Mailing lists matching lists.llvm.org
cfe-commits lists.llvm.orglldb-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-branch-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-bugs lists.llvm.org
[lldb-dev] [Bug 24813] New: TestBatchMode is not remote-ready
: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: lab...@google.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified The test fails for remote platforms as it does not know how to run processes remotely. -- You are
[lldb-dev] [Bug 24843] New: "ninja lldb-server" on OS X reports "error: unknown target 'lldb-server'"
intosh OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: todd.fi...@gmail.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -
Re: Add warning for c++ member variable shadowing
Hi Richard, Saleem I cleaned up the patch by removing some unrelated unit tests. Also Saleem can help me with the commit. Thanks! James From: James Sun Date: Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:35 PM To: Richard Smith Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool , "cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org" , Aar
Re: Add warning for c++ member variable shadowing
Hi Richard Thanks for the feedback! Hopefully addressed! Thanks James From: on behalf of Richard Smith Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 3:50 PM To: James Sun Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool , "cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org" , Aaron Ballman Subject: Re: Add warning for c++ membe
Re: r369999 - Don't lose the FoundDecl and template arguments for a DeclRefExpr in
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:48, Peter Collingbourne via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, it looks like this commit caused an assertion failure on the > following input: > > $ cat test2.ii > # 2 "" 3 > namespace a { > enum { b };
Re: [clang] 3b34d69 - Revert "For #64088: mark vtable as used if we might emit a reference to it."
Ping on this - please always include details on the reason for a revert. On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:09 AM Richard Smith via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This revert reintroduces a wrong-code bug, can you explain what the > purpose of the revert is? > > On F
Re: r284137 - [ThinLTO] Update doc to include lld (now supported).
Agreed. We should define them as aliases to existing options without -plugin-opt. On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sean Silva via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Nice to see this land! > > One nit: > Currently, doesn't LLD/ELF ignore -plugin-opt? T
Re: r285027 - Fix test on non-X86 platforms
4 Oct 2016 23:53, "Mehdi Amini via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The test is validating pointer size as well, so it is failing on 32 bits > right now. > > I could try to differentiate some of the check and have them work on both > size, but I ca
Re: r250514 - PS4: Make sure to add the sanitizer runtime before any linker input
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Artem Belevich via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Filipe, >> >> FYI, this change appears to introduce a somewhat subtle problem. clang >> compiled with itself starts producing (false positive?) warni
Re: r268797 - Fix sysroot-prefix.c on Windows (/ vs \).
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Yaron Keren via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Nico, > > In other tests, {{/|}} or {{/|\\}} are used match the forward or > backward slash(es). clang escapes \ so we get two of them in output and > four in the LIT
Re: [clang] c2f9086 - [Driver] Gnu.cpp: drop an unneeded special rule related to sysroot
Same error on the Android Chrome bots, although I didn't check if this commit was the issue. https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/ToTAndroid/16087/overview On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:11 AM Matt Morehouse via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Fan
Re: [cfe-users] Why doesn't clang use colors for diagnostics by default?
Try setting TERM to a color terminal, e.g., xterm-color or xterm-256color >> and see if that helps. I use xterm-256color inside tmux and it works >> fine. >> >> hth... >> don >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Victor via cfe-users < >> c
Re: [cfe-users] problem with `candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified argument'
ether it violates the standard or not is beyond my knowledge > though. > > type params > https://godbolt.org/z/WpET78 > > nontype params > https://godbolt.org/z/PZIaDn > > Jan > > > On Nov 5, 2018, at 4:36 PM, David Blaikie via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists
Re: [Lldb-commits] Support of MSVC function-level linking
mmits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On May 31, 2018, at 2:31 AM, Aleksandr Urakov via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm Aleksandr from JetBrains. We are working on improving support of > MSVC-compiled
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r319596 - Fix warnings in JSON.cpp, NFC
SONNumber::GetAsSigned() const > >case DataType::Double: > > return (int64_t)m_data.m_double; > >} > > - assert("Unhandled data type"); > > } > > > > double JSONNumber::GetAsDouble() const { > > @@ -82,7 +80,6 @@ double JSONN
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r327512 - [test] Disable TestMachCore everywhere except on Darwin
tried following through on that (so I don't know whether we'll run into some code including system headers or such...). On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 at 17:20, Greg Clayton via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What part is ifdef'ed? Mach core files should be available on
Re: [Lldb-commits] Patch for fixing FDE indexing when scan debug_info section
@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] Patch for fixing FDE indexing when scan debug_info section It looks ok to me. Please put the differences of .eh_frame and .debug_frame that you described below in code comments too. Thanks, Abid From: lldb-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r252124 - Fix build on Linux.
