On 3. 4. 2013 Sven Krohlas wrote:
> fyi: deciding stuff on IRC has been the source for major arguments
> several times in the past. There are always people who had no chance
> to participate in the discussion. They are upset afterwards.
>
> This project has a history of taking decisions on IRC, bu
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Edward Hades wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sven Krohlas wrote:
>>
>> This project has a history of taking decisions on IRC, but imho it is
>> time to ask ourselves weather this is a good approach. Imho it is not.
Please everybody, let's stop bitching at
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sven Krohlas wrote:
> This project has a history of taking decisions on IRC, but imho it is
> time to ask ourselves weather this is a good approach. Imho it is not.
>
Definitely not.
--
Edward "Hades" Toroshchin,
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
___
Heya,
Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 2. 4. 2013 Edward Toroshchin wrote:
>> Well, I'm not a particular fan of bureaucracy myself, but why do we have
>> a mailing list at all, if such a major thing is not even _announced_
>> there?
>
> First, I wouldn't consider this _major_ at all. Second: yes, I should
Drop me from tha CC please. I don't have an opinion in what happens.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Edward Toroshchin wrote:
> Well, I'm not a particular fan of bureaucracy myself, but why do we have
> a mailing list at all, if such a major thing is not even _announced_
> there?
>
> Also, when
Don't heat this up with sophistics. Just don't forget to discuss major
changes before implementing them. Or if you think there's no one to
discuss them with, don't forget to notify whoever might be interested.
That's my point.
--
Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
__
On 2. 4. 2013 Edward Toroshchin wrote:
> Well, I'm not a particular fan of bureaucracy myself, but why do we have
> a mailing list at all, if such a major thing is not even _announced_
> there?
First, I wouldn't consider this _major_ at all. Second: yes, I should have
told Daniel to add CCMAIL: a
Well, I'm not a particular fan of bureaucracy myself, but why do we have
a mailing list at all, if such a major thing is not even _announced_
there?
Also, when did the discussion take place on the IRC? I'd love to see
that "sane distribution" list for future reference.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:
On 2. 4. 2013 Edward Toroshchin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I don't quite remember discussing the Qt version bump.
Given that this was only a minor version bump (4.8.0 -> 4.8.2) needed for some
cleanup changes, I only said "go forward" on IRC.
If there is a specific problem, this can be always reverted,
