Hi,
Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.
Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt
--
Regards
Shridhar
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:22:35 -0500
schrieb Robert Howard :
> What do other distros do on their bugtrackers? We should allow
> comments after closing to facilitate further user input. Lets not
> forget that Arch Linux would not be in it's current state without
> user/dev interaction.
I used Gentoo
On Saturday 13 March 2010 12:20:43 you wrote:
> Typo?
> your subject on the mail states you searched for gbd instead of gdb
> maybe?
>
> -T
>
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, richard terry wrote:
> > couldn't retreive the gnu debugger from pacman -S gdb, and looking in the
> > extra repo it didn't se
What do other distros do on their bugtrackers? We should allow comments
after closing to facilitate further user input. Lets not forget that Arch
Linux would not be in it's current state without user/dev interaction.
On Mar 12, 2010 7:19 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +100
Typo?
your subject on the mail states you searched for gbd instead of gdb
maybe?
-T
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, richard terry wrote:
> couldn't retreive the gnu debugger from pacman -S gdb, and looking in the
> extra repo it didn't seem to be present.
>
> any reason?
>
> Richard
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> I really do not see the need.
>
> If a bug is wrongly closed -> request a reopen.
> If you just want to confirm a bug has been fixed, there is no need...
> we already closed the bug report.
> If there is a "better" fix, reopen request or
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin :
> So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
> the bug? Isn't that polluting the bug report? What happened here is
> exactly what I'd expect - you contacted the developer.
No, this is related to the bug, because
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:38:36 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin :
> Not at all. It is statistics. For a long time before the bug
> wranglers, I personally had to deal with 75% of the Project Manager
> requests from flyspray. These were all reopen requests, and many of
> them arguing with the actual choic
On 13/03/10 09:55, richard terry wrote:
couldn't retreive the gnu debugger from pacman -S gdb, and looking in the
extra repo it didn't seem to be present.
any reason?
It is definitely there. "pacman -Syy" may help and if not change your
mirror and do it again.
Allan
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:55 PM, richard terry wrote:
> couldn't retreive the gnu debugger from pacman -S gdb, and looking in the
> extra repo it didn't seem to be present.
>
> any reason?
https://dev.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/gdb/
It's in extra. Perhaps your mirror is broken?
couldn't retreive the gnu debugger from pacman -S gdb, and looking in the
extra repo it didn't seem to be present.
any reason?
Richard
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Isaac Dupree
wrote:
> On 03/12/10 10:34, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
>> commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
>> developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed. That's
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> So closing a bug becomes 1) remove yourself from
> assignees, 2) remove from notification, 3) close bug.
This is what worries me the most. If comments on old bugs are allowed,
this will become the norm.
On 03/12/10 10:34, Aaron Griffin wrote:
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed. That's what
a reopen request is for. If that fails, then it's time to di
On 13/03/10 09:13, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 13/03/10 08:35, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
In my eyes, I imagine the kind of people who want this feature simply
wish to argue about the closing. I've had to deal w
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 13/03/10 08:35, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>
>> In my eyes, I imagine the kind of people who want this feature simply
>> wish to argue about the closing. I've had to deal with enough PM
>> requests in t
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 12.03.2010 20:35, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> Well it *is* one command from a git checkout
>>
>> cd install-iso
>> make
>
> Let's make that 2:
>
> # pacman -S archiso
> # archiso-build-cd --arch i686 --format iso
This is just too complex t
Am 12.03.2010 20:35, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> Well it *is* one command from a git checkout
>
> cd install-iso
> make
Let's make that 2:
# pacman -S archiso
# archiso-build-cd --arch i686 --format iso
or something like that :)
We have an archiso package from 2008 in extra. Any package is better
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
>> commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
>> developers
>
> assuming malicious users up-front?
Not at all. It is statistics. For a long time before
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
>
> Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
> Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
Well damn, looks like I was looking too high up.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
More-over, I think it is a bad
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:06:59PM +0100, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:27:25 -0600
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
> > Guy,
> >
> > I know nothing about python other than what it is. I need to
> > install repoview-0.6.5 on my arch server, but I'm not sure where.
> > Looking a
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
>
> Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
> Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
>
>> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people w
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:27:25 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guy,
>
> I know nothing about python other than what it is. I need to
> install repoview-0.6.5 on my arch server, but I'm not sure where.
> Looking at the other python apps like cairo, FusionIcon, etc.. thay
> seem to be install
> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
> commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
>
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 14:11 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> > On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> >> > But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> > But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
>> > a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
>>
>> Seriously, p
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
> > a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
>
> Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 09:34 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
>
> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
> commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
> developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be close
Big problemo.
Wanting to get access to my sons MS vpn server which needs MPPC, I found and
installed an MPPC patched kernel26, and MPPC patched ppp. No problems so far,
and both the LTS, and the MPPC patched kernels booted with no problems.
My Arch install hadn't been updated since 20090928, an
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 12.03.2010 16:37, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>>> Using the core installing then just upgrading kernel26 and
>>> kernel26-firmware to 2.6.33 worked just in case anyone was wondering.
