Hi, I'll take a look and see what actual codepath is being triggered. That might give us some insight into the current behaviour. Because like you I don't like doing things when we don't exactly know why they're necessary.
James On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 at 17:48 Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:31:45PM +0000, James Molloy via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Evidently not, at least not completely. I see codegen differences with > this > > patch (and at least one significant improvement). > > I don't mind the patch as is, but it seems to be a move in the wrong > direction by hiding the real issue. Just saying. > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
