[Bug 378429] [NEW] udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
Public bug reported:
I've discovered recently that I can't get my hard disks properly
identified by udev. I did not notice this earlier as it was working
until I tried to upgrade to 9.04 Intrepid (which failed for other
reasons causing rollback). The system originated from 7.10 from which I
upgraded until 9.04.
I tried live-cd's of 7.10, 8.04 and 8.10; none of these contain udev
which would create /dev/disk/by-uuid directory and UUID entries within.
The only directories I can find are /dev/disk/by-path and /dev/disk/by-
id.
I have fakeraid configuration and the missing /dev/disk/by-uuid/
directory appears when I install dmraid. However the directory is gone
after reboot. The only way to refer to disks is to use /dev/mapper/xxx
notation.
My mobo is asus m2n which contains NVIDIA nForce 430 circuit. I've 4
identical sata disks which are in fakeraid 0+1 configuration. Below is a
snapshot of udevadm info (on 8.04, 2.5.24-24 kernel):
r...@home-ws1:/# udevadm info --attribute-walk -n /dev/disk/by-id/ata-
WDC_WD2500AAJS-00VTA0_WD-WMART1409195
Udevinfo starts with the device specified by the devpath and then
walks up the chain of parent devices. It prints for every device
found, all possible attributes in the udev rules key format.
A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
and the attributes from one single parent device.
looking at device '/block/sdc':
KERNEL=="sdc"
SUBSYSTEM=="block"
DRIVER==""
ATTR{dev}=="8:32"
ATTR{range}=="16"
ATTR{removable}=="0"
ATTR{size}=="488397168"
ATTR{stat}==" 1230018464 494003804321234718560 247632
153328044472 233816"
ATTR{capability}=="12"
looking at parent device
'/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0':
KERNELS=="2:0:0:0"
SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi"
DRIVERS=="sd"
ATTRS{device_blocked}=="0"
ATTRS{type}=="0"
ATTRS{scsi_level}=="6"
ATTRS{vendor}=="ATA "
ATTRS{model}=="WDC WD2500AAJS-0"
ATTRS{rev}=="01.0"
ATTRS{state}=="running"
ATTRS{timeout}=="30"
ATTRS{iocounterbits}=="32"
ATTRS{iorequest_cnt}=="0x605b"
ATTRS{iodone_cnt}=="0x605b"
ATTRS{ioerr_cnt}=="0x0"
ATTRS{modalias}=="scsi:t-0x00"
ATTRS{evt_media_change}=="0"
ATTRS{queue_depth}=="1"
ATTRS{queue_type}=="none"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2/target2:0:0':
KERNELS=="target2:0:0"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2':
KERNELS=="host2"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1':
KERNELS==":00:08.1"
SUBSYSTEMS=="pci"
DRIVERS=="sata_nv"
ATTRS{vendor}=="0x10de"
ATTRS{device}=="0x03f6"
ATTRS{subsystem_vendor}=="0x1043"
ATTRS{subsystem_device}=="0x8234"
ATTRS{class}=="0x010485"
ATTRS{irq}=="23"
ATTRS{local_cpus}=="03"
ATTRS{modalias}=="pci:v10DEd03F6sv1043sd8234bc01sc04i85"
ATTRS{numa_node}=="-1"
ATTRS{enable}=="1"
ATTRS{broken_parity_status}=="0"
ATTRS{msi_bus}==""
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00':
KERNELS=="pci:00"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
=
The kernel info
Linux home-ws1 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:11:35 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
=
Version signature
Ubuntu 2.6.24-24.53-generic
=
System info
r...@home-ws1:/# sudo lspci -vnvn
00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller
[10de:03ea] (rev a1)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:8234]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort-
Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [b8] Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
[10de:cb84]
Capabilities: [8c] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping
00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio
[10de:03f0] (rev a2)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:8234]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [40] Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
[10de:]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queu
[Bug 378429] Re: udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
Here is info == ># lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 Codename: hardy ># dpkg-query -W udev udev117-8ubuntu0.2 ># ls -la /etc/udev/rules.d total 173 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1384 2009-06-09 21:58 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 104 2009-04-16 18:34 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 400 2008-04-11 15:23 05-options.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 191 2008-04-11 15:23 05-udev-early.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3215 2008-04-11 15:23 20-names.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 119 2008-04-11 15:23 30-cdrom_id.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 814 2008-04-11 15:23 40-basic-permissions.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3109 2008-04-11 15:23 40-permissions.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root30 2008-02-26 20:25 45-fuse.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34568 2008-04-10 19:24 45-libmtp7.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2656 2008-03-18 01:34 50-libpisock9.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6661 2008-03-30 08:43 50-xserver-xorg-input-wacom.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3072 2009-01-24 02:48 52_nut-usbups.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 980 2008-04-15 19:36 55-hpmud.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1431 2008-04-11 15:23 60-persistent-input.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3468 2008-04-11 15:23 60-persistent-storage.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1222 2008-04-11 15:23 60-persistent-storage-tape.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 649 2008-04-11 15:23 60-symlinks.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 411 2008-04-11 15:23 61-persistent-storage-edd.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 775 2008-05-26 01:00 70-persistent-cd.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 562 2009-01-18 22:33 70-persistent-net.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 561 2008-05-25 23:11 70-persistent-net.rules~ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 390 2008-04-11 15:23 75-cd-aliases-generator.