>>> Got networking up finally :)
>>
>> Yeah, I was going to
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
> a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is
stupid. We're all grown ups, no one is going to have the
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:34:01 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin :
> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Commenting on closed bugs isn't necessary. This is a matter of taste.
Some bug trackers allow this, some not.
> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
> com
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
I didn't know it, thanks for the info! So I guess every argument
from now on is just for the sake of completion...
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting o
On 12.03.2010 16:48, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 12.03.2010 16:37, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>
>>> Using the core installing then just upgrading kernel26 and
>>> kernel26-firmware to 2.6.33 worked just in case anyone was wondering.
>>> Got networking up finally :)
>>>
>> Yeah, I was going to
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Gordon Campbell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for all your advice. So far I am enjoying my experience with Arch
> Linux since I changed my Distro over from Fedora about a month ago.
Just one more opinion, it can't hurt :)
I myself don't need a firewall beyond my route
Am 12.03.2010 16:37, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> Using the core installing then just upgrading kernel26 and
>> kernel26-firmware to 2.6.33 worked just in case anyone was wondering.
>> Got networking up finally :)
>
> Yeah, I was going to suggest just pulling the kernel updates onto a
> thumb drive o
Hi,
Thanks for all your advice. So far I am enjoying my experience with Arch
Linux since I changed my Distro over from Fedora about a month ago.
Gordy
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 13:19, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:57:46 -0600
>> Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
>>> wrote:
>>> > you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:58:12 -0600
> schrieb Aaron Griffin :
>
>> This sounds like throwing technology at a problem that basically boils
>> down to a communication issue.
>>
>> Without specific examples, this isn't going to go anywhere, really.
On 03/12/2010 05:22 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
If you run one of the fat desktops (KDE, Gnome) they will
have a GUI tool to configure iptables.
FYI - I've found firestarter to be a good, simple one for small home
network use.
DR
On 12 March 2010 13:19, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:57:46 -0600
> Dan McGee wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
>> wrote:
>> > you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
>> > in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) u
On Friday 12 March 2010 19:26:13 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:49:17 -
>
> schrieb "Gordon Campbell" :
> > I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is do
> > I need to install a firewall? if so which one?
ufw is a good iptables frontend. Pretty easy to se
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:49:17 -
schrieb "Gordon Campbell" :
> I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is do
> I need to install a firewall? if so which one?
>
> Thanks in advance,
Here's a good iptables tutorial with some good example firewall scripts:
http://www.froze
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:57:46 -0600
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
> > in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) uses pacman with that
> > config file, so it might just wor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
> in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) uses pacman with that
> config file, so it might just work, although i never tried it myself.
> if you are not afraid of
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:17:07 +
Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 12:14, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > you can also build your own iso's using archiso.
> > it's pretty easy, although you need archiso from git and you must
> > let it look in a repository that contains a 2.6.33 package (
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:49:36 +
Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 10:56, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > On 12 March 2010 10:54, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was just wondering if there are there any up to date
> >>> instructi
On 12 March 2010 10:56, Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 10:54, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>
>> On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
>>>
>>> I was just wondering if there are there any up to date instructions
>>> available for customising the arch installer? I only need to upgrade th
On 12 March 2010 10:54, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
>>
>> I was just wondering if there are there any up to date instructions
>> available for customising the arch installer? I only need to upgrade the
>> kernel to 2.6.32 in order to install (at least that
On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was just wondering if there are there any up to date instructions
available for customising the arch installer? I only need to upgrade the
kernel to 2.6.32 in order to install (at least that is the first problem I
have encountered).
Thanks in adv
I was just wondering if there are there any up to date instructions
available for customising the arch installer? I only need to upgrade the
kernel to 2.6.32 in order to install (at least that is the first problem I
have encountered).
Thanks in advance,
Damien
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:49:17AM -, Gordon Campbell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is
> do I need to install a firewall? if so which one?
In Linux the actual firewall is part of the kernel, you
just need to activate and configure it. Act
Am 12.03.2010 10:49, schrieb Gordon Campbell:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is do I
> need to install a firewall? if so which one?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gordy
You probably don't, but here is a link to some nice instructions for
setting one up
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Gordon Campbell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is do I need
> to install a firewall? if so which one?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gordy
For a home computer you don't need to have a firewall installed, since
you
Hi all,
I am new to this list and fairly new to Arch Linux. My Question is do I need
to install a firewall? if so which one?
Thanks in advance,
Gordy
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Manne Merak wrote:
> Is there a register or log that lists the history of package updates.
> I need to know what versions of encfs and openssl were updated and when.
> I am still unable to mount my 1.5 year old volume because of broken encfs
> and openssl update.
Is there a register or log that lists the history of package updates.
I need to know what versions of encfs and openssl were updated and when.
I am still unable to mount my 1.5 year old volume because of broken
encfs and openssl update.
(I did read all the bug reports associated with this, they r
Guys,
I need pdftk for a script I use that does fax processing. I ran into
this
problem 6-7 months ago, but still had another server with pdftk on it so it
wasn't critical. Now, I need to solve it.
Currently pdftk in AUR is out of date due to it a dependency of gcc-gcj
requiring
59 matches
Mail list logo