ame thing in other MacOSX platform files where they depend > on Apple specific libraries. > >> > >> > >>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Why are we trying to build
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D19215: normalize test file extension for test filenames
k I ever > knew, but if I did I've certainly forgotten it... Anyway, sounds like that > got turned back on again, and we should turn it off again... > > > > Jim > > > > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@list
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r246518 - Attempt at fixing the CMake build
ke/builds/5758>. I think the problem is relatively minor, but I lack the knowledge to fix it, so I have reverted these changes until you can investigate. pl On 1 September 2015 at 02:26, Enrico Granata via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2015, at 6:2
Re: [lldb-dev] Listening for thread events
What event_mask should be used for the thread event class? I did not find any. (Sorry for hijacking the thread) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It’s unclear to me why it would be a problem to listen to every thread > o
Re: [lldb-dev] How to link lldb on i386
> >> > As reported here: >> > >> > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27237 >> > >> > >> > (yes, I use shared libraries) >> > >> > Any workaround? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Sylvestre >> > PS: plea
Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution
t actually tested this or ever used this option in practice, just see that it's there and claims to be for this use case) On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:00 AM Sean Callanan via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > In fact, the lldbinline tests could be completely broken by > c
Re: [lldb-dev] Connecting to lldb-rpc-server
Why do you want to send commands to LLDB from a different process? > > We have a bunch of different extension points in LLDB, so it's possible > that what you're trying to do is actually already possible > > On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Rex Fenley via lldb-dev < > ll
Re: [lldb-dev] llvm changing line table info from DWARF 2 to DWARF 4
hat to > build lldb but uses it for the tests. That'll get us at least some testing > here. > > -eric > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:55 PM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I believe we are good, but it would be good to verify v
Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7
>> wrote: >> >> He said he did, so I don't know. Vadim, can you elaborate? When you run >> `lldb -P` from the command line, what do you see? >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:00 PM Reid Kleckner via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Re: [lldb-dev] Conditionally adding sources to the build
than one file > this way, then maybe a subfolder would make more sense though. > > pl > > On 1 December 2016 at 00:30, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Unfortunately you will need to separate them at the directory levels. >>
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [4.0.0 Release] Relase Candidate 1 has been tagged
gt; >>>> There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the >>>> testing started to see what issues come up. >>>> >>>> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how >>>> it goes. I'll upl
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
rect evolution of the "Apple" >>> accelerator tables that are implemented in LLVM (after going through the >>> standardization process and being reworked/generalized there), so we hope >>> that the implementation can at least share some common interfaces with the >
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
vm and use llvm::VersionTuple > > > I agree, though this move will cause merging issues for many that have > repositories that link against older llvm/clang. Doesn't affect me anymore, > but Apple will be affected. > > Greg > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM Greg Clayton
Re: [lldb-dev] Do we have any infrastructure for creating mini dump files from a loaded process or from a core file?
e & > cross-platform minidump writer, that's what I'd start with. > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Zach's right. On Windows, lldb can produce a minidump, but it just calls >&g
Re: [lldb-dev] Symbol Server for LLDB
As Adrian hints, there's an interest in adding first class support for >> symbol servers to LLDB. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:02 AM Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Not currently (at l
Re: [lldb-dev] Symbol Server for LLDB
ight >>> be relevant too. >>> >>> As Adrian hints, there's an interest in adding first class support for >>> symbol servers to LLDB. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:02 AM Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev < >
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] HTTP library in LLVM
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:38 PM Petr Hosek via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There are several options, I've looked at couple of them and the one I > like the most so far is https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib for a few > reasons: > > * It's MIT
Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Simplifying logging code
full code base within a reasonably short period of time to avoid confusion with the multiple log patterns. Tamas On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:00 PM Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > After the previous discussion I agree that evaluating the arguments is > unacce
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] 9f6a308 - [lldb/Utility] Fix a bug in stringify_append for printing addresses.
