[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff
Brian : Here is the output i get when i want to install imagemagick on a ubuntu gutsy server aptitude install imagemagick Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Fait Building tag database... Fait The following NEW packages will be automatically installed: defoma fontconfig fontconfig-config ghostscript gsfonts hicolor-icon-theme libatk1.0-0 libatk1.0-data libcairo2 libcroco3 libcupsimage2 libdatrie0 libdjvulibre15 libdrm2 libfontconfig1 libfontenc1 libfreetype6 libfs6 libft-perl libgd2-noxpm libgl1-mesa-glx libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-data libgraphviz4 libgs8 libgsf-1-114 libgsf-1-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-bin libgtk2.0-common libice6 libjasper1 libjpeg62 liblcms1 libltdl3 libmagick10 libopenexr2ldbl libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libpaper-utils libpaper1 libpcre3 libpixman-1-0 libpng12-0 librsvg2-2 libsm6 libthai-data libthai0 libtiff4 libttf2 libwmf0.2-7 libxaw7 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxdamage1 libxfixes3 libxfont1 libxft2 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxml2 libxmu6 libxpm4 libxrandr2 libxrender1 libxslt1.1 libxt6 libxtrap6 libxtst6 libxv1 libxxf86dga1 libxxf86misc1 libxxf86vm1 psfontmgr sgml-base shared-mime-info ttf-dejavu ttf-dejavu-core ttf-dejavu-extra x-ttcidfont-conf x11-session-utils x11-utils x11-xfs-utils x11-xserver-utils xdg-utils xfonts-encodings xfonts-utils xml-core xsltproc xutils xutils-dev Regards, -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
Alexander, surely not a firefox bug, but yes it is a firefox only directly related wish (and not any workaround theme issue)... By providing the qt backend for kde, it will more integrated in this desktop environment (file dialog, etc...) Cheers ! -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
Alexander, surely not a firefox bug, but yes it is a firefox only directly related wish (and not any workaround theme issue)... By provide the qt backend for kde, it will more integrated in this desktop environment (file dialog, etc...) Cheers ! -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257681] [NEW] gtk apps ugly on kde, a perhaps simple solution
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kubuntu-kde4-desktop Hi all ! Lot of people complains about the uglyness of the gtk apps in kubuntu desktop. I have just discovered (and was surprised) than by just selecting a theme (glossy for example) in the gnome control center, the result is very great in kde, much more than with the use of other workarounds like gtk-qt-engine packages. I think than theme that are clone of the oxygen exist in gnome-looks.org and i wonders why kubuntu just not apply by default one of this clone theme from gtk apps or just the glossy one. I can now use xchat, firefox gimp in kde and have a pleasant looking experience with it. Could we just add a minimal dependencies package (should be possible to not to install the control center, just the theme to apply ?) for that with kubuntu-desktop ? Cheers !! ** Affects: kubuntu-kde4-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gtk apps ugly on kde, a perhaps simple solution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254881] [NEW] [security = domain] 100% cpu after a reboot of the PDC
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba We have a NAS with a Ubuntu samba server (Hardy amd 64 bits) who authenticate the user by using the security domain mode. The PDC of the domain is a windows server 2003 and have to reboot one time a week. After each reboot of the PDC, little samba seems to lost his babies and we can't reach him anymore. We have to manually reboot him !!! I think this bug is very critical... Thanks for any helps ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [security = domain] 100% cpu after a reboot of the PDC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects
Feisty is more than two years ago... Perhaps perfomance problems have been resolved in xorg upstream and this unofficial patch doesn't is relevant anymore... This cause a really big issue for all the kde users. Thanks to take care of us. Cheers !! -- momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects
Why kde should workaround, against an unofficial old patch that its used only in the ubuntu kernel (if i well understand the creator itself, fedora, doesnt use the patch anymore) . Dont we know really what it does now ? Cheers ! -- momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects
The problem is not coming from NVidia. NVidia just workaround this specific patch coming from ubuntu... This is obviously not the solution of the problem. Others cards drivers haven't a workaround for this and should not be bloated just because of one distribution. Why not just removing this old patch ? Cheers -- momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff
Hello ! basically : libx11-6 who depends itself on x11-common libx11-data etc etc a lot of packages wo are not installed on a ubuntu-server by default. Cheers -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152284] VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose Like i said here : http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568710 With the official innotek package for feisty the seamless mode put the taskbar of the virtualized machine (windows XP) above my kde taskbar. I have installed Gutsy and the ose version of virtualbox and now the seamless mode hide the kde TaskBar with the windows XP taskbar. Is there any solution to resolve the problem ? Thanks P.S : In fact the ideal solution is that the fullscreen mode hitself dont hide the TaskBar, since it's easy to switch desktop with the multiDesktop on wm in linux ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar
I would say too that VirtualBox is THE killer feature to help users in my company (whose i am an admin) to switch to linux the less difficulty possible. For this an usage of VirtualBox the most friendly possible for end-users should be an priority and this why i think that's it can be considered like a bug and would be great if it will be fixed for gutsy release. In this way the ideal solution is to have the fullscreen mode hitself above the kde taskbar (if you have multiple desktop you put the virtual machine in one of them and only it and don't care of seamless mode in this desktop). Thanks ! -- VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar
Perhaps other users don't agree with my mind for the fullscreen mode (a fullscreen mode should be in really fullscreen) and it's why i have report the bug for seamless mode : by minimum it's important to have seamless mode above the taskbar. Sorry for multiple comments... -- VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar
** Tags added: seamless virtualbox virtualbox-ose -- VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hides kde task bar
Yes i confirm that with the official innoteck package (from virtualbox.org), the seamless mode don't hide the KDE taskbar. The Taskbar of the Virtualized Machine is just on the top of my Kunbuntu host Task bar. The situation is different with ose version : The VM Taskbar (in fact i have just try with windows XP) hide my KDE Taskbar (i don't know for Gnome). To reproduce the "bug" (in fact i think that's just a nasty problem of configuration, but it should be resolved) : install virtualbox-ose, create a VM and install Windows XP SP2 on it, install the addition client. Activate the seamless mode and enjoy to have loose your Kubuntu taskbar :op. Of course you can reactivate it by doing some advised click but it's not user friendly... Thanks ! -- VirtualBox seamless mode hides kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] [NEW] firefox3 is ugly on kde
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. Is there a way to solve the probleme ? ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: firefox3 kde ugly ** Summary changed: - firefox3 ugly kde + firefox3 is ugly on kde ** Tags added: firefox3 kde ugly -- firefox3 is ugly on kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205154] Re: [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61380] Re: Netgear WG311T unrecognised after upgrade
Seems to work for me with hardy : 2.6.24-15-generic #1 SMP Tue Apr 8 00:33:51 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- Netgear WG311T unrecognised after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205154] Re: [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager
seems to work now for me -- [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] [NEW] set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree hello i have upgrade my flashplugin-non free package, and in same time of lot of other packages in hardy, so between the download of the package and the installation i have lost my network access because of the hal upgrade who temporaly disconnect the network interfaces. So the install script fails to download the remote file of flash on the adobe site. Such things appends too if proxy settings is not correcly configured. Is it possible to set the flashplugin-nonfree package not correctly configured in such case (download of flash failed) so aptitude can retry the installation an other time ? Thanks BR ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail
hello :) here is the procedure : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install flashplugin-nonfree Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Lecture de l'information d'état étendu Initialisation de l'état des paquets... Fait Construction de la base de données des étiquettes... Fait Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants vont être installés : flashplugin-nonfree 0 paquets mis à jour, 1 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de télécharger 18,4ko d'archives. Après dépaquetage, 168ko seront utilisés. Écriture de l'information d'état étendu... Fait Prendre :1 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/multiverse flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.124.0ubuntu1 [18,4kB] 18,4ko téléchargés en 0s (42,9ko/s) ### Here i manually shutdown my network interface to simulate networks problems, same things happen when proxy settings is not correctly configured ### Préconfiguration des paquets... Sélection du paquet flashplugin-nonfree précédemment désélectionné. (Lecture de la base de données... 217053 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.) Dépaquetage de flashplugin-nonfree (à partir de .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.124.0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Paramétrage de flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu1) ... Downloading... --00:44:23-- http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz => `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' Résolution de fpdownload.macromedia.com... échec: Nom ou service inconnu. download failed The Flash plugin is NOT installed. Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Lecture de l'information d'état étendu Initialisation de l'état des paquets... Fait Écriture de l'information d'état étendu... Fait Construction de la base de données des étiquettes... Fait ### Here i manually restart my network interface ### [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude -f install Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Lecture de l'information d'état étendu Initialisation de l'état des paquets... Fait Construction de la base de données des étiquettes... Fait Aucun paquet ne va être installé, mis à jour ou enlevé. 0 paquets mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de télécharger 0o d'archives. Après dépaquetage, 0o seront utilisés. Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Lecture de l'information d'état étendu Initialisation de l'état des paquets... Fait Construction de la base de données des étiquettes... Fait As a result i have the package installed and not working. It would be great if in such case the package is automatically tagged as missconfigured so that dpkg --configure -a could retry to download the tar.gz file from macromedia website an other time. Best Regards -- set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install
** Summary changed: - set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail + Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install -- Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde
here are some good news : http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/05/06/well-isnt-that-qt/ Perhaps we can have this for intrepid ** Summary changed: - firefox3 is ugly on kde + firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu ** Tags added: qt -- firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- firefox3 is ugly on kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200347] Re: Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 firefox3 is ugly on kde ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205804] Re: Firefox Icon on panel looks bad
