Re: [EXEC][POLL] Raising the Java platform from Java 8 to 11 EXEC-123

2024-10-17 Thread Xeno Amess
+1 for 11 even better if 17 From: Gary Gregory Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 12:52:38 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [EXEC][POLL] Raising the Java platform from Java 8 to 11 EXEC-123 Hi All: To support https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXEC-123, it

Re: Is log4j 2.25.0(or at least a rc at release nexus) release soon?

2024-10-17 Thread Xeno Amess
Thanks! would try 2.25.0-SNAPSHOT for a while then. Piotr P. Karwasz 于2024年10月17日周四 14:24写道: > Hi Xeno, > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 06:05, Xeno Amess wrote: > > I ask, because a pretty large improvement in 2.25.0 will be graalvm > > native-image support, and I happen t

Is log4j 2.25.0(or at least a rc at release nexus) release soon?

2024-10-16 Thread Xeno Amess
I ask, because a pretty large improvement in 2.25.0 will be graalvm native-image support, and I happen to be a graalvm native-image user recently... So I wanna hear about the possibility of getting a 2.25.0 or 2.25.0-rc1 package from the official. But just ask, no need to hurry, we can always pack

Re: [CLI] Javadoc

2024-10-16 Thread Xeno Amess
t 15, 2024 at 9:56 AM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > yep, I always think, this kind of allow null not allow null things shall > be > > marked not by doc, but by annotations. > > > > Xeno Amess 于2024年10月15日周二 04:10写道: > > > > > 1. important jetbrains annotat

Re: [CLI] Javadoc

2024-10-15 Thread Xeno Amess
yep, I always think, this kind of allow null not allow null things shall be marked not by doc, but by annotations. Xeno Amess 于2024年10月15日周二 04:10写道: > 1. important jetbrains annotations as maven dependency. > 2.add @Nullable in parent class's param > 3.add @NotNull at chi

Re: [CLI] Javadoc

2024-10-14 Thread Xeno Amess
1. important jetbrains annotations as maven dependency. 2.add @Nullable in parent class's param 3.add @NotNull at child class param From: Gary D. Gregory Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 3:29:20 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [CLI] Javadoc Hi All, We now

Re: Successor to mailing lists

2024-10-14 Thread Xeno Amess
python...sigh. 发件人: Gary Gregory 发送时间: 星期二, 十月 15, 2024 3:59:10 上午 收件人: Apache Logging Developers List 主题: Re: Successor to mailing lists I'll admit that I rely on PonyMail. It seems we (Apache) should have a professional (paid for is ok) set up for this, not a

Re: thought: allow exclude dependencies from parent in maven4?

2024-10-11 Thread Xeno Amess
es from > parents. > Typically, you inherit too much and that means you'll have to add excludes > for the > dependency analyzer plugin as well... it's a mess. > > -- Richard > > > On 25. Sep 2024, at 17:17, Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > and another idea be

Re: Successor to mailing lists

2024-10-10 Thread Xeno Amess
and some of our guys cannot reach github due to network/law reasons. Gary Gregory 于2024年10月10日周四 20:00写道: > I thought this was recently discussed on @members, but now I can't find the > thread! I'm not even sure if it was on @members, which exemplifies the > scaling problem discussed on the list

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge ITs in maven

2024-10-10 Thread Xeno Amess
do there really be...some widely used 3rd-party distribution (non-apache) for maven? I know this situation be true for openjdk, but for maven I really didn't notice any... Anders Hammar 于2024年10月10日周四 15:26写道: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:46 AM Herve Boutemy wrote: > > > > I always has seen thi

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge ITs in maven

2024-10-09 Thread Xeno Amess
RAT checks has a excluding rule, if we really wanna so we can just exclude that folder anyway... Guillaume Nodet 于2024年10月9日周三 15:11写道: > I just pushed a branch with the results: >https://github.com/gnodet/maven/tree/merge-its > > This is just the raw output of the recipe. The ITs are not i

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge ITs in maven

2024-10-08 Thread Xeno Amess
Sigh. This shall be a typical scenario for git submodule, but as we all know, git submodule is something designed so disaster that nearly shit, if not worse than shit. .I myself vote +1 for the merge if I have the right to, for now, but like Herve Boutemy said if we could know why guys split them

Re: [validator] Collections 4

2024-10-01 Thread Xeno Amess
after all a nexus server is easy to setup... From: Xeno Amess Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 1:41:40 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [validator] Collections 4 well if you be very hurry you can use a fork for some months... (like what I did for

Re: [validator] Collections 4

2024-10-01 Thread Xeno Amess
well if you be very hurry you can use a fork for some months... (like what I did for tomcat&maven... From: Josh Fenlason Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 11:40:58 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [validator] Collections 4 Gary, I appreciate all the work

Re: thought: allow exclude dependencies from parent in maven4?

