Re: [arch-general] opinion request about Firefox add-ons

2016-01-31 Thread Attila
rl :) ). > However, I'm not talking about the Google search engine, but about > "safe browsing" and other Google features used by Firefox. If you want to spend some time with reading: http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/18/a-comprehensive-list-of-firefox-privacy-and-security-settings/ See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shutdown and reboot not working after last weekend update

2012-06-12 Thread Attila Vangel
sudoers (edited by visudo (you can change the editor of it, just google it)), so that these commands can be executed without entering the password all the time... Maybe not the best thing still, but I guess it's OK with me. Regards, Attila 2012/6/12 Victor Silva : > Folks after the last

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

2011-04-07 Thread Attila
hereas fcron has fcrontab with a slightly different syntax. > We could actually make cronie replace dcron. I agree with this instead i'm a fcron user. But because it is say so much often, is there really anyone who have something in /etc/cron.d? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

2011-04-06 Thread Attila
--with-selinux=yes|no Use (or not) SELinux (default: yes). Okay, now only the size and the "/etc/cron.d" support is on the list. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Dropping Oracle OpenOffice

2011-03-09 Thread Attila
edless_sh**_for_non_latex_users_bought_from_the_dark Sorry your your assist was too good :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] knotify4 is eating 90%+ of the CPU in gnome - can it be reniced or something?

2011-03-02 Thread Attila
apps writes their information over this interface and this could be more the reason that it starts. But on the other side if i see your cpu load than deactivating could be even better.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kde4 loads kde3 parts -- is this a packaging issue?

2011-02-26 Thread Attila
mp and in /var/tmp. But starting with runlevel 3 and delete all kde things in both directories could never be wrong. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread Attila
stead of qcow. But the handling with virtualbox is easier so David see this only as an information and not as an suggestion. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

2011-02-17 Thread Attila
y drive a pinto if you can drive > a jag? Okay, i'm not a dev, but mailx-heirloom provides mailx "provides=('mailx')" and therefore all shoould be fine. I myself ask me more why there is not conflicts array in the PKGBUILD of mailx-heirloom. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment

2011-01-20 Thread Attila
int and i move ata_id to another place. I think the biggest problem for writing a bugreport is that this happens very, very seldom. See you, Attila

[arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment

2011-01-19 Thread Attila
this because it is very seldom and therefore very hard to find out what is the problem. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] When will Arch switch to Upstart

2011-01-19 Thread Attila
d before work (or a business date) to have the answer(s) if he is back than 12h be not very long.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-07 Thread Attila
At Samstag, 8. Januar 2011 01:17 Karol Babioch wrote: > You shouldn't let this any gamer hear, although most of them are > properly using windows for that ;). I don't think that using UDF with DVD-RAM is only important for gamer.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Testing kills shm and pts

2010-12-13 Thread Attila
0 0 tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,rw,mode=1777 0 0 All my favorite browser (opera, firefox and chromium) have their cache inside of /tmp but i don't use a script for copying the profile. Good luck, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nilfs-utils moving in core

2010-12-07 Thread Attila
t it instead of the very good reports about it be very attractice. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [extra] repository cleanup

2010-11-14 Thread Attila
.org/wsvn/community/?op=rss&isdir=1 Thanks a lot. I don't know about number 2 and 3 but this informations be very helpfull ( and more than i want but i said 'without too much extra cost' :) ). See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [extra] repository cleanup

2010-11-14 Thread Attila
0 appXYZ -> OLD REPO: EXTRA NEW REPO: NULL 2010-11-12 libXYZ -> OLD REPO: COMMUNITY NEW REPO: EXTRA Is there any change that this could realize without too much extra cost? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Opencl/Cuda headers

2010-11-12 Thread Attila
olved, NVIDIA's OpenGL header files can still be chosen, through this installer option. And i can't find (vdpau.h and vdpau_x11.h) or (cuda.h, cudaGL.h, cudaVDPAU.h, cl.h, cl_gl.h, cl_platform.h) if i extract the NVIDIA installer. I think your plan is so good as before and the README be right. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

2010-11-11 Thread Attila
arch linux ... which is not normal because some distributions ships only one cron and only this one could discuss about replacing. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

2010-11-11 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 20:16 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > So, not a mail since a while. Can we replace dcron now? :) What i don't understand is this "replace" here because fcron (or incron) is only one "pacman -S" away. And i say this as an fcron user. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] New nvidia driver - video mode not recognized - remove vga= from kernel line?

2010-10-29 Thread Attila
ow again. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] New nvidia driver - video mode not recognized - remove vga= from kernel line?

