Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Don Juan
On 01/16/2012 06:28 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: El 16/01/12 23:10, Karol Blazewicz escribió: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)) Errors occurred, no packages were

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
El 16/01/12 23:27, Karol Blazewicz escribió: meant that there was no sig checking for now. if this is correct why pacman is looking for signatures? btw, there is no 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll' option in my /etc/pacman.conf file, should I just add this line? Did you merge pacnew files? ok,

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
El 16/01/12 23:10, Karol Blazewicz escribió: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)) Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
> meant that there was no sig checking for now. if this is correct why pacman > is looking for signatures? > > btw, there is no 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll' option in my >  /etc/pacman.conf file, should I just add this line? Did you merge pacnew files?

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
El 16/01/12 23:10, Karol Blazewicz escribió: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)) Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote: > error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP > signature)) > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll'?

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
El 16/01/12 20:24, Mauro Santos escribió: On 16-01-2012 22:50, Uli Armbruster wrote: * Karol Blazewicz [16.01.2012 23:33]: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote: Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there y

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Mauro Santos
On 16-01-2012 22:50, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Karol Blazewicz [16.01.2012 23:33]: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos >> wrote: >>> On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote: Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there yet, but as pacman 4 br

Re: [arch-general] I can't upgrade to pacman4

2012-01-16 Thread 朱格宏
于 2012年01月17日 07:13, Thomas Dziedzic 写道: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: 2012/1/17 朱格宏: Hi,i found some problem when upgrade to pacman4 i use pacman -Syu and it told me :: package-query: require pacman<3.6 but my pacman is 3.5.4-4, how to slove it? Update package-quer

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:59:16 +0100 Giorgio Lando wrote: > On Mon 16/01/12, 23:50, Uli Armbruster wrote: > > And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden > > gimmick for us cool people ;) > > It is a secret which should not even be named in public Erm, it's on wikipedia

Re: [arch-general] I can't upgrade to pacman4

2012-01-16 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > 2012/1/17 朱格宏 : >> Hi,i found some problem when upgrade to pacman4 >> i use pacman -Syu and it told me >> :: package-query: require pacman<3.6 >> but my pacman is 3.5.4-4, >> how to slove it? > > Update package-query. > You get the error be

Re: [arch-general] I can't upgrade to pacman4

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
2012/1/17 朱格宏 : > Hi,i found some problem when upgrade to pacman4 > i use pacman -Syu and it told me > :: package-query: require pacman<3.6 > but my pacman is 3.5.4-4, > how to slove it? Update package-query. You get the error because you're about to install a new version of pacman, probable pacma

[arch-general] I can't upgrade to pacman4

2012-01-16 Thread 朱格宏
Hi,i found some problem when upgrade to pacman4 i use pacman -Syu and it told me :: package-query: require pacman<3.6 but my pacman is 3.5.4-4, how to slove it?

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Scott Lawrence
On 01/16/2012 05:59 PM, Giorgio Lando wrote: > It is a secret which should not even be named in public Too late. They know. They're coming. -- Scott Lawrence signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Giorgio Lando
On Mon 16/01/12, 23:50, Uli Armbruster wrote: > And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden > gimmick for us cool people ;) It is a secret which should not even be named in public

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Karol Blazewicz [16.01.2012 23:33]: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos > wrote: > > On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> > >> Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there > >> yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it w

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there >> yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was >> a good idea to move it. > > I was merging the

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Mauro Santos
On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there > yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was > a good idea to move it. I was merging the .pacnew files and some options that were on the "old" pacman.c

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > Did you test it re. "never-before seen errors" or did you look at the > .pacnew files? > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/pacman/ has a link "View > Changes", which points to a commit by dreisner: >  upgpkg: pacman 4.0.1

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 16.01.2012 22:12, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > Is it for real or is it an error? > > I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the > move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by > pacman throwing never-before seen errors. > Not that I mind Arch being

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:28:00 +0200 Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > Karol Blazewicz (2012-01-16 22:12): > > Is it for real or is it an error? > > > > I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the > > move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by > > pacman

Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Karol Blazewicz (2012-01-16 22:12): > Is it for real or is it an error? > > I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the > move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by > pacman throwing never-before seen errors. > Not that I mind Arch being a less han

[arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

2012-01-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Is it for real or is it an error? I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by pacman throwing never-before seen errors. Not that I mind Arch being a less hand-holding distro and actually requiring common s

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Don Juan
On 01/16/2012 08:07 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:28 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: On the other hard if you can get temperature readings in software level you can send them to a micro controller (Arduino?) which will control the fans accordingly. I think we are a bit offtopic

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:36 +, Peter Nikolic wrote: > Which is supposed to be disabled Did you reboot after blacklisting nvidia sound? Perhaps just unloading the module won't make hw:1 become hw:0.