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200347 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 firefox3 is ugly on kde ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 200347 Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6 -- Firefox Icon on panel looks bad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail
It just says that there is no problem except during the configuration of the package, in this line which are partially in english : Paramétrage de flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu1) ... Downloading... --00:44:23-- http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz => `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' Résolution de fpdownload.macromedia.com... échec: Nom ou service inconnu. download failed The Flash plugin is NOT installed. I repeat that i have manually shut down my network to fail the download. The installation process is good and work well. However if a network problem appears (by hardware defect or missconfiguration of things like proxy variable environment on the client) the case is not considered. sudo dpkg --configure -a as no result since the package is considered to be correctly installed. However the flash plugin are not. So the state of the package does not reflect the reality of the situation Thanks ! -- set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail
Hello John i'm very sorry for my poor english. i'm confused about the time you lose because of this. the problem (and it's a minor one) is not about the flash plugin himself. it's work well on my hardy I talk about the .deb package and the process of the configuration/installation. During the configuration/installation of the .deb there is a script who download the adobe official tar.gz of the plugin. It's work well and i have no problem with this and i have flash plugin working on firefox. I talk about the case of having network problems during the download of the .tar.gz file or having not correctly configured the proxy settings to make wget work properly. (Wget is used to download the tar.gz). In such case naturally the flash plugin can't be installed. The wish is to flag the .deb package not correctly configured in such case to let dpkg retry an other time. Actually when such things happen the package is considered correctly installed. it is not a very important request because a "aptitude reinstall flashplugin-nonfree" resolve the problem but perhaps it will be convenient for sysadmin of a desktop parc to know than in reality the package is not correctly installed. hope this can help.. Regards -- set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail
Hello John i'm very sorry for my poor english. i'm confused about the time you lose because of this. the problem (and it's a minor one) is not about the flash plugin himself. it's work well on my hardy I talk about the .deb package and the process of the configuration/installation. During the configuration/installation of the .deb there is a script who download the adobe official tar.gz of the plugin. It's work well and i have no problem with this and i have flash plugin working on firefox. I talk about the case of having network problems during the download of the .tar.gz file or having not correctly configured the proxy settings to make wget work properly. (Wget is used to download the tar.gz). In such case naturally the flash plugin can't be installed. The wish is to flag the .deb package not correctly configured in such case to let dpkg retry an other time. Actually when such things happen the package is considered correctly installed. it is not a very important request because a "aptitude reinstall flashplugin-nonfree" resolve the problem but perhaps it will be convenient for sysadmin of a desktop parc to know than in reality the package is not correctly installed. hope this can help.. Regards -- set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating
kernel 2.6.24-17 seems to me only available on proposed so for testing purpose you can perhaps remove your proposed entry in the /etc/apt/sources.list cheers -- Virtualbox OSE modules need updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
hi ! That i don't not understand it's why you don't try to detect this problem automatically and let inform the user via notification that the firmware of the disk is defect and propose him to make a "dirty" workaround. it is just few lines of code to add to the notification system (checking that the number of cycles does not increase too high). It is a major issue and even it is not directly a linux kernel or ubuntu due i think that it is to the responsability of the distrib to take care of such things when a large amount of users are touched with this. Cheers ! -- High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #338230 is marked as a duplicate of this new one. See comments for look at the workaround they are working on. ** Changed in: suse Bugwatch: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #338230 => Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #386555 Status: In Progress => Unknown -- High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
hi ! Don't understand why you change the status of this package since he does *not* speak of the kde-gtk theme (he is only a bit less ugly workaround). The wish of the topic is to provide a qt backend for firefox not to make any hack on the kde-gtk theme (which are welcome too but it is not the topic) cheers ! -- firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating
I can't found documentation of proposed repo in wiki documentation. In the french community one it is specified that is for testing purpose only and i don't think that is activated out of the box but perhaps i'm wrong. However it seems that 2.6.24-17 doesn't appear in proposed any more so i think than it has been desactivated. Cheers ! ps : are you agree to change the status of the bug to invalid to not waste the time of bug triaggers ? -- Virtualbox OSE modules need updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating
nope, it was only a suggestion in the case of the package were reverted, don't understand why i'm not seen him... Best regards -- Virtualbox OSE modules need updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