2010-10-28 Thread Attila
kernel line of your bootloader. I don't have nomodeset but "blacklist nouveau" in one of the files from /etc/modprobe.d. This works too. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Screen goes black after installing latest nvidia driver

2010-10-25 Thread Attila
h function of the nv forum i even have to search my glasses.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Screen goes black after installing latest nvidia driver

2010-10-25 Thread Attila
er sounds too easy for me. Perhaps it would be better if people with this problem compare their configurations. > take a look yourself: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14 And where is one of this reports? Sorry, but posting no url would be better in this case.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-08 Thread Attila
t /usr/local/bin/scan_deleted_files.sh #!/bin/sh # list of deleted files echo 'COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFFNODE NAME' lsof -n | grep ' DEL ' See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-08 Thread Attila
0 /SYSV The way of an rpm based system with using RPMDELETE as the flag seems easier to find out such files. Is there a analog way possible for pacman? I never take a look after an update with pacman. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-07 Thread Attila
before zypper get this feature. But RPMDELETE won't be there under archlinux. > I'm pretty sure that this could be much optimized, but i hope the idea > is clear If you find something for this this would be very, very nice.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
nfig files because opensuse, and every other rpm basesd distribution, do the same as archlinux with *.rpmsave and *.rpmnew files. As i said in the other posting, i don't think that any packager on this planet do mistakes with intent but they be even possible because we are all only humans. -) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
ce, that you will get a lot of more stories about updates in archlinux which runs without a problem instead the list of packages was enormous. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
but not a thing what is absolutely necessary or that it is unacceptable that we users do this by ourselves. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
d): The question is even how much is the effort to realize such a "luxury" solution and is it this worth. That is why i never wrote a feature request instead i think this idea is very nice.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
e nothing more than my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
ater :p If the count of updates is your problem than this idea could be something for you: # cat /etc/cron.daily/pacman.updates #!/bin/sh { /usr/bin/pacman -Sy echo /usr/bin/pacman -Sup } | /usr/bin/mail -s "$(hostname -s): Arch Updates" YourUser No question, this is more simple than perfect. -) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
fore one of the arch devs could misunderstood my lines: I can live perfectly that we the users do this by ourselves instead that the packaging comsumes more and more time. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-26 Thread Attila
At Samstag, 26. Juni 2010 07:38 Ray Rashif wrote: > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pacman-...@archlinux.org/msg03794.html Thanks for this information. It seems that at no point it was thought about a config variable and therefore we have to live with it. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-25 Thread Attila
file. See yoou, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-24 Thread Attila
tar.xz 2>&1 | tee -a $LOGFILE rm -v *.pkg.tar.xz 2>&1 | tee -a $LOGFILE There is room to optimize it with test statements and so on.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-24 Thread Attila
an use rm. For me this link is now a good help (and memory) to run namcap which i forgot in the most cases and therefore i found my peace with it. But i can understand the wish for a config variable if some don't need this. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-23 Thread Attila
how turn off this behavior? I start using a shell script for running makepg. At the moment i have no better idea to delete it. But for running namcap right after makepkg this symlink is an advantage. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-23 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 07:26 Allan McRae wrote: >> Or do you mean that a "makepkg -c" will clean elder invalid symlinks? > > This one. Is there a way to delete not only elder symlinks and the destination too? Could be very nice but is not a must.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
and line? Than this symlink could be a bigger help because you get remembered that there is a older package in your repo. At the end i must say that this symlink is not a problem for me and there be advantages too so i can live with it. So please don't see my points as criticism. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
ee you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
uot;makepkg -c" too and the symlink is still there. And i never install my own packages with "pacman -U" because i have my own repo on the server. Therefore i use "pacman -S" because than i can install it from my other pc too. Or do you mean that a "makepkg -c" will clean elder invalid symlinks? See you, Attila

[arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
ipman purge) PKGDEST=/server/work/archlinux/repo PACKAGER="Attila " PKGEXT='.pkg.tar.gz' [/server/work is a cifs mount point] Have i overseen something in the makepkg.conf to control this or does no one have this problem ... or is this a new feature which have to be so? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] mpfr-3.0.0-1, gcc-4.5.0-6 and libmpc-0.8.2-2

2010-06-12 Thread Attila
e 4.5 in a gcc-next package and make the step with the other distros. But this be only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Cannot install shaman from AUR

2010-06-06 Thread Attila
re or after the support for splitted packages in pacman? At example for this a GUI would be even better: pacman -Ss kdeplasma-addons -) If there is a chance that shaman get stable enough to step to extra this would be very nice but it is not a problem if not. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev 157-1, initscripts 2010.06-1, mkinitcpio 0.6.5-1