vidino Italiano wrote: > > > On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:37 PM, Shafik Yaghmour via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:04 PM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Autho
RE: r280057 - Combine two FileCheck patterns to prevent overzealous matching of .*
gt; From: cfe-commits > [mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org>] > On Behalf Of > Richard Smith via cfe-commits > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:15 PM > To: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [cfe-users] cfe-users Digest, Vol 102, Issue 1
gt; Send cfe-users mailing list submissions to > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D38938: Logging: provide a way to safely disable logging in a forked process
from exec in this regard). > > Tamas > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM Zachary Turner via lldb-commits > mailto:lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:15 PM Pavel Labath <mailto:lab...@google.com>> wrote: > On 15 October 2017
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of
Note that the test fails when using gcc as a compiler (specifically gcc-4.9 in this case, but hopefully the exact version does not matter here). Jason, will you be able to check this out today? On 29 September 2016 at 05:45, Dimitar Vlahovski via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure with VS 2015 Update 3
Jun 30, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I left out some words. I meant: > > The answers on that StackOverflow question claim that 32-bit MSVC never > does more than 32-byte alignment *for parameters*. > > On Thu, Jun 30, 20
Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB REFORMATTING IN PROGRESS
y patch changed the style outside the patch (diff: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D24331?vs=70653&id=70654). Am I doing something > wrong? > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Windows unit tests passing now.
Re: [lldb-dev] Setting shared library search paths and core files
;> >> With gdb, I'd do something like: >> >> set sysroot . >> file opt/my_cool_program >> core my_broken_coredump >> >> then everything would work. >> >> I've tried >> (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2
[PATCH] D121078: Replace links to archived mailing lists by links to Discourse forums
, feel free to email the `llvm-dev mailing -list <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_: it has lots +stuck or want to talk about it, feel free to open a thread in the `LLVM +forum <https://discourse.llvm.org>`_: it has lots of people who are interested in languages and are ofte
[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D121078: Replace links to archived mailing lists by links to Discourse forums
, feel free to email the `llvm-dev mailing -list <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_: it has lots +stuck or want to talk about it, feel free to open a thread in the `LLVM +forum <https://discourse.llvm.org>`_: it has lots of people who are interested in languages and are ofte
Re: r314079 - Fix implicit-fallthrough warning by adding missing break
Is there also missing test coverage here? On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 8:19 AM Simon Pilgrim via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rksimon > Date: Sun Sep 24 08:17:46 2017 > New Revision: 314079 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=314079&
Re: r338749 - Work around more GCC miscompiles exposed by r338464.
(+Hans) +1 On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 11:37, Martin Storsjö via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hans, > > I think this commit should be merged to the 7.0 release branch; the first > half of the GCC workaround made it in before the branch happened, but > there
Re: r305213 - Add regression test for r305179.
Prefer FileCheck over grep, generally? On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:05 AM Yaron Keren via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: yrnkrn > Date: Mon Jun 12 13:05:13 2017 > New Revision: 305213 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=305213&
Re: r351316 - Reapply [Tooling] Make clang-tool find libc++ dir on mac when running on a file without compilation database.