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Peter Nikolic
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 17:14:30 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > Only thing you need to do is to set the HDMI and internal cards profiles to > disabled. > > On KDE: > 1 KDE system setting app > 2. Multimedia configuration panel > 3. Phonen sub menu > 4. 2nd tab (Sound HW) in the phonon settings screen >

[arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:21 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 15:55 +, Mauro Santos wrote: > > On 16-01-2012 15:14, Ralf Madorf wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > > > > > >> On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > >>> [snip]

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 15:55 +, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 16-01-2012 15:14, Ralf Madorf wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > > > >> On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >>> [snip] > >>> I've had to resort to attaching a resistor to the fans wire

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:28 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > On the other hard if you can get temperature readings in software > level you can send them to a micro controller (Arduino?) which will > control the fans accordingly. I think we are a bit offtopic > though :) . A micro controller needs

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Mauro Santos
On 16-01-2012 15:14, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > >> On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >>> [snip] >>> I've had to resort to attaching a resistor to the fans wire in the past. >>> [snip] >> >> Or connect it to a potentiometer and

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Thanasis Georgiou
On 16 January 2012 17:20, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:14 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > [snip] >> I thought that since we are away from Ataris, we don't need a fan >> control anymore, anyway: >> >> http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http://coolcircuit.com/circuit/fan_controller/auto

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Mauro Santos
On 16-01-2012 15:10, Peter Nikolic wrote: > On Monday 16 Jan 2012 11:02:00 Mauro Santos wrote: >> On 16-01-2012 08:52, Peter Nikolic wrote: >>> 1 : no audio from firefox on most sites or absolute full volume with no >>> control over it at all ie no sound from youtube but if i download >>> the

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:14 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > > > On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > [snip] > > > I've had to resort to attaching a resistor to the fans wire in the past. > > > [snip] > > > > Or connect

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
Only thing you need to do is to set the HDMI and internal cards profiles to disabled. On KDE: 1 KDE system setting app 2. Multimedia configuration panel 3. Phonen sub menu 4. 2nd tab (Sound HW) in the phonon settings screen 5. (Sound) card: [for both internal and NVIDIA HDMI] 6. Profile: Disabled

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Peter Nikolic
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 12:10:03 Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 11:36 +0200, Jesse Jaara wrote: > > Yous hould no't have n eeded to do that. Pulseaudio should only be > > needed > > by application whick don't do anything without pulseadio. We have > > libpulse package that provides pulsea

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > [snip] > > I've had to resort to attaching a resistor to the fans wire in the past. > > [snip] > > Or connect it to a potentiometer and have control of the speed. I thought that si

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Peter Nikolic
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 11:02:00 Mauro Santos wrote: > On 16-01-2012 08:52, Peter Nikolic wrote: > > 1 : no audio from firefox on most sites or absolute full volume with no > > control over it at all ie no sound from youtube but if i download > > the > > video it is ok or go to another site

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Thanasis Georgiou
On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > [snip] > I've had to resort to attaching a resistor to the fans wire in the past. > [snip] Or connect it to a potentiometer and have control of the speed. -- Thanasis Georgiou

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:21:32 -0800 Don Juan wrote: > Thanks for the time and effort in the response but nouveau is worse than > using nv for me. I will just live with the heat until I can go back to > nvidias blob It's *always* a dumb move to move fan control out of hardware and into software.

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 11:36 +0200, Jesse Jaara wrote: > Yous hould no't have n eeded to do that. Pulseaudio should only be needed > by application whick don't do anything without pulseadio. We have libpulse > package that provides pulseaudio lib for applications linked with PA support > like mplaye

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Mauro Santos
On 16-01-2012 08:52, Peter Nikolic wrote: > 1 : no audio from firefox on most sites or absolute full volume with no > control over it at all ie no sound from youtube but if i download the > video it is ok or go to another site try "quinton-mc.org.uk/vindex.html" > just a few car club

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Peter Nikolic
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 09:07:16 Michael Holmes wrote: > For #2, try blacklisting the snd-hda-codec-nvidia module. Hi I will try that out a bit later see what happens Cheers Pete . -- Powered by Kernel: 3.1.9-2-ARCH KDE Development Platform: 4.7.4 (4.7.4) 10:02:37 up 12:09, 6 users, loa

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Jesse Jaara
Yous hould no't have n eeded to do that. Pulseaudio should only be needed by application whick don't do anything without pulseadio. We have libpulse package that provides pulseaudio lib for applications linked with PA support like mplayer -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to hel

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:32 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 09:25 +, Michael Holmes wrote: > > On 16 Jan 2012 09:19, "Jesse Jaara" wrote: > > > > > No real idea about the 1st one... have you installed pulseadio-alsa > > > and alsa-plugins ?. I don't > > > know what is the st

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 09:25 +, Michael Holmes wrote: > On 16 Jan 2012 09:19, "Jesse Jaara" wrote: > > > No real idea about the 1st one... have you installed pulseadio-alsa > > and alsa-plugins ?. I don't > > know what is the state of flashplugin our repos, but it might need > > lib32-{libpuls

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Michael Holmes
On 16 Jan 2012 09:19, "Jesse Jaara" wrote: > No real idea about the 1st one... have you installed pulseadio-alsa > and alsa-plugins ?. I don't > know what is the state of flashplugin our repos, but it might need > lib32-{libpulse,alsa-libs} pkgs > to function propelly whith PA AFAIK flash is

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 08:52 +, Peter Nikolic wrote: > [snip] > 2: I have an Nvidia graphics card GT220 that has HDMI output on it (i dont > use it dont have anything to take HDMI in) but it keeps getting setup as the > primary audio system there is an on board sound card as well that is >

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Jesse Jaara
Alternative use pavucontrol or KDE sound setup windows HW tab to set the internal and HDMI cards mode into 'disabled' from '2.0 Stereo output, Stereo Input.' or what ever it is set for. This makes sure only the usb card is used, as its the only one PA apps see as usable then. No real idea about th

Re: [arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Michael Holmes
For #2, try blacklisting the snd-hda-codec-nvidia module.

[arch-general] Audio quirks

2012-01-16 Thread Peter Nikolic
Hi and morning Right then with a bit of help most things so far have been solved heres another one , Audio for the mst works well using PA apart from 2 glitches 1 : no audio from firefox on most sites or absolute full volume with no control over it at all ie no sound from youtu