Mailing lists matching lists.llvm.org

cfe-commits lists.llvm.org
lldb-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-branch-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-bugs lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D19959: [scan-build] fix warning emitted on Clang Driver code baseFix a "logic error" warning of the type Called c++ object pointer isnull" reported by Clang Static Analyzer on the file:-

Should this be a test, or just an assertion? On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Apelete Seketeli via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > apelete created this revision. > apelete added reviewers: kevin.qin, rsmith. > apelete added a subscriber: cfe-commits. > > S

Re: r273950 -

Did you land this intentionally? What was the commit message supposed to be? On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Chris Dewhurst via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: lerochris > Date: Mon Jun 27 17:11:12 2016 > New Revision: 273950 > > URL: http:/

Re: [PATCH] D17741: adds __FILE_BASENAME__ builtin macro

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > thakis added a comment. > > > I think we can do this separately. A "basename" macro is easier for > programmers to use and no build system change needed. > > &

Re: [PATCH] D17983: Eliminate many benign instances of "potentially uninitialized local variable" warnings

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Riccio via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ariccio added a comment. > > Oh, and by the way, what's the policy on using `enum class`es instead of C > style enums? I bet the compiler would have fewer false positive

Re: [PATCH] D15421: [Feature] Add a builtin for indexing into parameter packs

Following Louis' suggestion, how about __pack_nth? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Nathan Wilson via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Richard Smith > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Nathan

Re: r254143 - Fix for merging decls in pragma weak

I've reverted the commit in r254605. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > Please fix or revert this patch. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Thu,

Re: r254574 - PR17381: Treat undefined behavior during expression evaluation as an unmodeled

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:32:14PM -0800, Richard Smith via cfe-commits > wrote: > > C11 6.3.1.5/1: "If the value being converted is outside the range of > values &

Re: [PATCH]: git-clang-format

+djasper On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM Alexander Shukaev via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Please, consider applying the attached patch or (at your option) a > refined version of it upstream. I'd be very excited to see it make

Re: [PATCH] D15506: [ASTMatchers] Allow hasName() to look through inline namespaces

MSVC 2013 Update 5 accepts for (bool SkipUnwritten : {false, true}). Possibly changed in one of the Updates? 2015-12-14 23:35 GMT+02:00 Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>: > aaron.ballman added a subscriber: aaron.ballman. > > &g

Re: [PATCH] D15641: [Driver] Pass -O* to the gold plugin via -plugin-opt

Evidently not, at least not completely. I see codegen differences with this patch (and at least one significant improvement). James On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 at 16:31, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:59:03PM +, James M

Re: [PATCH] D15584: [CMake] Support a simple case for bootstrap builds to generate PGO data

Uh, did you intend to commit this prior to Justin or others giving an LGTM? On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:59 PM Phabricator via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. > Closed by commit rL256069: [CMak

Re: [cfe-users] finding in which function/method/scope a Decl is in, the parent so to say

function/method scope. DeclContext can also be cast to other Decl types, so for example you could use dyn_cast to get the function scope. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:06 AM, folkert via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > How can I find the parent of a VarDecl? The

Re: [cfe-users] Syncing up clang and clang-tools-extra with llvm for git

+Adrian for questions about dsymutil. Though I'm not quite sure how the subject line relates to the question? On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:03 PM Michael Eisel via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hitting some segfault when I run dsymutil without an

Re: [cfe-users] Getting underlying type for `using typename` declaration

On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 23:20, Victor “LOST” Milovanov via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi CFE users! > > > > I am trying to get a `QualType` instance from > `UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl`. Unlike `TypeAliasDecl` > `UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl` does no

Re: [cfe-users] constexpr pointer-to-member-function broken in Clang 9?

On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 10:42, Michael Price - Dev via cfe-users < cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Should this be ill-formed? > > struct C { > constexpr C() {} > constexpr bool f() const { return true; } > }; > constexpr C c{}; > > constexpr bool fail

Re: [cfe-users] Template parameter matcher?

< cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm looking for a matcher for variables whose type is a template > parameter. For example: > > template > T tVal; // Match tVal > int func(T tParam); // Match tParam > int i = func(tVal); // Match tVal

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D13241: [LLDB][MIPS] Fix hit_count for mips watchpoints

Can you add a test for this? On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:41 PM Jason Molenda via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > jasonmolenda added a subscriber: jasonmolenda. > jasonmolenda added a comment. > > Greg's out this week, he or Jim may want to comment. >

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D14790: cmake: add -DLLDB_ALLOW_STATIC_BINDINGS=1, defaults off

zturner added a comment. Kamil, the situation is a little complicated, please read the following threads for some context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-November/008802.html http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-November/008829.html http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Updated documentation for SBAddress

Can you upload the patch to http://reviews.llvm.org/differential/ (we do all of the code review there)? On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM John Lindal via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I never heard back on this. Should I file a ticket? > > Thanks, > John

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 28237] New: Debian mipsel package does not build

Priority: P Component: new bugs Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org Reporter: daniel.sand...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified See: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-3.8&arch=mipsel&a

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 27438] New: EfficiencySanitizer tool ideas

Priority: P Component: compiler-rt Assignee: bruen...@google.com Reporter: bruen...@google.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified This is a container feature request to serve as a venue for submitting ideas for dynamic

Re: [lldb-dev] Benchmark tests

Hey Jason, Are you the benchmark user? -Todd On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is anyone using the benchmark tests? None of the command line options > <https://docs.google.com

Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] 'final' has been tagged

gt; Many thanks for all your work! > Hans > > [1]. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-March/009883.html > _______ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3

Upgraded the libc++ bots. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Chris Bieneman via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you ma

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Please write release notes!

Added MSSA note in r277739. Thanks for the heads up! On Aug 3, 2016 9:55 PM, "Dmitry Polukhin via cfe-dev" < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Renato, > > Thank you for the summary of abi_tags changes for the release notes. I > think everything is correct.

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution: Next Phase

Should we consider adding git hyper-blame to llvm and recommending its usage? https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chrome-infra-docs/flat/depot_tools/docs/html/git-hyper-blame.html On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:44 AM Ed Maste via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 19 Augus

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

vista. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:22 PM Chunseok Lee via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is there any prebuilt lldb binary for windows7? > I tried snapshot llvm binary 3.8, but it does not include lldb. Note that > latest prebuilt(4.0) contains lldb

Re: [lldb-dev] unaligned cast in TCPSocket::Connect

I believe you are correct. We should create an in_addr on the stack and memcpy into it. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:52 AM Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > TCPSocket::Connect has this line: > > host_str = ::inet_ntoa (*(struct in_addr

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI, Phabricator is really slow due to HN about LLD

Have they come back? the instance appeared to reboot cleanly and the pages are serving... I'll dig into this in a couple of hours when I can. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:37 PM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 17 February 2017 at 19:23, Chandler Carrut

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [4.0.0 Release] 'final' has been tagged

Hi, built and passed core tests on OpenMandriva x86_64, aarch64, x86_32 and armv7hl. ttyl bero On 9 March 2017 at 01:52, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > The final version of 4.0.0 was just tagged (from the 4.0 bran

Re: [lldb-dev] Emacs LLDB support & the GDB/MI Interface

You are probably got it but yes, -file-list-exec-source-files and -break-list commands are not implemented yet. I'll try to find the time to fix it. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > From: "Ted Woodward"

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

SLES11 binaries for rc3 uploaded. 55b63de8adc12c67eb11abcf1a5f7132cca59b4e clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged

Re: [lldb-dev] [GSoC] Re-implement lldb-mi on top of the LLDB public API

Thank you, Leonard, I'm going to keep contributing to LLVM, so I think this is not the end! On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:15 PM Leonard Mosescu wrote: > Nice to see great progress in this area! > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Александр Поляков via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@l

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 8.0.0-rc2 has been tagged from the release_80 branch at r353413. > > Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. > > I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possibl