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2251 2008-04-11 15:23 75-persistent-net-generator.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 563 2008-04-11 15:23 80-programs.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 171 2008-02-27 15:21 85-alsa.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1444 2008-03-28 01:25 85-brltty.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root84 2008-03-29 00:27 85-hdparm.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 723 2008-03-25 14:24 85-hplj10xx.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 126 2008-04-15 06:36 85-hwclock.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 708 2007-09-20 03:14 85-ifupdown.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 950 2007-10-23 20:02 85-pcmcia.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3017 2008-04-11 15:23 90-modprobe.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root90 2008-04-21 23:14 95-hal.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 233 2008-04-11 15:23 95-udev-late.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1224 2008-04-11 15:23 README ># ls -la /lib/udev/rules.d ls: cannot access /lib/udev/rules.d: No such file or directory >a# ls -la /lib/udev total 338 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 832 2009-04-16 18:34 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 5480 2009-06-23 21:11 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12376 2009-04-15 00:44 ata_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11240 2009-04-15 00:44 cdrom_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 499 2008-03-30 08:42 check_driver -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7280 2008-10-27 13:39 check-mtp-device -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 497 2008-10-27 13:39 check-ptp-camera -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19560 2009-04-15 00:44 create_floppy_devices drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 408 2009-04-16 18:34 devices -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11088 2009-04-15 00:44 dvb_device_name -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13376 2009-04-15 00:44 edd_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 15200 2009-04-15 00:44 firmware_helper -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5525 2008-03-29 00:27 hdparm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12104 2009-04-15 00:44 ide_media -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11889 2009-04-15 00:44 path_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11144 2007-10-23 20:02 pcmcia-check-broken-cis -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21664 2007-10-23 20:02 pcmcia-socket-startup -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16520 2009-04-15 00:44 pnp_modules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2357 2009-04-15 00:44 rule_generator.functions -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32224 2009-04-15 00:44 scsi_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 620 2008-09-26 15:43 set_hwclock -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10976 2009-04-15 00:44 usb_device_name -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20016 2009-04-15 00:44 usb_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16872 2009-04-15 00:44 vio_type -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 15624 2009-04-15 00:44 vol_id -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16664 2009-04-15 00:44 watershed -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2561 2009-04-15 00:44 write_cd_rules -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3079 2009-04-15 00:44 write_net_rules Br Pekka -- udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378429] Re: udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
Here is udevadm output (see attachment) Br Pekka ** Attachment added: "udevadm.info" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29156386/udevadm.info -- udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Hello I can confirm that for 2.6.32-20-generic kernel the "dmraid -ay" made raid volumes active. I did not try to continue booting though. However before I managed to get initramfs boot I needed to edit grup "menu.lst" by hand. The maintainers version was faulty i.e. root (hd0,0) --> should be (hd0,2) and initrd row was missing completely I tried also the old kernel version (from 804 LTS) (grups backup option) but there dmraid -ay did not work. Finally, I could not get decently out from initramfs and continue booting. Normal "exit" did not work but initramfs complained that raid partition was missing ... Br Pekka On 11.4.2010 23:39, Phillip Susi wrote: > This is probably a duplicate of bug #534743. Can you try booting with > the nosplash break nodmraid options, then when you hit the busybox > prompt, run dmraid -ay then exit. If the system boots up normally at > that point then it's that bug and I will mark this as a duplicate. > > > ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] [NEW] Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dmraid I tried to upgrade from 8.04 LTS (up to date 10-04-11) to 10.04 (Beta). Upgrade fails as system could not read root partition. My configuration at 8.04 is using dmraid with 0+1 configuration and with nVidia chip. Apparently the upgrade procedure didn't include support for dmraid but after upgrade + reboot the system failed and falled back to init-ram-fs prompt. I didn't try further but I guess I would have managed to install dmraid manually later. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 11 17:55:45 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ath_hal Package: dmraid 1.0.0.rc14-0ubuntu3.1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: dmraid Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic x86_64 ** Affects: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43796750/Dependencies.txt -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378429] Re: udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
Hi,
I tried to upgrade to 10.04 LTS beta but upgrade failed miserably.