2024-09-25 Thread Xeno Amess
and another idea be we could add a and (kind of mirror to dependencies and dependencyManagement) to remove those dependencies from parent &EVERY dependency... Xeno Amess 于2024年9月25日周三 22:59写道: > Hi. > > In maven3 we cannot exclude dependencies inherited from parent. > >

thought: allow exclude dependencies from parent in maven4?

2024-09-25 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi. In maven3 we cannot exclude dependencies inherited from parent. see this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2681759/is-there-anyway-to-exclude-artifacts-inherited-from-a-parent-pom That be kind of annoying if situation comes to be the parent-pom be maintained by others, and you extend it an

Re: [DISCUSSION] activating Reproducible Builds by default in Maven 4

2024-09-25 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi. if web-download cache be in part of your, Reproducible Builds? Jorge Solórzano 于2024年9月25日周三 22:26写道: > There are some solutions/alternatives here: > > 1) Fixed value by default. > 2) Warning to the user for having reproducible builds off. > 3) Use the SCM last commit date. > > I have worked

Re: upgrade jdk 17 used in maven jenkins cicd

2024-09-24 Thread Xeno Amess
glad to hear about that. Guillaume Nodet 于2024年9月24日周二 21:56写道: > I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-26146 > a few days ago for that. > > Le mar. 24 sept. 2024 à 15:41, Xeno Amess a écrit : > > > > Hi all. > > No mean to be off

Re: upgrade jdk 17 used in maven jenkins cicd

2024-09-24 Thread Xeno Amess
maybe also should add to readme that this repo can only be built on 17.0.11+, but I'm not quite sure whether it suitable Xeno Amess 于2024年9月24日周二 21:41写道: > Hi all. > No mean to be offensive but maven repo's master branch failed ci (again) > for quite a long time. > Tha

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-18 Thread Xeno Amess
Spring did the upgrade first" or something lol Gary Gregory 于2024年9月17日周二 05:03写道: > I think that for now I am leaning towards staying on Java 8. > > Gary > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, 3:42 AM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > for 90%+ normal user

Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap

2024-09-14 Thread Xeno Amess
s public domain. On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 9:01 AM Xeno Amess wrote: > why not write an email to lea ..maybe he be so kind that would be glad to > offer one mit-like license copy of that class > > From: Melloware Inc > Sent: Saturday, September 1

Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap

2024-09-14 Thread Xeno Amess
, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap I submitted this PR years ago using ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap from Doug Lea and the Netty team but Gary had concerns from legal about being able to use it. PR is here: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56 On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 7:22 AM Xeno Amess wrote: >

Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap

2024-09-14 Thread Xeno Amess
I thought old d-lea bro have a concurrent weak hashmap implement somewhere...why not just ask him after all nobody here more expert than him in this area From: Niall Pemberton Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 1:46:32 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re:

Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap

2024-09-14 Thread Xeno Amess
good and should did it 5 years ago From: Niall Pemberton Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 1:46:32 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > Hi A

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-14 Thread Xeno Amess
for 90%+ normal user each version under which spring using be OK From: Richard Zowalla Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 12:59:15 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0 My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosy

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-28 Thread Xeno Amess
> This works if you also change the package to something like org.apache.commons.compress2 Yas, I mean this. Elliotte Rusty Harold 于2024年2月28日周三 20:44写道: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 1:43 PM Piotr P. Karwasz > wrote: > > > > Hi Elliotte, > > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 13:20, Elliotte Rusty Harold

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-28 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi Andrew. > Is this the wrong place for such a question? It is the right place. > how I should find an answer For your own usage you can just add such dependency. For a long-time solution, this usually takes months(sometime even years) for community to decide how to do. Of course this sounds quite