27;s fix r351360 or/and any subsequent 'more correct' test updates (if required) to get check-all on the branch into a passing state. -Greg On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 17:49, Jeremy Morse via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Platform REQUIRES added in r351360, please
Re: r359048 - C++ DR2387: a variable template declared wtih (or instantiated with) a
Thanks for the revert. Looks like this is probably an unfortunate interaction with the internal_linkage attribute. On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, 01:48 Ilya Biryukov via cfe-commits, < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Reverted in r359076. > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:28 AM Ilya Bi
Re: clang_getIncudedFile python binding fix
This patch looks good to me - great work! If you can upload it to https://reviews.llvm.org then I can review and merge it for you once it's approved. regards, Jon On 3 May 2018 at 08:55, József LÁZ via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I
[PATCH] D77056: [Sema][SVE] Allow non-member operators for SVE types
rsandifo-arm added a comment. I'd like to promote this from an RFC to an RFA. The associated cfe-dev discussion was: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-March/065060.html continuing into April here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-April/065069.html I don't t
Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM buildmaster is back to work now but two builders remain OFF
> Two slaves remain off for now as they produce a lot of warnings and their log files are way too big. I think https://reviews.llvm.org/D40603 will fix this issue. -Greg On 28 November 2017 at 22:13, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyo
Re: r320297 - Fix MSVC 'not all control paths return a value' warning
Thanks! On 10 December 2017 at 03:05, Simon Pilgrim via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rksimon > Date: Sun Dec 10 03:05:14 2017 > New Revision: 320297 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=320297&view=rev > Log: > Fix MSVC
Re: r308996 - [coroutines] Add serialization/deserialization of coroutines
On 31 July 2017 at 09:11, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Richard, Gor asked for this to be merged to 5.0. What do you think? Sounds good to me. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Gor Nishanov via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Author: gornish
Re: [clang] 4711512 - Fix oversight in AST traversal helper
Can you also include more detail in commit logs than this? It doesn't explain why this is an oversight, which makes code archaeology harder later. On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 3:32 PM Stephen Kelly via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Author: Stephen Kelly > Da
Re: Github build status reporting
a cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have configured buildbot to report build statuses to github. It is > running in a pilot mode. Only the following 4 builders annotate revisions > they build for now: > > * llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps
Re: [PATCH] D23926: [libcxx] Don't use C99 math ops in -std=c++03 mode
@Eric: Ping? On 1 Sep 2016 11:33, "Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 69962. > rmaprath added a comment. > > Simplified the patch a little bit more. > > Now, librar
Re: r280607 - PR 27200: Fix names of the atomic lock-free macros.
On 3 Sep 2016 6:01 p.m., "Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:56:43PM -0700, Richard Smith wrote: > /* 7.17.2 Initialization */ > > #define ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(value) (value) > #define atomic_init __c1
Re: Bug 23529: Add support for gcc's attribute abi_tag (needed for compatibility with gcc 5's libstdc++)
Would you mind sticking abi-tag.patch in phabricator: http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html ? Your patch is big enough that it would make it a little easier for me to review. On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Stefan Bühler via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all,
Re: r247882 - Appease clang/test/CodeGen/avx512dq-builtins.c for -Asserts, for now.
-Asserts was not culprit. On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:35 PM NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: chapuni > Date: Thu Sep 17 07:33:34 2015 > New Revision: 247882 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247882&view=rev &g
Re: [PATCH] D12903: Add -fplugin=name.so option to the driver
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > compnerd accepted this revision. > compnerd added a reviewer: compnerd. > compnerd added a comment. > This revision is now accepted and ready to land. > > Looks fine
Re: r248234 - ms Intrin.h: Fix __movsw's and __stosw's inline asm.
It says "error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'" I guess you disable a bunch of targets on that bot? On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.ll
Re: [PATCH] fix parentheses location in a CXXConstructExpr
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:23 PM Olivier Goffart via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the attached patch. > > In Sema::BuildCXXFunctionalCastExpr, if the class has a destructor, the > Op.SrcExpr might be a CXXBindTemporaryExpr
Re: [libcxx] r244462 - Protect template argument from user interference.
This is my mistake and I would like to see it merged. On Aug 10, 2015 2:13 PM, "Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:58:04PM -
Re: r277221 - Remove unused variable.