Upgrade didn't detect dmraid and as consequence didn't come up after
reboot. I downgraded back to 8.04 LTS ...
See bug #560748
Br Pekka
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 20:51 +, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Can you test with Karmic or a Lucid Beta? 8.04 is quite old now so this
> has probably been fixed.
>
> --
> udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378429
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “dmraid” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> I've discovered recently that I can't get my hard disks properly identified
> by udev. I did not notice this earlier as it was working until I tried to
> upgrade to 9.04 Intrepid (which failed for other reasons causing rollback).
> The system originated from 7.10 from which I upgraded until 9.04.
>
> I tried live-cd's of 7.10, 8.04 and 8.10; none of these contain udev which
> would create /dev/disk/by-uuid directory and UUID entries within. The only
> directories I can find are /dev/disk/by-path and /dev/disk/by-id.
>
> I have fakeraid configuration and the missing /dev/disk/by-uuid/ directory
> appears when I install dmraid. However the directory is gone after reboot.
> The only way to refer to disks is to use /dev/mapper/xxx notation.
>
> My mobo is asus m2n which contains NVIDIA nForce 430 circuit. I've 4
> identical sata disks which are in fakeraid 0+1 configuration. Below is a
> snapshot of udevadm info (on 8.04, 2.5.24-24 kernel):
>
> r...@home-ws1:/# udevadm info --attribute-walk -n
> /dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD2500AAJS-00VTA0_WD-WMART1409195
>
> Udevinfo starts with the device specified by the devpath and then
> walks up the chain of parent devices. It prints for every device
> found, all possible attributes in the udev rules key format.
> A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
> and the attributes from one single parent device.
>
> looking at device '/block/sdc':
> KERNEL=="sdc"
> SUBSYSTEM=="block"
> DRIVER==""
> ATTR{dev}=="8:32"
> ATTR{range}=="16"
> ATTR{removable}=="0"
> ATTR{size}=="488397168"
> ATTR{stat}==" 1230018464 494003804321234718560
> 247632 153328044472 233816"
> ATTR{capability}=="12"
>
> looking at parent device
> '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0':
> KERNELS=="2:0:0:0"
> SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi"
> DRIVERS=="sd"
> ATTRS{device_blocked}=="0"
> ATTRS{type}=="0"
> ATTRS{scsi_level}=="6"
> ATTRS{vendor}=="ATA "
> ATTRS{model}=="WDC WD2500AAJS-0"
> ATTRS{rev}=="01.0"
> ATTRS{state}=="running"
> ATTRS{timeout}=="30"
> ATTRS{iocounterbits}=="32"
> ATTRS{iorequest_cnt}=="0x605b"
> ATTRS{iodone_cnt}=="0x605b"
> ATTRS{ioerr_cnt}=="0x0"
> ATTRS{modalias}=="scsi:t-0x00"
> ATTRS{evt_media_change}=="0"
> ATTRS{queue_depth}=="1"
> ATTRS{queue_type}=="none"
>
> looking at parent device
> '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2/target2:0:0':
> KERNELS=="target2:0:0"
> SUBSYSTEMS==""
> DRIVERS==""
>
> looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1/host2':
> KERNELS=="host2"
> SUBSYSTEMS==""
> DRIVERS==""
>
> looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:08.1':
> KERNELS==":00:08.1"
> SUBSYSTEMS=="pci"
> DRIVERS=="sata_nv"
> ATTRS{vendor}=="0x10de"
> ATTRS{device}=="0x03f6"
> ATTRS{subsystem_vendor}=="0x1043"
> ATTRS{subsystem_device}=="0x8234"
> ATTRS{class}=="0x010485"
> ATTRS{irq}=="23"
> ATTRS{local_cpus}=="03"
> ATTRS{modalias}=="pci:v10DEd03F6sv1043sd8234bc01sc04i85"
> ATTRS{numa_node}=="-1"
> ATTRS{enable}=="1"
> ATTRS{broken_parity_status}=="0"
> ATTRS{msi_bus}==""
>
> looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00':
> KERNELS=="pci:00"
> SUBSYSTEMS==""
> DRIVERS==""
>
> =
>
> The kernel info
> Linux home-ws1 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:11:35 UTC 2009 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> =
>
> Version signature
> Ubuntu 2.6.24-24.53-generic
>
> =
>
> System info
> r...@home-ws1:/# sudo lspci -vnvn
> 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller
> [10de:03ea] (rev a1)
> Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:8234]
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR-Latency: 0
> Capabilities: [44] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface
> Command: BaseUnitID=0 UnitCnt=17 MastHost- DefDir- DUL-
> Link Control 0: CFlE- CST- CFE-
Re: [Bug 378429] Re: udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid
On 6.4.2010 21:33, Phillip Susi wrote: > Is this still an issue for you? It seems to work fine for me in both > Karmic and current Lucid builds. > > > ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) > Status: Confirmed => Incomplete > > Hello Phillip, Yep, this can be still seen in the 8.04 LTS system. However it has never been a stopper for me as I can make the fstab definitions in "old" way i.e. /dev/sdaXYZ and these work as they should. But still there is something fishy in the sw as I can't get UUID's working, whatever I tried. Might be related to my nvidia special 1+0 raid config though, you never know. Newertheless, if I am the only one seeing this fault and you guys are happy to move one, I will be fine. But if you see this case important to trouble-shoot I do have the system here and I can provide data on your request. Br Pekka -- udev fails to create UUID's under /dev/disk/by-uuid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Yep, correct. So far the installation is stable. Raid seems to be up and structures behind /dev/disk are in place (problem reported in #378429). Br Pekka > So were you able to run dmraid -ay then exit in the initramfs busybox > and continue to boot normally after that? > > -- > Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in âdmraidâ package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: dmraid > > I tried to upgrade from 8.04 LTS (up to date 10-04-11) to 10.04 (Beta). > Upgrade fails as system could not read root partition. > My configuration at 8.04 is using dmraid with 0+1 configuration and with > nVidia chip. > Apparently the upgrade procedure didn't include support for dmraid but > after upgrade + reboot the system failed and falled back to init-ram-fs > prompt. I didn't try further but I guess I would have managed to install > dmraid manually later. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: amd64 > Date: Sun Apr 11 17:55:45 2010 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ath_hal > Package: dmraid 1.0.0.rc14-0ubuntu3.1 > PackageArchitecture: amd64 > ProcEnviron: > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: dmraid > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic x86_64 > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/560748/+subscribe > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