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-02-28 Thread Xeno Amess
+1 as a user Frederik Boster 于2024年2月28日周三 16:15写道: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 08:31 Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java b

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-27 Thread Xeno Amess
ion then move on. Not everybody will be happy but we'll stop cycles hopefully and unhappy people will be able to work on solutions after anyway. Le mar. 27 févr. 2024 à 20:02, Aleksandar Kurtakov a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:16 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > whose vote would c

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-27 Thread Xeno Amess
whose vote would count and what be the majority:) for example should my vote count? or not? or just some committers? but why just committers(or not)(as some of them might have less contributions even than non-committers)? or just pmc? or everyone share 1 vote(wow I don't think it shall work this wa

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-23 Thread Xeno Amess
//www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 23 févr. 2024 à 15:10, Tamás Cservenák a > écrit : > > > Make love not var! > > > > T > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:09 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-23 Thread Xeno Amess
I hate var. From: Tamás Cservenák Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 9:52:08 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven Howdy, Some more stats based on 2nd package from Brian https://gist.github.com/cstamas/8207f8d70882090a1c63cdedc

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-22 Thread Xeno Amess
submodules (and letting users pick what they need) seems reasonable... If an all-in-one entry is really needed, we still have the SPI solution. Xeno Amess 于2024年2月23日周五 00:23写道: > > What I've been going in some projects is to never use Maven optional > dependencies and split Maven

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-22 Thread Xeno Amess
> What I've been going in some projects is to never use Maven optional dependencies and split Maven projects into multi-module ones and never use optional dependencies when I care about what depends on what. I love this... just like what done in vfs right?. Gary Gregory 于2024年2月23日周五 00:14写道: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-22 Thread Xeno Amess
> The raw numbers are a more reasonable picture. Elliotte, this is just the begin of maven 4, and maven 4.x is not just for current projects, but for projects in the next several years.(and I guess nobody here wanna increasing jdk major version during a same maven major version?) So if we agree tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

2024-02-21 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi. I use toolchain for multi-release-jars please don't drop it or provide another way for building multi release jars From: Romain Manni-Bucau Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 3:48:43 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven H

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

2024-02-20 Thread Xeno Amess
e the latest maven version to build? We are not slaves nor babysitters for kids after all. If they want third party maintenance they can just pay for that, or hire some group, I just don't think it that hard. like just what azul or jetbrains jbm do... Xeno Amess 于2024年2月21日周三 13:41写道: > Yo

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

2024-02-20 Thread Xeno Amess
You are not the only one who hates jigsaw. As a real joke, about 4-6 years ago in a jackson mailing list, an [oracle employee] ask for them to delete module-info in the jars to make it runnable at lower jdk version, so yes even people in oracle (at least one) seems don't really agree with jigsaw..

Re: Migrate *all* Issue Tracking and Discussions to GitHub

2024-02-13 Thread Xeno Amess
+1. From: Matt Sicker Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 1:22:48 AM To: Apache Logging Developers List Subject: Re: Migrate *all* Issue Tracking and Discussions to GitHub I think it’s a good idea, especially since Jira registrations are closed. > On Feb 13, 2024

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

2024-02-05 Thread Xeno Amess
well I just doubt. From: Xeno Amess Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 12:18:42 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Java version for Maven 4? well nothing affensive but do any guys got any payments from those still-java-6 companies for maintaining maven for

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

2024-02-05 Thread Xeno Amess
well nothing affensive but do any guys got any payments from those still-java-6 companies for maintaining maven for them? From: Gary Gregory Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 6:14:32 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Java version for Maven 4? An interestin

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

2024-02-05 Thread Xeno Amess
I vote for kill jdk8 out as to force them upgrade to 11+ From: Tamás Cservenák Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 10:35:55 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Java version for Maven 4? Howdy, See Inline. On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 3:01 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold w

Re: Why some of the files are not with ASF headers?

2024-01-30 Thread Xeno Amess
I'm not meaning about tecniqually(how to exclude some files from detection) but just, if we should do so. Xeno Amess 于2024年1月31日周三 11:08写道: > Is there any rules to allow some files not adding asf headers? Or actually > we shall add ASF headers to all files? >

Why some of the files are not with ASF headers?