2010-06-03 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2010 23:59 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Actually, network rules are an exception, they still work. The removal > of NAME= only applies to /dev nodes. Thanks for this information and this sounds better for me as my first understanding of it. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev 157-1, initscripts 2010.06-1, mkinitcpio 0.6.5-1

2010-06-03 Thread Attila
" with a Symlink KERNEL=="eth*", ATTR{address}=="MAC", SYMLINK="lan" and would this works in the rc.conf? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] This is the "arch"-general list - Was Burning From Command Line

2010-05-27 Thread Attila
replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed > alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one. +100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Burning From Command Line

2010-05-26 Thread Attila
the world need cdrkit. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-03 Thread Attila
s/mozilla/openSUSE_11.2/src This is only an information and not a feature request.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-03 Thread Attila
estion what you and Allan said is not a productive way. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-02 Thread Attila
icial-branding" in their specfile and use system libs with a shared xulrunner too. So from my view you can ask them but i'm not an expert of it because i use my own package (kde integration). Perhaps this is more a problem for Debian than for archlinux. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Open Konsole Here ???

2010-03-19 Thread Attila
If you use the konqueror as filemanger instead of dolphn than you can choose the shortcut by yourself. if you want another terminal than you can do this in the systemsettings under standard components. Have fun with it, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-19 Thread Attila
At Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 12:01 Heiko Baums wrote: > Right, that's what NoUpgrade in pacman.conf does. ;-) Thanks for the smiley at the end because i was very silly (oder anderes gesagt die Leitung auf der ich stand ging mindestens zweimal um die Erde -) ). See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-18 Thread Attila
e use 'usr/lib/*' than the lib of every new or updated package will get installed with the '.pacnew' ending? Than there is no risk that is true and i'm wrong. Sorry for thinking too much complicated in this case. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-18 Thread Attila
nger time because no one is thinking that it was "simple mistake". That is all what i want to say and myself wouldn't have a problem with it. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-17 Thread Attila
t because sometimes i don't know weeks or months later what i have done ... but this be more my self-critical 2c.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-02 Thread Attila
and one stable). I said only my opinion about this wish to have multiple kernel versions. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-02 Thread Attila
cky > with the pacman -U option. We both are not so much different in our opinions (perhaps we should try it in german -) ) but instead of you i don't see the cache on my local disk as a backup. That is why i use own kernel packages to be on the safe side.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-01 Thread Attila
quest. On the other side i think it is even worth to have an own kernel package and the PKGBUILD of kernel26 makes it very easy to do this. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-29 Thread Attila
d can read any > local file. Thanks for the warning that is unsafe but how longer we discuss about doing the same with capabilities how more i like to stay with the gold old solution.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-29 Thread Attila
s support this) > so one has to use install scripts to adjust the permissions after install. I must say that using install scripts is from my view for permissions or setcap even the better way because than i don't need to be root to create a package. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-29 Thread Attila
have to look every time at the manpage of capabilities.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 20:38 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > I did nothing about group, only root perms ;) Keep the group ;) Ah okay that is the difference. But is this really necessary because this way sounds like "i have to know things what i never wants to know".-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
. > proc_lock_memory Lock into memory = cap_ipc_lock > proc_priocntl Increase priority Nothing found. > net_privaddrAllow ports < 1024, needed for RSCSI cap_net_bind_service Is it really such a problem to stay with "chmod 4710"? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
wio,cap_sys_resource+ep /usr/bin/cdrecord If i do this than i cannot open '/dev/sg1' and therefore i will stay with my way instead it is obsolete. Thanks for the hint, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
/usr/bin/readcd \ /usr/bin/cdda2wav; do /bin/chown -v root:optical $n && /bin/chmod -v 4710 $n; done /bin/echo "done. Than the user has only to be in the group optical. It works but perhaps a expert should say if this is okay. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
y to decide. Until than i do the same as everyone and use my personal favorite. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
ortunity to thank you for cdrtools which i use now under linux and in the past under OS/2. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
ides hire a laywer and see what happens in reality inf front of a court instead of voting. This would be better for everybody of us than this kind of confrontation. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] KDE 4.3 no power functions ?

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
hoose the same font with 1pt lower for gtk apps. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-24 Thread Attila
t; big file support. This makes proper blu-ray creation hard. My upstream > bug report on their mailing list was completely ignored, for example [1]. This is another reason to stay with the original. Thanks for this information. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] building x86_64 packages under qemu?

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 01:43 Damjan Georgievski wrote: > he is not using kvm (and kvm will not make a virtual 64bit cpu on a 32bit guest) Thanks for this hint. I thought he is using kvm because the binary has the same name. This was a mistake of mine. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] building x86_64 packages under qemu?