I waited at initramfs prompt for 5 - 10 minutes, didn't give any commands, then I tried to exit. This fails basically stating that root device is not there. Which is of course true as it should come up with dmraid. So, with giving explicitly the command dmraid -ay in initramfs the system is able to continue booting and seems to be ok from dmraid viewpoint. If no commands are given the boot is stuck in initramfs prompt. Br Pekka On 17.5.2010 22:42, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 5/17/2010 3:25 PM, Pekka Hämäläinen wrote: > >> Yep, correct. >> So far the installation is stable. Raid seems to be up and structures >> behind /dev/disk are in place (problem reported in #378429). >> > I don't think you understood my question. Every time you boot, do you > get dropped to the busybox shell and have to run dmraid -ay then exit to > continue? If so, are you sure you have to run dmraid -ay, or have you > tried to just wait a moment, then exit without running dmraid and see if > the system boots at that point? > > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584621] [NEW] package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: I have tried upgrade from 8.04 -> 10.04. As the header says the libpam package fails to upgrade. Security system is configured to use ldap. System is amd_64. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-27.68-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wlan_ccmp wlan_scan_sta fglrx ath_rate_sample ath_pci wlan ath_hal Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 23 16:55:20 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584621] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975819/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975820/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975821/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975822/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975823/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975824/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48975825/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584628] [NEW] package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree I have tried upgrade from 804 to 1004, flash-plugin upgrade fails ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: flashplugin-installer (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-27.68-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wlan_ccmp wlan_scan_sta fglrx ath_rate_sample ath_pci wlan ath_hal Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 23 19:32:05 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: no package named `flashplugin-installer' is installed, cannot configure SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree Title: package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584628] Re: package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976215/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976216/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976217/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976218/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976219/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976220/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584623] [NEW] package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree I have tried upgrade from 804 to 1004, flash-plugin upgrade fails ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-27.68-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wlan_ccmp wlan_scan_sta fglrx ath_rate_sample ath_pci wlan ath_hal Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 23 19:36:41 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration. SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree Title: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584623] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976071/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976072/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976073/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976074/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976075/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976076/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48976077/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.262.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] Re: Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS fails: apt post-installation failure - getent returns a non-existent admin user when external authentication is used (i.e LDAP)