2024-01-30 Thread Xeno Amess
Is there any rules to allow some files not adding asf headers? Or actually we shall add ASF headers to all files?

Re: The non-deterministic iteration order of Immutable Collections

2023-03-24 Thread Xeno Amess
maybe you can use some java agent to hack in the of function, and change it to some strange order, to make you see where goes wrong easier? Remi Forax 于2023年3月25日周六 06:13写道: > - Original Message - > > From: "Kasper Nielsen" > > To: "Chris Hegarty" > > Cc: "core-libs-dev" > > Sent: Fri

Re: [lang] Considering a new String utility class

2023-03-20 Thread Xeno Amess
Otherwise I doubt the cost... From: Xeno Amess Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 7:00:14 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] Considering a new String utility class I agree if it doesn't hurt more than 5% perfor

Re: [lang] Considering a new String utility class

2023-03-20 Thread Xeno Amess
I agree if it doesn't hurt more than 5% performance. From: Peter Verhas Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 4:16:17 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] Considering a new String utility class A few years ago when I refactored some code in this project, I c

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven Release 3.9.1 coming soon

2023-03-01 Thread Xeno Amess
well can we release a RC version instead? have a feeling it would become another months long waiting... From: Elliotte Rusty Harold Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 2:09:21 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Maven Release 3.9.1 coming soon https://

Re: And while I'm on the subject of logging

2023-02-24 Thread Xeno Amess
+1 for -e default From: Romain Manni-Bucau Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 9:15:15 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: And while I'm on the subject of logging Hi Elliotte, I agree -e should be the default, I don't see the point to not have the error cause

Re: And while I'm on the subject of logging

2023-02-23 Thread Xeno Amess
you can add a config or parameter to do this. BUT I need that log, please don't remove it From: Kemal Soysal Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 5:39:08 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: And while I'm on the subject of logging +1 logback > Am 23.02.2023 um

Re: [ALL][COMPRESS] POM version

2022-11-26 Thread Xeno Amess
or would you mind if I make one? From: Xeno Amess Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 2:29:53 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [ALL][COMPRESS] POM version good and could we add a ci checker for this? From: Gary Gregory

Re: [ALL][COMPRESS] POM version

2022-11-26 Thread Xeno Amess
good and could we add a ci checker for this? From: Gary Gregory Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2022 8:36:10 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [ALL][COMPRESS] POM version Hi all and release managers, A reminder that a POM version should never be a non-snapsho

Re: Switch Log4j to GitHub Issues

2022-11-05 Thread Xeno Amess
+1 for to guthub issues. well if people still care about jira we can try make a jira plugin to auto create jira issue for every pr. But I really doubt if there be many people really love jira that much... From: Gary Gregory Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2022 1:59:20 A

Re: [rng] Release 1.5 with Bill Of Materials (BOM)

2022-09-29 Thread Xeno Amess
even better if we have a BOM for whole apache commons. From: Gary Gregory Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 8:05:14 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [rng] Release 1.5 with Bill Of Materials (BOM) That sounds like a good idea! Gary On Thu, Sep 29, 20

Re: [VOTE] Terminology to replace master/slave in ActiveMQ

2022-05-06 Thread Xeno Amess
because that is actually what master/slave evolate, when in a new era. Xeno Amess 于2022年5月6日周五 20:33写道: > +1 for capitalist/worker > > Clebert Suconic 于2022年5月6日周五 20:27写道: > >> We already had this discussion before I think, and we decided for >> Primary/Backup >&

Re: [VOTE] Terminology to replace master/slave in ActiveMQ

2022-05-06 Thread Xeno Amess
+1 for capitalist/worker Clebert Suconic 于2022年5月6日周五 20:27写道: > We already had this discussion before I think, and we decided for > Primary/Backup > > > if you still want to keep the vote for that... > > [+1] primary/backup > [-1000] Leader/Follower > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 6:57 AM Robbie Gem

Re: Please verify your stuff.

2022-05-02 Thread Xeno Amess
I mean, even though some guy make it fails locally, CI shall stop manager for merging that pr, shouldn't it? XenoAmess From: Xeno Amess Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:23:11 PM To: dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Re: Please verify your stuff. I don't

Re: Please verify your stuff.