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
tio in your vm? http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Boot_from_virtio_block_device If you use disklabels in your vm (menu.lst, fstab) than you have only to change your start script. This helps a lot but sure it can't replace fast hardware. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
At Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 06:27 Loui Chang wrote: > I also find mutt's 'T' helps. It hides the quoted text. Very nice feature. Does anyone knows if this is possible in knode too? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Attila
sting too. Good Luck Steve and perhaps it would be a good idea to use an own kernel package for 2.6.31.x to have this as fallback and therefore better possibilies to find out why 2.6.32 don't works for you. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-23 Thread Attila
t; We will try to fix all known issues in testing before we move stuff to > core/extra. I believe that you and the other arch devs will gives all. Thanks for this work. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Attila
ackages for yourself. Second is that this discussions about what is the arch way here in public get a religious touch instead of what it has to be: First the arch devs should decides (and discuss) this and second the pragmatical way is even better than the academical way. Just only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 10:51 Raghavendra Prabhu wrote: > Qt 4.6 works fine for me And you you have a vertical LCD? But no problem if not because this sounds nice and i hope it will give KDE some speedup. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
bit bigger (Y) and a big more condensed (X). I must say that the new version for the fonts looks better for me but this be only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-01 Thread Attila
nitors: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=67031 I hope this will not be the same story.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pam settings INSECURE

2009-11-18 Thread Attila
authok nullok /etc/pam.d/common-session: session requiredpam_limits.so session requiredpam_unix2.so session optionalpam_umask.so Perhaps it could be a good idea to compare what other distributions do and optimize the files from archlinux. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kde4 tip - quicklaunch in your panel -- convenience at your fingertips!

2009-11-11 Thread Attila
or? Without konqueror and without kde3 perhaps dolphin could be good file manager but in comparison to it for me never.-) Just for the stats (and to say some positive thing too): Now at the moment the Perfomance of KDE4 is realy good. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-11-01 Thread Franczen Attila
2009/11/1 Trav : > Sent nomination for both muhammad.a.qa...@gmail.com and francz...@gmail.com! Thank you, I really appreciate it. Attila

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-11-01 Thread Franczen Attila
2009/11/1 Celti : > I would love an invite, if someone has one to spare. Me too. I've been wanting to play with this ever since I saw the intro video about it. So if anyone has a spare invitation, please drop it to francz...@gmail.com Thanks in advance, Attila

Re: [arch-general] We have lost the desktop war. The reason? Windows 7.

2009-10-26 Thread Attila
now i know that the other one have execellent solutions too. Instead i'm not lucky about this days of testing other guis i must repeat the biggest advantage: the choice. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] DE

2009-09-10 Thread Attila
eat and i'm missing only little things. The wiki from archlinux says the most to get it run and it is absolute painless to give it a try. There is a blog (http://blog.lxde.org/) which has nice informations about it too. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Maximum JFS file (not filesytem) size

2009-09-08 Thread Attila
o give star a try: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27135 See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] proportion between qoutes and lines

2009-09-07 Thread Attila
suggestion from mine. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Attila
u need to use nv fi But i think this will only works if you start kdm from the inittab ... or better to say, i don't know if this will works in the other case. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Howto adjust font scaling in Arch? All fonts look a bit big and fat?

2009-08-24 Thread Attila
hts? Compare the content of /etc/fonts/conf.d incl. the file ~/.fonts.conf. Perhaps this gives you the answer but it is possible too that opensuse use another (and/or other patched) version of fontconfig. Good luck, Attila

Re: [arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-13 Thread Attila
the bugreport this is a fantastic solution. > I would not recommend the general use of that Me too ... but for own packages with own risk it is enough.-) Thanks again, Attila

Re: [arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-12 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 12. August 2009 09:52 Allan McRae wrote: > No, that will not work. Perhaps in the future? If not, no problem and i don't want to force you to say me a release date.-) See you, Attila

[arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-12 Thread Attila
ides array with the full names if this is necessary. Comment: Thanks for the pacman support of splitting PKGBUILDs. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] GNOME 2.28 - changes ahead

2009-08-11 Thread Attila
nstruction at the moment? For 'oss' i get a exception on if i click on "svn entries". See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread Attila
t them than this could be a very hard work. So from my view using the libjpeg6 from aur would be the best compromise. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread Attila
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runlevel See you, Attila P.S.: Do you like your keyboard or why do you don't use '1' instead of 'single'.-)

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-18 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 19:27 Florian Pritz wrote: > Get the old libjpeg package, extract it and copy the .so file to > /usr/lib. Linking is a no-go. The best solution for working around seems this package from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28427 See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
t i have enough to do compiling my kde3 packages with the news gcc ... perhaps this is the reason why searching the web for patches is not my first option.-) See you, Attila

  1   2   3   >