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-final has been tagged

M Tom Stellard via Release-testers < > release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The 8.0.1 final release has been tagged. Testers please upload the final >> binaries. >> >> -Tom >> ___ &g

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Website is not being updated

I see a bunch of eros here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/www-scripts/2019-November/thread.html Is this possibly related to the Github/monorepo transition? -- Jonas On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:52 AM Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev wrote: > > Hello Tanya, > > it looks like the cron

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

ase-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results. > > -Tom > > ___ > Release-testers mailing list > release-test...@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

Hi, I finished testing llvm-11.0.1-rc2 on Power PC 64-bit Little Endian for - Ubuntu 18.04 - Red Hat 7.4 I have uploaded the binaries from IBM. The sha1 files are attached. Thanks, Ahsan Saghir. On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 01:33, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

x27;s not as helpful for me to offer feedback this late in the release cycle. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:11 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged LLVM 12.0.0-rc3. Testers may begin testing and uploading > binaries. &

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

< release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 13.0.0-rc3. This will likely be the last rc unless there are > critical bugs that are found. Please test the release and report results. > > -Tom > > ___ > Release-

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

inux-gnueabihf.tar.xz 5c363a8e145e4b9985403aa89f496c550ff68423febd350d2a70c0f993b00b29 LLVM-13.0.1-rc1-woa64.zip Same test results as 13.0.0. Cheers, Diana On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 07:07, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Teste

Re: Patch bug 27628

mmits mailing list llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-co

Re: [PATCH] D34728: [ThinkLTO] Invoke build(Thin)?LTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.

pository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D34728 > > > > ___ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > __

Re: [PATCH] D34992: Emit static constexpr member as available_externally definition

_bug.cgi?id=31860 . > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D34992 > > > > ___ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > __

Re: [PATCH] D42157: [clang-cl] Let /FA output use intel assembly.

n > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D42157 > > > > ___ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits ___ cfe-commits maili

Re: [PATCH] D30768: [PATCH][VFS] Ignore broken symlinks in the directory iterator.

s://reviews.llvm.org/D30768 > > > > ___ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm

Re: [PATCH] Canonicalize UnaryTransformType types when they don't have a known underlying type

___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: r257533 - D9600: Add scan-build python implementation

Yay! ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits -- Jon Roelofs jonat...@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D12834: add gcc abi_tag support

sberg added a subscriber: sberg. sberg added a comment. I can't figure out how to add code to someone else's Phabricator review, so sent it to the mailing list instead: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151207/144636.html> <http://lists.llvm.org/pi

Re: [cfe-users] __builtin_constant_p(), __builtin_expect() and __builtin_types_compatible_p() and __has_builtin()

iltin_types_compatible_p() ! > > Can I just assume these are all supported by all version of clang ? > > Chris > ___ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > https://l

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D34911: Enable parsing C++ names generated by lambda functions.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34911 > > > > ___ > lldb-commits mailing list > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.ll

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 30969] New: Merge r283728 into 3.9 branch.

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 30970] New: Merge r283729 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 30971] New: Merge r284003 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 30972] New: Merge r284001 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 25300] New: Certain environment variables crash lldb-server

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: bob.eric.nel...@gmail.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 39727] New: Support for breakpad symbols in LLDB

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: d...@google.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, mose...@google.com LLDB should be able to consume breakpad symbols. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36595] New: Pathname expansion fails as argument to process launch

Severity: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: t.william.schm...@gmail.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 26677] New: LLDB does not report Linux signal 35 (SIGRTMIN+1)

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: eugen...@hotmail.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 27510] New: TestBitfields fails on linux with clang>=3.9

mal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: lab...@google.com CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26677] New: LLDB does not report Linux signal 35 (SIGRTMIN+1)

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: eugen...@hotmail.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27075] New: TestLldbGdbServer.software_breakpoint_set_and_remove_work fails on android arm with -mthumb

OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: chy...@google.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified xfail

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27510] New: TestBitfields fails on linux with clang>=3.9

mal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: lab...@google.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

Re: [lldb-dev] [IMPORTANT] bugzilla email notification enabled

FYI, email notification is re-enabled for bugzilla. Please note that user self-registration is still disabled for now and you should email llvm-ad...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-ad...@lists.llvm.org> for account creation. Thanks, Tanya > On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Tanya Lattn

Re: [lldb-dev] NetBSD buildbot new machine

arily unavailable. > > > > ___ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lldb

[lldb-dev] [Bug 30970] New: Merge r283729 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[lldb-dev] [Bug 30971] New: Merge r284003 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[lldb-dev] [Bug 30972] New: Merge r284001 into 3.9 branch

Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, tstel...@gmail.com Blocks: 30261 Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[lldb-dev] [Bug 34419] New: TopLevelExpressionsTestCase-test_top_level_expressions_dwarf fails on fedora

Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: dav...@freebsd.org CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org It took me quite a bit to reproduce, the log is attached. -- You

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36595] New: Pathname expansion fails as argument to process launch

Severity: normal Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: t.william.schm...@gmail.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

Re: [lldb-dev] Moderator needed for lldb-commits

out? > > Thanks, > Tanya > ___ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] [Bug 39727] New: Support for breakpad symbols in LLDB

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: d...@google.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, mose...@google.com LLDB should be able to consume breakpad symbols. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0-final has been tagged

0-final. Testers, please upload the final binaries. > > Thanks, > Tom > ___ > Release-testers mailing list > release-test...@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers ___

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-final has been tagged.

: > > Hi, > > I've tagged 11.1.0-final, testers may begin uploading binaries now. > > -Tom > > ___ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev build_llvm_111

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Simplifying logging code

; macro. (Gasp!) > > ___ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://

[lldb-dev] [Bug 25300] New: Certain environment variables crash lldb-server

Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: bob.eric.nel...@gmail.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Classification: Unclassified -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang][CallGraphSection] Add type id metadata to indirect call and targets (PR #117036)

https://github.com/Prabhuk created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117036 Create and add generalized type identifier metadata to indirect calls, and to functions that may be target to indirect calls. Original RFC: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-June/151044.html

Re: r253269 - Make FP_CONTRACT ON the default.

Operations with multiple uses shouldn't be contracted." > > > Don't have a small repro yet :( > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:39 PM Hal Finkel via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > wrote: > > > - Original Message - > &

Re: Add warning for c++ member variable shadowing

if we call A.bases() directly. Thanks James From: Saleem Abdulrasool Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 7:10 PM To: James Sun Cc: "cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org" , Aaron Ballman , Richard Smith Subject: Re: Add warning for c++ member variable shadowing Some more stylistic

RE: r296554 - [PS4] Set our default dialect to C++11. NFC for other targets.

7, at 11:22 PM, Sean Silva via cfe-commits mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Nice! -- Sean Silva On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Paul Robinson via cfe-commits mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Author: probinson Date: Tue Feb 28 19:01:10 2017 New Revision: 296554

Re: [libcxx] r250319 - [libcxx] Make it drastically simpler to link libc++.

gen_link_script.py is missing a license header. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Alexey Samsonov via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Seems to work now, thanks for the quick fix! > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote: > >> Hi Alex

Re: [lldb-dev] Conditionally adding sources to the build

a single cpp file. If you'll need to group more than one file this way, then maybe a subfolder would make more sense though. pl On 1 December 2016 at 00:30, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Unfortunately you will need to separate them at the director

Re: [lldb-dev] Xcode and Pascal (FPC)

e compiler. Another is that FPC does add the indication but LLDB is not looking for it, and always does case-sensitive matching. This would be a bug in LLDB. In either case it seems there is no good workaround. --paulr > -Original Message- > From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@li

RE: r254574 - PR17381: Treat undefined behavior during expression evaluation as an unmodeled

@gmail.com [mailto:meta...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Richard Smith Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 12:43 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Joerg Sonnenberger; cfe-commits (cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org) Subject: Re: r254574 - PR17381: Treat undefined behavior during expression evaluation as an unmodeled On

Re: r326168 - Attempt to fix greendragon bot after r326141

Reid re-committed r326141 this morning (and followed up with r326144), and I don't think either of those have been reverted? From: Zachary Turner Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 9:47 PM To: Adam Nemet Cc: Shoaib Meenai , "cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org" , Reid Kleckner Subje

[cfe-users] cfe-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4

Send cfe-users mailing list submissions to cfe-users@lists.llvm.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cfe-users-requ...@lists.llvm.org You can

Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple

the code, >> before I start moving VersionTuple into llvm. >> >> cheers, >> pl >> On Tue, 8 May 2018 at 19:46, Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 8, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Greg Cl

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [GitHub] RFC: Enforcing no merge commit policy

Honestly I'm looking forward to GitHub's interface here. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 1:25 PM James Y Knight via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think we definitely will want to support github PRs, at the very least > as an _option_, even if we continue running/

Re: [libcxx] r249929 - Split out of .

> want to make sure we get it right. If we can't land it over the weekend I'll > ask Richard to revert while we work on it. > > /Eric > > On Oct 23, 2015 10:13 PM, "Michael Zolotukhin via cfe-commits" > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: &g

Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

I updated llvmlibc's to 2.8.4 and that seemed to solve the connection problem: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f60686f35cc89504f3411f49cf16a651a74be6eb Best, Paula Askar On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Andrzej Warzynski via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lis

Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f60686f35cc89504f3411f49cf16a651a74be6eb > > > > Best, > > Paula Askar > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Andrzej Warzynski via llvm-dev > > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wr

Re: r267534 - [MSVC] PR27337: allow static_cast from private base to derived for WTL

Is it needed to parse system headers? In general, we implement things like this if they're needed for system headers but don't otherwise. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry Polukhin via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I added example with 'B*&#x

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

15, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Cristianno Martins via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello there, > > First, I would like to say that I don't have any strong opinions on this > matter: as mostly an user of LLVM, my basic concern is for me to be able to > identify w

Re: [Lldb-commits] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f60686f35cc89504f3411f49cf16a651a74be6eb > > > > Best, > > Paula Askar > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Andrzej Warzynski via llvm-dev > > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wr

Re: [Lldb-commits] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

I updated llvmlibc's to 2.8.4 and that seemed to solve the connection problem: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f60686f35cc89504f3411f49cf16a651a74be6eb Best, Paula Askar On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Andrzej Warzynski via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lis

RE: [PATCH] D51806: [clang-cl] Enable -march

Selvaraj via Phabricator Cc : Alexandre Ganea ; cfe-commits Objet : Re: [PATCH] D51806: [clang-cl] Enable -march On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:33 AM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator via cfe-commits mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: hans added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/

Re: r358402 - clang-format vs plugin: Visual Studio 2019 support

>> (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/tools/clang-format-vs/source.extension.vsixmanifest.in Mon Apr >> 15 06:02:03 2019 >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ >> license.txt >> >> >> - >> + >> >> >

Re: [clang] 4711512 - Fix oversight in AST traversal helper

later. On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 3:32 PM Stephen Kelly via cfe-commits mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Author: Stephen Kelly Date: 2020-01-05T20:27:37Z New Revision: 471151238438201f3fe365a7784f1a091328e46c URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro

RE: r285733 - clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/convergent.cl: Satisfy -Asserts with "opt -instnamer".

I don't understand why we need this extra step in testing now? Did anything fail? Thanks, Anastasia -Original Message- From: cfe-commits [mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits Sent: 01 November 2016 20:08 To: cfe-commits@lists.llv

Re: r295592 - clang/CMakeLists.txt: Rework r294954 -- use file(TO_CMAKE_PATH).

; >>find_program(LLVM_TABLEGEN_EXE "llvm-tblgen" ${LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR} >> NO_DEFAULT_PATH) >> >> >> _______ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/c

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >