[arch-general] A question regarding lxc

2011-03-31 Thread Piyush P Kurur
Can anyone please tell me whether my understanding of lxc is correct. Say I have lxc containers foo1, foo2 and bar1, bar2 such that (1) foo1 and foo2 have seperate file hiearchy and (2) bar1 and bar2 share /usr /bin/ (i.e. directories where executables and shared libraries are kept) via read

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > This is one of the best April fools day jobs I have ever seen, good job! indeed ... it had me going for a few minutes, that's for sure :-) the funny thing is i kinda liked the idea -- i didn't take it as arch/debian/gentoo/etc were dead

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Thomas S Hatch
This is one of the best April fools day jobs I have ever seen, good job!

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Kyle
http://www.gentoo.org has it now. It took time to compile, but it's there. Lol. ~Kyle

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Leandro Costa
They aren't, but they should. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto < denisfalqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa >>> wrote: it's just www.gentoo.org left !! >>> >>> They're still c

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Leandro Costa
It worth 0,99$ only if it comes with the new distro logo. lol On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa > wro

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa wrote: >>> it's just www.gentoo.org left !! >> >> They're still compiling > > Sir, you own me a new keyboard, for my old is no

[arch-general] Updating hylafax to 6.0.5 - strange error - need help? fchmod(int, __mode_t) throw ()’ throws different exceptions

2011-03-31 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, I was working with hylafax in ABS on the 6.0.4 to 6.0.5 upgrade and I ran into a strange error related to "throws different exceptions": 86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -c Dispatcher.c++ In file included from Sys.h:34:0, from Dispatcher.c++:27: /usr/include/sys/stat.h

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Mike Sampson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa wrote: >> it's just www.gentoo.org left !! > > They're still compiling > Too funny! Well done all who had a hand in this.

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Jason Ryan
On 31/03/11 at 10:44pm, Leandro Costa wrote: > it's just www.gentoo.org left !! > Cue joke about them compiling their media release... -- Jason Ryan http://jasonwryan.com/ pgp80uLmEMvAK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa wrote: >> it's just www.gentoo.org left !! > > They're still compiling Sir, you own me a new keyboard, for my old is now covered with spit!!! LOL -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q:

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Leandro Costa wrote: > it's just www.gentoo.org left !! They're still compiling

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Leandro Costa
it's just www.gentoo.org left !! On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:30:20 -0400 > schrieb William Holbrook : > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:28 PM, C Anthony Risinger > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Heiko Baums > > > wrote: > > >> Am

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:30:20 -0400 schrieb William Holbrook : > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:28 PM, C Anthony Risinger > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Heiko Baums > > wrote: > >> Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:09:36 -0500 > >> schrieb C Anthony Risinger : > >> > >>> so i sorta meandered to th

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread William Holbrook
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:28 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:09:36 -0500 >> schrieb C Anthony Risinger : >> >>> so i sorta meandered to the debian.org homepage randomly, and was >>> surprised to see this: >>> >>> [ it's

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:09:36 -0500 > schrieb C Anthony Risinger : > >> so i sorta meandered to the debian.org homepage randomly, and was >> surprised to see this: >> >> [ it's a link, go ahead and click it :-) ] >> http://www.debian.org/ > > Or

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Vincent Schumaker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:09 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> EDIT: ah jeez ... it's that damn time of year again.  haha i always >> forget about the day of fools until i'm 3 seconds from spamming my >> gullibility to the world. > > Thi

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:09:36 -0500 schrieb C Anthony Risinger : > so i sorta meandered to the debian.org homepage randomly, and was > surprised to see this: > > [ it's a link, go ahead and click it :-) ] > http://www.debian.org/ Or go to these links. :-) http://www.archlinux.org http://www.opens

Re: [arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread Vincent Schumaker
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:09 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > EDIT: ah jeez ... it's that damn time of year again. haha i always > forget about the day of fools until i'm 3 seconds from spamming my > gullibility to the world. > > sending anyway because i already wrote it ;-) > > C Anthony > >

[arch-general] "The Canterbury Distribution"

2011-03-31 Thread C Anthony Risinger
EDIT: ah jeez ... it's that damn time of year again. haha i always forget about the day of fools until i'm 3 seconds from spamming my gullibility to the world. sending anyway because i already wrote it ;-) C Anthony -- so i sorta meandered to

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-03-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - kernel image

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-03-31 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - kernel image

Re: [arch-general] pacman: downloading without "looking for inter-conflicts"?

2011-03-31 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:25:40AM -0700, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 00:52, Magnus Therning wrote: > > Is there some way of downloading upgradable packages without running > > the "looking for inter-conflicts" step? > > That would be the '-d' option, I believe. Indeed it

[arch-general] ArchLinux for mipsel (Loongson)

2011-03-31 Thread Heiher
Hello, Main page : http://dev.lemote.com:2001/ Docs : http://dev.lemote.com:2001/archlinux/other/docs/ -- Best regards! Heiher

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-03-31 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/31/2011 08:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel image is now xz compressed - NUMA is

Re: [arch-general] pacman: downloading without "looking for inter-conflicts"?

2011-03-31 Thread Patrick Burroughs
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 00:52, Magnus Therning wrote: > Is there some way of downloading upgradable packages without running > the "looking for inter-conflicts" step? That would be the '-d' option, I believe. ~celti

Re: [arch-general] pacman: downloading without "looking for inter-conflicts"?

2011-03-31 Thread jesse jaara
Update all, reboot and recompile

[arch-general] pacman: downloading without "looking for inter-conflicts"?

2011-03-31 Thread Magnus Therning
Is there some way of downloading upgradable packages without running the "looking for inter-conflicts" step? I have a locally modified broadcom-wl package[1], the modification is a dependency on the specific version of the kernel (in order to avoid the all too common situation where I updated the