Re: [arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread Allan McRae
David C. Rankin wrote: On 12/14/2009 04:16 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine. I can report that running 32-bit sudo on a 64-bit machine is fraught with problems :-) So, just

Re: [arch-general] kernel26 in [current] cries for love when new kernel version hits [testing]

2009-12-14 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
2009/12/15 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 14:25 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As far as I can remember i.e. quite far but also super blurry, as soon >> as a new kernel version hits [testing], the [current] version won't be >> updated anymore (it may have happened when _huge_ secu

Re: [arch-general] speaking of Thunderbird 3.X - great new thread summary view

2009-12-14 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 15/12/09 07:40, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Hmm, it just shows ... for me for all messages. top-left near the 'Subject' header, the button?/header with the icon that looks like a lower-case t, to the left of the star header - click it.

Re: [arch-general] speaking of Thunderbird 3.X - great new thread summary view

2009-12-14 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 01:21 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > If any of you had done as I did and abandon thunderbird in favor of > another > mua and haven't looked at thunderbird 3.0 yet, you are in for a real treat if > you view messages with threading. There is a new thread sum

Re: [arch-general] kernel26 in [current] cries for love when new kernel version hits [testing]

2009-12-14 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 14:25 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I can remember i.e. quite far but also super blurry, as soon > as a new kernel version hits [testing], the [current] version won't be > updated anymore (it may have happened when _huge_ security issues had > been discov

[arch-general] kernel26 in [current] cries for love when new kernel version hits [testing]

2009-12-14 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
Hi, As far as I can remember i.e. quite far but also super blurry, as soon as a new kernel version hits [testing], the [current] version won't be updated anymore (it may have happened when _huge_ security issues had been discovered). Today, we're stuck at .31.6 when .31.8 is out. Not a complain as

[arch-general] speaking of Thunderbird 3.X - great new thread summary view

2009-12-14 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, If any of you had done as I did and abandon thunderbird in favor of another mua and haven't looked at thunderbird 3.0 yet, you are in for a real treat if you view messages with threading. There is a new thread summary you are presented with when you select a collapsed thread that displa

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:47 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Sascha Blank wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) > > folgendes geschrieben: > > > >> Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > >>> 0.47 fails to build with a poppler error :/ > >> and more. i'd be

Re: [arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 12/14/2009 04:16 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine. I can report that running 32-bit sudo on a 64-bit machine is fraught with problems :-) So, just to work around my stupid

Re: [arch-general] New Thunderbird build 3.0-2 installs lightning by default

2009-12-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 12/15/2009 12:37 AM, Jürgen Hagemann wrote: The new TB update from today enables and installs lightning by default. Bugreport: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17510?project=1&pagenum=1 This is a bad idea, because some people don´t want it. Mozilla doesn´t recommend to set the calendar flag on b

[arch-general] New Thunderbird build 3.0-2 installs lightning by default

2009-12-14 Thread Jürgen Hagemann
The new TB update from today enables and installs lightning by default. Bugreport: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17510?project=1&pagenum=1 This is a bad idea, because some people don´t want it. Mozilla doesn´t recommend to set the calendar flag on building... Another point is, that the builtin cal

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Allan McRae
Sascha Blank wrote: Hello, Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) folgendes geschrieben: Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: 0.47 fails to build with a poppler error :/ and more. i'd be happy if someone can magically fix it. We're waiting for a compiling one too. A patch

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 15.12.2009 06:28, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:23 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > >> On 15.12.2009 06:19, Sascha Blank wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) >>> folgendes geschrieben: >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:23 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 15.12.2009 06:19, Sascha Blank wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) > > folgendes geschrieben: > > > > > >> Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > >> > >>> 0.47 fails to build wit

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 15.12.2009 06:19, Sascha Blank wrote: > Hello, > > Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) > folgendes geschrieben: > > >> Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: >> >>> 0.47 fails to build with a poppler error :/ >>> >> and more. i'd be happy if someone can magicall

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Sascha Blank
Hello, Arvid Picciani hat am Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009 um 23:13 Uhr (CET) folgendes geschrieben: > Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > > 0.47 fails to build with a poppler error :/ > > and more. i'd be happy if someone can magically fix it. We're waiting > for a compiling one too. A patch to make it

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Arvid Picciani
Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:01 +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote: Hi arch-general, I'd like to point your attention to the Inkscape package: Inkscape version 0.47 was released on November 25. This is a very significant release that many Inkscape users have been waiting patiently.

Re: [arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:01 +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote: > Hi arch-general, > > I'd like to point your attention to the Inkscape package: Inkscape > version 0.47 was released on November 25. This is a very significant > release that many Inkscape users have been waiting patiently. > > However, th

[arch-general] cpufrequtils dead or alive ?

2009-12-14 Thread Xavier
I just noticed a bump of cpufrequtils to 006-2 : http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/cpufrequtils/ What do you do with the bugs ? http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10959 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14083 Both are valid bugs, annoying, and trivial to fix ...

Re: [arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Xavier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> Magnus Therning wrote: >>> >>> This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist >>> and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine.  I can >>> report that runni

Re: [arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Magnus Therning wrote: >> >> This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist >> and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine.  I can >> report that running 32-bit sudo on a 64-bit machine is fraught with >> pr

Re: [arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread Allan McRae
Magnus Therning wrote: This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine. I can report that running 32-bit sudo on a 64-bit machine is fraught with problems :-) So, just to work around my stupidity I was wondering if i

[arch-general] I know of $repo, is there a $arch too?

2009-12-14 Thread Magnus Therning
This is the second time I'm being stupid when modifying my mirrorlist and I by accident put in a i686 repo on a 64-bit machine. I can report that running 32-bit sudo on a 64-bit machine is fraught with problems :-) So, just to work around my stupidity I was wondering if it is possible to put some

[arch-general] Inkscape maintainer MIA?

2009-12-14 Thread Marti Raudsepp
Hi arch-general, I'd like to point your attention to the Inkscape package: Inkscape version 0.47 was released on November 25. This is a very significant release that many Inkscape users have been waiting patiently. However, the Arch Linux Inkscape maintainer, Tobias Kieslich, seems to be missing