On 22.08.2012 08:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi :)
the host is an Arch Linux 64bit install. I run Windows XP 32bit as
guest, getting a very good, fast performance.
I installed Fedora 17 64bit as guest and the performance is slow, the
mouse cursor is moving in slow motion. Is there anything I can d
Hi :)
the host is an Arch Linux 64bit install. I run Windows XP 32bit as
guest, getting a very good, fast performance.
I installed Fedora 17 64bit as guest and the performance is slow, the
mouse cursor is moving in slow motion. Is there anything I can do to get
a better performance?
Regards,
Ra
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 01:06 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > On 17 Aug 2012 06:42, "Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia" <
> > archli...@ishpeck.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:29:26PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> >> > Just recei
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
>> has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
>> considers it an
>> abomina
2012/8/22 Felipe Contreras :
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> no flexibility is lost by moving to systemd, and really, much more
>> gained: wider userbase, wider testbase, simple units to write, simple
>> units to read, loosely coupled ordering, implicit dependenc
On 08/22/12 at 02:06am, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Ferrando
> wrote:
>
> > And sysvinit didn't have those when it began? Come on.
>
> I don't know, I probably wasn't born yet, and probably there weren't
> even computers before. But supposing there was s
On 22/08/12 at 04:23am, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 22.08.2012 02:48, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase
> >wrote:
> >>On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy
> >>>wrote:
> Could you give
On 22.08.2012 02:48, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy
wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to U
On 22/08/12 03:03, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> So if it works for you, it will surely work for *everybody* else. I
>> have seen this argument so many times that I'm starting to worry about
>> the rationality of Arch Linux users and
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> So if it works for you, it will surely work for *everybody* else. I
> have seen this argument so many times that I'm starting to worry about
> the rationality of Arch Linux users and developers.
>
> Yes, it's good to be on the bleeding edg
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing
>>> list
>>> has already stated his desire to final
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
>>> I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
>> Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
>> I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
>
> As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all t
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
>>> Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
>>> I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
>>
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all the problems
have been
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
>> has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
>> considers it an
>> abomina
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
>> Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
>> I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
>
> As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, John K Pate wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:16:31 +0200
>>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Denis
On 22.08.2012 01:56, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
considers it an
abomination.
Who is this membe
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
> Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
> I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all the problems
have been ironed out by slow small changes, so if som
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
> And sysvinit didn't have those when it began? Come on.
I don't know, I probably wasn't born yet, and probably there weren't
even computers before. But supposing there was something before, I'm
sure the people that made the transition d
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
> has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
> considers it an
> abomination.
Who is this member? It seems I joined late to the party.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> no flexibility is lost by moving to systemd, and really, much more
> gained: wider userbase, wider testbase, simple units to write, simple
> units to read, loosely coupled ordering, implicit dependencies, Grand
> Unified logging capabi
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
On Aug 21, 2012 4:40 PM, "Felipe Contreras"
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy
> wrote:
> > What alternative to systemd would you rather see?
>
> systemd is
On 22 August 2012 01:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
>> What alternative to systemd would you rather see?
>
> systemd is the alternative, the standard has been initscripts for
> decades. Now that distributions are switching to systemd they are
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
> What alternative to systemd would you rather see?
systemd is the alternative, the standard has been initscripts for
decades. Now that distributions are switching to systemd they are
starting to see boot problems that didn't exist before.
On 22 Aug 2012 07:22, "Felipe Contreras" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
> > with or without this poll, we are continuing with our plan.
>
> That's exactly what you should do, if your objective is to loose
> users; ignore them.
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:06:46AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Could those receiving these emails please speak out? I haven't, for one.
> > Not that much can be done about it..
>
> I have received about 30 of them, all from 74.63.112.146.
Someone loves you :-) I got only 3 :-(
Ciao,
--
What alternative to systemd would you rather see? It makes things much
easier for the developers and if you don't like it you can fork arch into
your own disro. Besides relocating a changing some config files, systemd is
not going to have a noticeable impact on more than a few users. It offers
mor
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> with or without this poll, we are continuing with our plan.
That's exactly what you should do, if your objective is to loose
users; ignore them.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2012 06:42, "Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia" <
> archli...@ishpeck.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:29:26PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> > Just received a second bogus 'unsubscribe confirmation request'.
>> >
>> > This b
yes, you were right :P
ug 21 16:46:19 localhost postfix/smtpd[12628]: connect from
oiujoidjwiodjwodij.net[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 16:47:16 localhost postfix/trivial-rewrite[12643]: warning: do not
list domain dimitrisze.com in BOTH mydestination and virtual_mailbox_domains
Aug 21 16:47:16 localhost
Le Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:39:27 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> O.o nothing!
>
> WTF?
Can you try to grep my "t...@test.com" in your logfile ?
O.o nothing!
WTF?
On Aug 22, 2012 12:12 AM, "Jean-Luc Bassereau" wrote:
> Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:17:28 +0300
> Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > inbox is empty... :(
> > should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
> >
>
>
> what does your logfile says about the email we sent ?
>
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:17:28 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> inbox is empty... :(
> should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
>
what does your logfile says about the email we sent ?