2022-05-02 Thread Xeno Amess
I don't understand. What is CI doing? XenoAmess From: Ralph Goers Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:58:50 PM To: dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Please verify your stuff. Remko, Did you run a full build of master when you committed your latest changes? I don’t see h

flink fails build when using LF line-ending in windows.

2022-05-01 Thread Xeno Amess
Why do you think it's good to make LF fail and make CRLF pass on windows?

Re: [beanutils]

2022-04-22 Thread Xeno Amess
Meanwhile, the bar in different apache group seems different. For example I think more than half committers in Apache Dobbo do not have enough ability to be an ASF committer, if we use the bar we used in commons. Xeno Amess 于2022年4月23日周六 13:26写道: > The bar to become an ASF committer is h

Re: [beanutils]

2022-04-22 Thread Xeno Amess
ases is a great way to get invited > into the PMC, too, so keep that in mind. > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:36 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > @Matt Sicker > > > > Like what I said before, there be no current active commons committers > who > > interested in

Re: [beanutils]

2022-04-20 Thread Xeno Amess
>>>> > >>>>> On 4/20/2022 2:26 PM, sebb wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 18:54, Melloware > wrote: > >>>>>> And and I have forked it and deployed to Maven Central > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > &

Re: [beanutils]

2022-04-20 Thread Xeno Amess
Well I wonder should we give melloware (https://github.com/melloware) a committer permission. Since: 1. he has quite some experience here, not a fresh hand. 2. he has ability to write/review good codes.(already several thousands lines in common-beanutils). 3. he has enough time and interest to

https://github.com/apache/xalan-java or https://github.com/apache/xalan-j ?

2022-04-16 Thread Xeno Amess
which should we create pr to?

Re: We need to lay down strategy

2022-04-10 Thread Xeno Amess
So..If I wanna make some refinements, I shall put them onto 4.0, means master, right? Slawomir Jaranowski 于2022年4月11日周一 03:20写道: > our CI has running build for branches: > - master > - 3.9.x > - 3.8.x > > It is only versions for which we can do changes, for others we simply don't > have runni

Re: New component proposal: commons-plugins

2022-04-04 Thread Xeno Amess
No, I think it is a little different, but commons-configuration can be its dependency. Gary Gregory 于2022年4月3日周日 18:24写道: > Should this be in Commons Configuration? > > Gary > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2022, 15:33 Matt Sicker wrote: > > > Hi all, I’ve got a proposal for a new Commons component that I’d

Re: New component proposal: commons-plugins

2022-04-04 Thread Xeno Amess
If you really want to start this, it would be useful. However it would be complicated, very very complicated. For example, version management. The plugins have their versions. And the base program has its version. And the plugin registration mechanism has its own version. How to make it work would

Re: [POOL] Archive pre-Java 7 versions?

2022-03-16 Thread Xeno Amess
I wonder, is it possible to push tomcat guys stop support versions before jdk8? Like, we try to find every dependencies of tomcat and persuade 1/3 of them to all abandon old version jdks, to force tomcat stop the support... XenoAmess From: Gary Gregory Sent: Thur

Re: Review of used reports for Maven project sites.

2022-02-26 Thread Xeno Amess
strongly suggest move maven-javadoc-plugin from *site *to *build* It is better to let the committer handle this when they get these codes, than letting the release manager handle this. Olivier Lamy 于2022年2月27日周日 08:46写道: > Thanks for the PRs. > I'd like to start a discussion rather than some c

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-16 Thread Xeno Amess
I suggest just migrate 1 or 2 tests first, and create a pr, and we discuss it there. Discussing without codes seems hollow. Gilles Sadowski 于2022年2月17日周四 09:16写道: > Hello. > > > [...] > > > > One more practical question: since the tests are not anymore based on the > > methods name and are indic

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-14 Thread Xeno Amess
(sigh) Do you think make some public activities would help? Like helding some online summer camp or something?

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-14 Thread Xeno Amess
nce, one be 2 years ago, another be 2 days ago, then actually we will automatically pick the 2 days ago one first. Xeno Amess 于2022年2月14日周一 23:42写道: > > Remember that creating a PR is not a guarantee of anything, it is a > request > in a queue, a queue managed by volunteers. >

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-14 Thread Xeno Amess
ore good reviewers. Gary Gregory 于2022年2月14日周一 23:37写道: > Remember that creating a PR is not a guarantee of anything, it is a request > in a queue, a queue managed by volunteers. > > Gary > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, 10:12 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > Code not ac

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-14 Thread Xeno Amess
> Code not actively developed does not attract newcomers. Well I have to say the reason for "codes not actively developed" is a strong lack of alive committers, or more detailed, reviewers. I have still 100+ unsolved prs in commons projects, some of which be 1 or 2 years ago, but it seems there ju

Re: [All] Maintenance (Re: [GitHub] [... PR] #104: Maven Wrapper [...])

2022-02-14 Thread Xeno Amess
> [2] Backed by the numbers provided the project's report to the ASF board (where the number of "committers" is utterly misleading wrt its actual effect on maintenance capacity). I'm also interested in why there are so many committers while small amounts of which really do commit during these yea

Re: [jackson-user] support Path in JsonFactory?

2022-02-11 Thread Xeno Amess
xpect actual trouble even if that > specific `readValue()` method was not called. > > -+ Tatu +- > > > > > Michael Rogers schrieb am Freitag, 11. Februar 2022 um 13:48:44 UTC+1: > >> > >> On 01/02/2022 18:28, Tatu Saloranta wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jan 2

Re: [jackson-user] support Path in JsonFactory?

2022-02-11 Thread Xeno Amess
t; >> On 01/02/2022 18:28, Tatu Saloranta wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:13 PM Xeno Amess > > <mailto:xeno...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Hi. >> > Is there any reason not support Path in JsonFactory and ObjectMapper? >> > If

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-10 Thread Xeno Amess
problem is that need adding some public api to HashMap or Collections. Yep, sounds like a better version of guava.newHashMap. Xeno Amess 于2022年2月9日周三 09:51写道: > I agree that it would >> be preferable for the expression to be something like this: > > (int) Math.ceil(expected / 0.

Re: [jackson-user] support Path in JsonFactory?

2022-02-09 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi. I checked your 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT branch in databind, which have support to path. I would like to wait for it. Thanks. Tatu Saloranta 于2022年2月2日周三 02:28写道: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:13 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > >> Hi. >> Is there any reason not support Path in JsonFactor

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-08 Thread Xeno Amess
oes what > probably > most users want, but it's confusing that its behavior differs from HashMap > in this > regard.) > > If we don't add a Java SE utility like "newHashMapWithExpectedSize", > fallbacks would > be to introduce an internal JDK utility meth

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
wait, things get interesting now. We do have such a test named ConstantDirectoryOptimalCapacity to make sure this does not happen, but my tests still fill under the idea debugger. Is there any specialist for help? I would dig in but it is a little complicated. [image: image.png] Xeno Amess 于2022

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
Sorry for my mistake. After a more throughout dig in, this thing has already fixed several years ago, at year 2015. Issue close. Xeno Amess 于2022年2月4日周五 21:40写道: > Besides, is it worthy to develop a public float Math.ceil(float) function? > > Xeno Amess 于2022年2月4日周五 21:39写道: > >

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
Besides, is it worthy to develop a public float Math.ceil(float) function? Xeno Amess 于2022年2月4日周五 21:39写道: > patch applied. > > Index: src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Module.java > IDEA additional info: > Subsystem: com.intellij.openapi.diff.impl.patch.Chars

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
this(Math.max((int) ((float)m.size() / DEFAULT_LOAD_FACTOR + 1.0F), +this(Math.max((int) Math.ceil(m.size() / DEFAULT_LOAD_FACTOR), DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY), DEFAULT_LOAD_FACTOR); putAll(m); Xeno Amess 于2022年2月4日周五 18:45写道: > also find some other places ha

Re: Commit Review Policy

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
l be the last item to > > confirm. > > > > I only want to show how the process can look. > > > > Currently we only have sentence that we use "Commit then Review" policy > > without more details > > > > pt., 4 lut 2022 o 11:58 Xeno Amess napis

Re: Commit Review Policy

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
uld do everything in order to understand the PR and > you must be convinced about the proposals almost like you were the author > of the PR even if you are not the author. > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 12:23 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > 3 days? > > according to my experien

Re: HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
also find some other places have same problem. If some of your already-in people aggree, I would create a pr, but according to the rules seems I should wait for now. Xeno Amess 于2022年2月4日周五 18:42写道: > import java.lang.reflect.Array; > import java.lang.reflect.Field; > import java.uti

HashMap.putAll can cause redundant space waste

2022-02-04 Thread Xeno Amess
import java.lang.reflect.Array; import java.lang.reflect.Field; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.Map; public class TestMap { public static void main(String[] args) throws NoSuchFieldException, IllegalAccessException { HashMap a = new HashMap<>(); fill12(a); H

can we make a release for rat? last release is at 4 years ago.

2022-02-03 Thread Xeno Amess
Quite some things have been updated since the 4 years and I do think it is worth a release. For myself I want the threadSafe on rat-plugin's checkMojo, as I heavily use parallel build.

Re: Commit Review Policy

2022-02-03 Thread Xeno Amess
3 days? according to my experience, usually you need 30 - 180 days. Tibor Digana 于2022年1月28日周五 06:40写道: > It's nice to write some rules but still the developers are not machines. > You can, for instance, get some vote for totally crazy things like removing > public method in a library which is w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.5 based on RC1

2022-01-31 Thread Xeno Amess
> changing the minimum Java version in a point release doesn't seem right. agreed. Mark Thomas 于2022年1月31日周一 20:42写道: > On 27/01/2022 22:29, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. > > > >[ ] +1 Release

[jackson-user] support Path in JsonFactory?

2022-01-24 Thread Xeno Amess
Hi. Is there any reason not support Path in JsonFactory and ObjectMapper? If not, then I would provide a pr when I have time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: CI red

2022-01-18 Thread Xeno Amess
I see the icons. They are travis ci badges... Should be removed when we abandon travis ci XenoAmess From: Xeno Amess Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:13:50 PM To: dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Re: CI red at which repo? XenoAmess

Re: CI red

2022-01-18 Thread Xeno Amess
at which repo? XenoAmess From: Gary Gregory Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:41:51 PM To: Apache Logging Developers List Subject: CI red We have red CI builds all the time. Why? I don't really care but I see that the GitHub portions of the builds are green all

Re: Code Formatter?

2022-01-13 Thread Xeno Amess
and it uses eclipse formatter to file, so I do think you can export&import Eclipse config file Xeno Amess 于2022年1月13日周四 17:54写道: > try this: > > net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin:2.17.1 > > It worked well in my team for 2 years, never cause any trouble. > &g

Re: Code Formatter?

2022-01-13 Thread Xeno Amess
try this: net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin:2.17.1 It worked well in my team for 2 years, never cause any trouble. Gary Gregory 于2022年1月13日周四 17:36写道: > I am ok with formatting code but I want to do it in Eclipse. I did not even > notice the POM was changed. I would think it bet

Re: ActiveMQ 5.17 and log4j2

2022-01-03 Thread Xeno Amess
well log4j1 has its own vulnerabilities too. Xeno Amess 于2022年1月4日周二 02:09写道: > he is complaining about this > [image: image.png] > > JB Onofré 于2022年1月4日周二 02:03写道: > >> I don’t understand. >> >> Again ActiveMQ 5.16 is NOT impacted by log4shell. >> >

Re: ActiveMQ 5.17 and log4j2

2022-01-03 Thread Xeno Amess
18:00 > > À : dev@activemq.apache.org > > Objet : Re: ActiveMQ 5.17 and log4j2 > > > > Log4j2 is only impacted, not log4j 1.x. > > > > It's what I meant: ActiveMQ 5.16.x/5.15.x are not affected by log4shell > vulnerability. > > > > Regards &g

Re: ActiveMQ 5.17 and log4j2

2022-01-03 Thread Xeno Amess
Just show the log4j2 cve list to that customer, and persuade him no hurry to migrate. XenoAmess From: JB Onofré Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 11:31:30 PM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.17 and log4j2 About 5.16 no way: it’s log4j 1.x And lo

Re: [VOTE] CVE creation process

2022-01-03 Thread Xeno Amess
oting procedure... Xeno Amess 于2022年1月3日周一 23:39写道: > +0 > > I just worried several things. > > 1. Will it make the cve's fix come out more slowly? > A vote means waiting for 72 hours usually. > > 2. Do all PMC who enter the vote always have enough ability and know

  1   2   3   4   >