On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Edward Hades <edward.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sven Krohlas <s...@asbest-online.de> wrote: >> >> This project has a history of taking decisions on IRC, but imho it is >> time to ask ourselves weather this is a good approach. Imho it is not.
Please everybody, let's stop bitching at each other, there were mistakes made, but it is pointless to repeat it endlessly. So, since this is about the Qt dependency, let's discuss the obvious: It apparently makes sense to switch to Qt 4.8.2, as it - helps cleaning up old code - all distros, including Debian testing do provide it Are there technical reasons not to switch this dependency? If yes, please detail these. If not, please state that you agree with the switch The discussion is open now, if no obvious reason is given why we should not depend on Qt 4.8.2 in the next few days we will keep that dependency switch, else we will revert it. Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