I've recently been testing systemd. One issue I encountered is with slapd,
the unit file ignores /etc/conf.d/slapd. Is this a bug, or am I supposed
to configure cmd line arguments (specially SLAPD_SERVICES) another way with
systemd?
Geert
--
geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :
inbox is empty... :(
should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau wrote:
> Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:37 +0300
> Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> nope :(
>> take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
>> Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
>> x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
>
On Aug 21, 2012 6:04 AM, "Christian Hesse" wrote:
>
> Paul Gideon Dann on Tue, 2012/08/21 11:01:
> > On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
> > >
> > > I am fine with the situation, I can deal with these thi
I use systemd. NM is running and I have a connection. I am a member of the
network group, but I don't have any group called networkmanager.
Its only that all the network manager tools (KDE applet, gnome applet,
nmcli) fail to communicate with networkmanager.
On 21 Aug 2012 19:23, "Martin Zecher"
On 20/08/12, David Hunter wrote:
| Or better yet, install systemd-sysvcompat and say goodbye to sysvinit
| completely.
Ah, very good - that worked a treat (nice to have a reboot command again
too).
Cheers.
--
Simon Perry (aka Pezz)
pgpgFn3qAgjnO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 21 August 2012 10:43, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
> pacman -Qo conflicting_file
This might be a better idea. You have to make sure that the file does
not belong to some other package. If it does, remove or upgrade the
other package as it should no longer belong to it, if it also belongs
to the p
On 21 August 2012 10:36, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> (4/4) checking for file conflicts
> [---] 100%
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> irqbalance: /usr/lib/systemd/system/irqbalance.service exists in filesystem
> Errors occurred, no packag
ti, 2012-08-21 kello 11:36 -0300, Martín Cigorraga kirjoitti:
> (4/4) checking for file conflicts
> [---] 100%
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> irqbalance: /usr/lib/systemd/system/irqbalance.service exists in filesystem
> Errors occurre
Since yesterday I'm receiving this error message when uprgading the
irqbalance systemd service, as this happened again some days ago when
upgrading dhcpd systemd service, I follow Tom G. advise and waited for
repos to update but this time there were more than 24hs, several mirror
changes and the pr
How is your box configured? (initscript or systemd, KDM, etc)
In which groups is your user? You shall be in network and networkmanager
groups.
Is networkmanager running? Does it connect?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> I'm facing the same problem, but the solution doesn't
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:37 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> nope :(
> take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
> Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
> x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
> Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]: connect from
> xxx-xx
nope :(
take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]: connect from
xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx.example.net[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]: SSL_accep
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:19:38 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> port 25 is now open and postfix listen to it
And is it working now ?
Does postfix receive email ?
port 25 is now open and postfix listen to it
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau wrote:
> Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:45:38 +0300
> Δημήτρης
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:45:38 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> well, I run smtps, so try:
> openssl s_client -connect dimitrisze.com:465
>
> as well ass IMAPS (port 993)
You need to have a MTA listening on port 25, if not, no one would be
able to send you email.
well, I run smtps, so try:
openssl s_client -connect dimitrisze.com:465
as well ass IMAPS (port 993)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau
On 08/21/2012 07:54 AM, Simon Perry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I've set up one of my VPS boxes with systemd after using it for a
> while on various laptops.
>
> I'm using netcfg@eth0.service to configure a static IP, however it seems
> that systemd insists on starting dhcpcd, and this screws up my
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:44:04 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I get no bounce...
> and no errors at all...
> here is my mail.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3pmRGEK5
>
Hello,
The MX set for your domain does not seem to answer :
# telnet mail.dimitrisze.com 25
Trying 15
Paul Gideon Dann on Tue, 2012/08/21 11:01:
> On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
> >
> > I am fine with the situation, I can deal with these things. Hopefully
> > others will read the wiki. :D
>
> For thos
On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
> Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
>
> I am fine with the situation, I can deal with these things. Hopefully others
> will read the wiki. :D
For those like me that followed the news article's instructions fi
I get no bounce...
and no errors at all...
here is my mail.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3pmRGEK5
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nicolás de la T
2012/8/21 Δημήτρης Ζέρβας <01tto...@gmail.com>:
> I've setup a mail server according to arch linux wiki post:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Simple_Virtual_User_Mail_System
> while everything works without any error, I can send email from roundcube
> but can't receive any.
> please tell me
Thomas Bächler on Tue, 2012/08/21 10:43:
> Am 21.08.2012 10:25, schrieb Christian Hesse:
> > pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
> >
> > and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
> > which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
> > Luckily I had an
Am 21.08.2012 10:25, schrieb Christian Hesse:
> pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
>
> and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
> which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
> Luckily I had an old curl package around to temporarily fix the proble
I've setup a mail server according to arch linux wiki post:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Simple_Virtual_User_Mail_System
while everything works without any error, I can send email from roundcube
but can't receive any.
please tell me what more info you need to help me figure out the problem
Hello everybody,
I just updated an old system and had to go through the lib -> usr/lib move. I
did an
pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
Luckily I had an old c
Seems I forgot to add the usb hook. It works now. Thank you for
replying and directing my attention towards mkinitcpio.
63 matches
Mail list logo
