> That's "half" of Gnome?
I stand corrected. However, it used to pull in libgnomeui and company
through one of its dependencies
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> Use networkmanager + nm-applet instead.
IIRC nm-applet pulls in half of Gnome and networkmanager does not have
a desktop-agnostic graphical frontend. Alternatively you could try
wifi-radar. Also, if you believe your hardware is poorly supporte
iased AUR packages and bugging
Arch devs about sudden additions of dependencies. But I feel I am
losing. We are destined to live in a convoluted mass of redundant
dependencies.
Regards,
JM
prepare PKGBUILDS and
patches (borrowing bits from Gentoo) for both libraries, I failed at
musepack-tools. It's been over two hours and I am tired and hungry.
Please find the relevant files attached and not mock me too much.
Regards,
JM
[1] http://www.musepack.net/index.php?pg=src
PKG
libraries (libcuefile and libreplaygain) which are
obtainable only through musepack's svn. Is this the reason why there
is only the previous version in the repos?
Regards,
JM
-ARCH/kernel/fs/isofs/isofs.ko): Invalid module
format
How should I go about reverting /lib/modules to the default state?
Thanks for your support.
JM
odule
format
Regards,
JM
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> Does this happen with only one or a few DVDs or with every DVD?
>
It happens only with DVDs written as iso9660. UDF DVD mount just fine.
I have tried both mount -t auto and mount -t iso9660, it did not make
a difference.
Regards,
JM
I checked grub's menu.lst file, reinstalled the kernel with pacman -S
kernel26 and rebooted, just to be sure. Still the same error message.
Thanks for suggestions.
JM
l/fs/isofs/isofs.ko): Invalid module
format
This is an up-to-date non-testing system. Help would be appreciated.
Regards,
JM
ed in the
wiki and no one at #archlinux could explain to me what it does. Seems
to work, though.
Hope it helps,
JM
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> JM wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some
>> time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced
>> forcing many users, includi
arch-dev-public if some other dev would be
interested in maintaining the package.
Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned
to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so,
what compatible alternatives are there?
Kind regards,
JM
[1] http
Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
> Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
> 510 Ochiltree Street
> Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
> Telephone: (936) 715-9333
> Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
> www.rankinlawfirm.com
>
SVG is usually big enough ;) You can find it in the archlinux-artwork package.
Regards,
JM
sam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 02:28 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:24 +0300
>>> Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:33 +0200, JM wrote:
>>> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 200
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:17 +0200, JM wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I notic
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:48 +0200, JM wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really
>> necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications
>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
>
> JM wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really
> > necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications
> > such
Hello,
I noticed that libsoup in [testing] depends on gconf, is that really
necessary? Libsoup is a dependency for some desktop-agnostic applications
such as Midori (through its dependency on libwebkit) or hardinfo (currently
in AUR).
Regards,
JM
25 matches
Mail list logo
