Following Louis' suggestion, how about __pack_nth? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Nathan Wilson via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Nathan Wilson <nwilso...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> nwilson added a comment. >>> >>> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421#326144, @rsmith wrote: >>> >>> > Bikeshedding on the name a bit... how about `__type_pack_element`? >>> >>> Hmm, I kind of felt like having `nth` in there implied we're indexing >>> into something... What about `__nth_pack_element`? >> >> >> Conversely, std::nth_element doesn't do indexing, and std::tuple_element >> does. >> > > Yeah, I was trying to combine them, but maybe that's misleading. > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