Hi Hans, Can you make sure this makes it into 3.9 please? Thanks! -eric On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:18 PM Eric Christopher via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: echristo > Date: Fri Jul 29 17:11:11 2016 > New Revision: 277221 > > URL: http://llvm.or
Re: [PATCH] D22834: Added 'inline' attribute to basic_string's destructor
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM Laxman Sole via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > laxmansole created this revision. > laxmansole added reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant. > laxmansole added subscribers: cfe-commits, sebpop, hiraditya, evandro, > flyingforyo
Re: [PATCH] D17434: [Clang-tidy] Make readability-container-size-empty working with STL string
should probably have test coverage On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Eugene Zelenko via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Eugene.Zelenko created this revision. > Eugene.Zelenko added reviewers: alexfh, xazax.hun, aaron.ballman. > Eugene.Zelenko added a subscrib
Re: [PATCH] D19831: [scan-build] fix dead store warnings emitted on clang code base
Any reason not to remove the story instead? On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Apelete Seketeli via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > apelete created this revision. > apelete added a reviewer: akyrtzi. > apelete added a subscriber: cfe-commits. > > This fixes d
Re: [PATCH] D19831: [scan-build] fix dead store warnings emitted on clang code base
Looks good to me - go ahead & commit whenever you're ready. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Apelete Seketeli via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > apelete updated this revision to Diff 55952. > apelete added a comment. > > [scan-build] fix dead stor
Re: [clang-tools-extra] r271295 - IncludeFixerTests: Update libdeps.
Thanks for the patch! On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:48 PM NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: chapuni > Date: Tue May 31 11:41:39 2016 > New Revision: 271295 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=271295&view=rev > Log:
Re: [libcxx] r272632 - Ignore depricated warnings from and
evil. Hope that clears things up. /Eric On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:26:11AM -, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Author: ericwf > > Date: Mon Jun 13 22
Re: [PATCH] D15899: Add -fno-movt frontend option, to disable movt/movw on ARM
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:29 PM Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:12:34PM +, Dimitry Andric via cfe-commits > wrote: > > In rL256641, @davide turned off movt generation by default for FreeBSD. > > Th
Re: [PATCH] D14872: PR25575: Make GCC 4.4+ comatible layout for packed bit-fileds of char type
On Nov 25, 2015 1:53 PM, "hfin...@anl.gov via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > hfinkel added inline comments. > > > Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:2783 > @@ -2783,1 +2782,3 @@ > + "the newer
Re: [PATCH] D12466: Fix empty -L Path on OSX hosts
Is this testable? On Nov 25, 2015 5:56 PM, "Martell Malone via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. > Closed by commit rL254117: Driver: protect from empty -L args (authored by > ma
Re: [PATCH] D15641: [Driver] Pass -O* to the gold plugin via -plugin-opt
ver picked, and that can significantly change the backend's behaviour. This isn't about linker optimizations. James On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 at 15:50 Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:53:58PM +, James Molloy wrot
Re: [PATCH] D15641: [Driver] Pass -O* to the gold plugin via -plugin-opt
rger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:31:45PM +, James Molloy via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Evidently not, at least not completely. I see codegen differences with > this > > patch (and at least one significant improvement).
Re: [cfe-users] Reproducible builds
. hth... don On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Stephan Gatzka via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I just added support for reproducible builds (-frandom-seed=) into the > qbs build system. > > For a automated test case I'd like to have a small s
Re: [cfe-users] [cfe-dev] lists.llvm.org server maintenance, Friday Dec 18 @10:30 PST
___ cfe-dev mailing list cfe-...@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev -- John Criswell Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell
Re: [cfe-users] Error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' storage class specifier [-Wregister] when building Boost 1.69.0
You could add -Wno-register to the compilation flags, or remove the use of the register keyword from boost, or not compile in C++17 mode? - Dave On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 1:10 PM Osman Zakir via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > When I tried to build Boost with LLVM, I got
Re: [cfe-users] How do I make CMake use LLD
gt; y.o" to produce a.out), so you can add to your linker flags "-fuse-ld=lld" > to tell the compiler wrapper to lld. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:06 AM Itaru Kitayama via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Keeping the system li
Re: [cfe-users] dumb question about record-command-line
c) to dump the contents of that section. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:44 AM Jerry Scharf via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have an exceeding dumb question. > > If I turn on -frecord-command-line, how do I view it in the object > files, libraries and
Re: [cfe-users] DeclRefExpr question
. On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:33 PM Robert Ankeney via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Let's assume I have a DeclRefExpr that is referenceing some variable that > is declared as "static const int var;". How can I determine the variable is > static? Th
Re: [cfe-users] DeclRefExpr question
hat's being referenced (could be a function, etc, > etc) then do whatever you want to do with that VarDecl. > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:33 PM Robert Ankeney via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Let's assume I have a DeclRefExpr that is referen
Re: [cfe-users] Clang optimization options with out dead code elimination?
izersn (address, memory, undefined behavior sanitizer) to help identify if there are bugs that could be fixed. On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:19 AM Guofeng Zhang via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We use clang 8+. Does clang have options (not -O0) that do not remove d
Re: [cfe-users] clangd --clang-tidy: // NOLINT only works sometimes
+Sam in case he's got some thoughts or can rope in others who might. On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:03 PM tastytea via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > I recently started using clangd (9.0.1) with --clang-tidy. I noticed > that suppressing diagnostics only some
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D13574: [LLDB] Fix Clang-tidy misc-use-override warnings in some files in include/lldb/Core; other minor fixes.
Greg Clayton via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > clayborg accepted this revision. > clayborg added a comment. > This revision is now accepted and ready to land. > > We are pretty inconsistent with the space after a function name and before > the ( so I
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r252353 - Fix Linux tests after r252348.
Thanks, sorry about that. On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:32 PM Chaoren Lin via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: chaoren > Date: Fri Nov 6 16:30:30 2015 > New Revision: 252353 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=252353&view=rev >
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D23545: Minidump parsing
I would prefer to use llvm types to do the parsing wherever possible. Why do we need DataExtractor? If the only reason is to force little endian, just use the types in llvm/Endian.h On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM Dimitar Vlahovski via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D19215: normalize test file extension for test filenames
its@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > labath accepted this revision. > labath added a comment. > This revision is now accepted and ready to land. > > Ok, makes sense then, thanks for making sure it's necessary. > > I don't quite understand how the string makes it's way ther
Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D12683: Fix debugger shutdown when Python interpreter is loaded
What were the symptoms of this? How'd you find it? On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:47 PM Oleksiy Vyalov via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ovyalov created this revision. > ovyalov added a reviewer: clayborg. > ovyalov added a subscriber: lldb-commits. > >
Re: [llvm-bugs] Change to list permissions/announce only
ng mails coming directly to llvm-bugs - not sure where people have been getting the notion to email it directly) On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-bugs < llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > All, > > I plan to make the llvm-bugs announce-only (by bugzilla only
Re: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 25616] New: bug
ugzilla Admin >> Version unspecified >> Hardware PC >> OS Windows NT >> Status NEW >> Severity normal >> Priority P >> ComponentMail >> Assignee unassignedb...@nondot.org >> Reporter jerromelic...@yahoo.
[llvm-bugs] [Bug 26230] New: LLDB generates superfluous "running" public events
ty: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: lab...@google.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified LLDB generates the following sequence of public events when stepping over a c
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] d551e40 - [AIX] Change the code based on https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20201214/864235.html
LOG: [AIX] Change the code based on https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20201214/864235.html Summary: change the code based on the discussion as: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20201214/864235.html Added: Modified: llvm/lib/Target
Re: [lldb-dev] Two CLs requiring changes to the Xcode project
15, at 5:39 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I submitted r252993 and 252994. These changes will require a > corresponding change in the Xcode workspace. Would anyone mind making > those changes for me?
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] lists.llvm.org server maintenance, Friday Dec 18 @10:30 PST
___ cfe-dev mailing list cfe-...@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev -- John Criswell Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell
[lldb-dev] [Bug 26230] New: LLDB generates superfluous "running" public events
ty: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: lab...@google.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified LLDB generates the following sequence of public events when stepping over a c
Re: [lldb-dev] All windows Mutex objects are recursive???
Yes, eventually we should move to std::mutex and std::condition_variable, in which case it behaves as expected (std::mutex is non recursive, std::mutex is recursive). On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:20 PM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > From lldb/source/Hos
Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure with VS 2015 Update 3
Compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit? This question looks relevant: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743144/using-stdatomic-with-aligned-classes On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Philippe Lavoie via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello, > > has anyone tried to co
