-bureaucratic reason to do so emerge.
P.S.: Edward, projects.kde.org now replaces now-defunct commitfilter, just log
in there, go to Amarok project and check "watch this project".
Matě
___
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde
standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)
_______
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
on irc.freenode.org
___
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
on IRC, but imho it is
time to ask ourselves weather this is a good approach. Imho it is not.
_______
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
.2) needed
> for some
> > cleanup changes, I only said "go forward" on IRC.
>
> (minor version) bump != minor (version bump)
>
> --
> Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
> dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
>
___
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
hchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
_______
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
been made,
instead of *the change has been made using bad process*.
Matěj
_______
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
Hades" Toroshchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
___________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
this can be always reverted, however I'd be
very unhappy to revert it just "because it wasn't discussed". The main
supporting argument was that latest release of every sane distribution
(including Debian testing) has it.
Matěj
_______
* Qt 4.8.2 (or newer)
+ http://qt-project.org
* TagLib 1.7 (or newer)
(Metadata tagging library)
--
1.8.1.5
___________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo