On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Riccio via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> ariccio added a comment. > > Oh, and by the way, what's the policy on using `enum class`es instead of C > style enums? I bet the compiler would have fewer false positives with > strongly typed enums? > Don't think we have a policy - a discussion on llvm-dev (+cfe-dev) might be worth getting buy in before you start writing patches to do widescale changes to enum classes (probably first thing is to check all the supported compilers support that feature, though) - Dave > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17983 > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