** Summary changed: - firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu + [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. - Is there a way to solve the probleme ? + Is it possible to provide a qt backend for kde users ? -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
I rename the summary and the description of the bug for clarity. Please go on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/222122 witch is not really a duplicate to speak on (the ugly too so it's cool if we can improve it) workarounds based on themes to apply on gtk or firefox but not qt native. here are the upstream talk about the subject : http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/05/06/well-isnt-that-qt/ -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222122] Re: Theme looks horrible in Kubuntu Hardy
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mozilla-firefox I'm using Kubuntu Hardy (just installed it). And while I applaud the Firefox devs for creating a Gnome theme, it looks just plain horrible in Kubuntu. The tab images don't even work right! Firefox 2.0 looked bad enough. Now, it's just plain horrid. + + edit : + You can look at Bug #193538 for a qt native solution but it is not really a duplicate. -- Theme looks horrible in Kubuntu Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. Is it possible to provide a qt backend for kde users ? + + Please go on + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/222122 witch is + not really a duplicate to speak on the (ugly too so it's cool if we can + improve it) workarounds based on themes to apply on gtk or firefox but + not qt native. -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215191] Re: [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install
** Summary changed: - Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install + [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install -- [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205154] [NEW] [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager
Public bug reported: Seems that network manager doesn't detect my netgear wg311t card. As a result i can't select the desired wireless network to connect directly by the gui frontend (with both gnome one kde one). I think that is a network-manager bug because the atheros driver works well : I have to manually configure (by editing /etc/network/interfaces file) my wireless card to access to the network. Here is the hwinfo of the product given me by lshw : description: Wireless interface product: AR5212/AR5213 Multiprotocol MAC/baseband processor vendor: Atheros Communications, Inc. Regards ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [Hardy] netgear wg311t doesn't detected by networkmanager + [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager -- [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183800] Re: cannot lock KDE 4 desktop
By default kubuntu-kde4-desktop depends on kdm (not kdm-kde4). Will kdm-kde4 replace kdm (kde3) for hardy ? If not we have to found an other solution to resolve this problem for hardy... -- cannot lock KDE 4 desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff
If i look here : http://www.imagemagick.org/script/advanced-unix-installation.php It seem possible to compile imagemagick with --without-x option : don't use the X Window System. By default, ImageMagick uses the X11 delegate libraries if they are available. When --without-x is specified, use of X11 is disabled. The display, animate, and import sub-commands are not included. The remaining sub-commands have reduced functionality such as no access to X11 fonts (consider using Postscript or TrueType fonts instead). Is it possible to provide an alternate "imagemagick-nox" package for hardy using this option ? BR -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde
Note that the request is not to have better support of gtk in kde4 (which is an other problem and could help as workaround) but to have a specific firefox-qt package who use qt for backend in firefox3 like it is already done with aqua on mac os gtk on gnome and windows api on windows... Perhaps this request may have a better place in upstream bugzilla ?! -- firefox3 is ugly on kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde
Since Mozilla Corp has decided to create specific platforms backend's themes and use the platform api directly for the gui, the result is that firefox3 linux theme render is very ugly on kde, because firefox use the one they have made for gnome... And the render is "catastrophic"... Firefox 2 don't have the same problem because of the unified theme. Perhaps it is a compliant more than a real bug but i think that's this problem is very annoying for all kde users who like using firefox. For me it is a feature request : add kde support to firefox3. I have thinked that feature request are welcome on this site ?! Best regards, and sorry for my poor english -- firefox3 is ugly on kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102105] Re: dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
It will very convenient to have the /etc/profile.d working like this. I need this to adjust properly proxy settings in different networks environments. Will this commited for hardy ? Thanks ! -- dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102105] Re: dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
sorry for the inconvenience, it is already done. :op -- dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 200347] Re: Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 193538 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 Caroline Ford wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 193538 *** > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 > > ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 193538 >firefox3 is ugly on kde > > Hi caroline I'm reporter of bug 193538 I've just received two mails to inform me that both https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205804 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 have been marked a duplicate of bug 193538 I don't think that is the same problem I talk about the ugly interface of firefox in both kde and kde4. and this bug report problem only with the icon displayed in the kde4 taskbar not with the gui. However i can confirm this bug too. But i think this problem become from plasma on kde4 and not firefox. Best regards Loic -- Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199418] [NEW] imagemagick depends on x stuff
Public bug reported: Hello i have installed mediawiki on my ubuntu hardy server and need imagemagick to have the convert program. However imagemagick depend on lot X11 stuff and i think that's not good for a server. We should have a way to have basics imagemagick tools who do non depends on x integrated in a separate package. Best regards ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