So farthe fix is Ok. - I took the karmic backup dump (from which the initial upgrade to lucid failed) and rolled back to that - I added karmic-proposed to updates - I selected python-apt, update-manager-core and update-manager from karmic-proposed - I updated the above - then I selected upgrade to lucid, no problems related to apt / update-manager any more More testing info or testing needed by me? BTW - is the same problem also in upgrade paths like 8.04 --> 10.04?? Br Pekka -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS fails: apt post-installation failure - getent returns a non-existent admin user when external authentication is used (i.e LDAP) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Lets activate this one. Today I tried once again upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04. Upgrade was "dirty" i.e. several warnings and errors were issued, none of them were related to dmraid. Finally upgrade went through. After reboot the system started but failed to boot properly and dropped to initramfs. As with earlier trials dmraids were not active but were successfully activated with command "dmraid -ay". Clearly either dmraid or update.manager fails to set raids in active state. Please advice on how to continue testing here. Br Pekka -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] [NEW] Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I tried to upgrade my laptop (Acer WLMi5003), running Ubuntu 9.10 to Ubuntu 10.10. I tried to this two times but both times upgrade fails with following information: ___ Could not install the upgrades The upgrade is now aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bug report. E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) All files in the above mentioned directory are in the attached file, upgradeLogs.tar.bz2 Note1: My upgrade path is: 8.10-->9.04-->9.10-->10.10LTS Br Pekka ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] Re: Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails
** Attachment added: "upgradeLogs.tar.bz2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48350028/upgradeLogs.tar.bz2 -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] Re: Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails
Njah, target is of course 10.04 LTS ... sorry about confusion. Br Pekka -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] Re: Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails: apt post-installation failed with exit status 1
Ok, although bit hard as the laptop doesnt boot normally. I am running now in emergency console. When I give the command I can see the following in screen + set -e + test -f /etc/apt/trusted.gpg + dpkg --compare-versions 0.7.5.3ubuntu7 lt-nl 0.7.5.3ubuntu2 + set_apt_proxy_from_gconf + cut -d, f1 + cut -d, f4 + getent group admin + admin_user=÷ ÷ [ -n + ] ÷ [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ] ÷ [ -z ] ÷ [ -x /usr/bin/gconftool ] ÷ sudo -u + gconftool --get /system/http_proxy/use_http_proxy + use= Thats it. Br Pekka -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails: apt post-installation failed with exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579647] Re: Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails: apt post-installation failure - getent returns a non-existent admin user
Ok. Getent returns admin:x:115:+ That reminds me that I have ldap in use and all user exept root should come from server. So far ldap installation has worked i.e. in older distros and upgrades, no changes here by me specifally for this 9.10 --> 10.04 upgrade. Br Pekka -- Dist upgrade from 9.10 to 10.10 LTS fails: apt post-installation failure - getent returns a non-existent admin user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584621] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Here are the common-* files from /etc/pam.d/ directory. They are on working condition for 804. ** Attachment added: "common-all.tar.bz2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49040747/common-all.tar.bz2 -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 584621] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
I am sorry to say but I can't. The system was left after upgrade trial to so bad inconsistent state that apt / dpkg could not execute any package operations - so I loaded 804 backup dump again. I can try to run the upgrade once again from 804 to 1004 to re-produce the fault. Before that I need to remove flash-plugin which probably caused the faults to apt / dpkg. Br Pekka On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 21:42 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > Ok, I can't reproduce this in a test upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04 using > the provided config files. Can you please try running 'sh -x > /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam-runtime.postinst configure > 0.99.7.1-5ubuntu6.1' and post the resulting output? > -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1552693] Re: Radeon driver only provides 1024x768 resolution
This bug affects also me. I just upgraded from 14.04 and 16.04 (4.4.0-28-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP kernel) radeon driver offers only 1024 x 768 resolution. Hw is adm redwood xt (hd 5670) which can do 1920 x 1080 at least. I can run series of tests for you if needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552693 Title: Radeon driver only provides 1024x768 resolution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1552693/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Here are the views, see files_101001.zip ** Attachment added: "files_101001.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/560748/+attachment/1664113/+files/files_101001.zip -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642591] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
Well, I have bug 560748 open as well. What I can tell is that there exist plenty of hd space, and I can see the log generated in the console screen, somehow that is not written to disc. So either the bug above prevents the log being written or then I gave popped yet an another bug, this time in update-manager and apt and their log reporting sub-system. So, before dropping this libpam problem I would recommend that we try to get the root causes visible. Thus I need some help how to get these logs generated in first place. On 2.10.2010 2:05, Steve Langasek wrote: > Unfortunately, without any logs, I don't think there's anything we're > going to be able to do here. Please check that you have sufficient disk > space on /var for logging to happen, and if the problem recurs, please > open a new bug report. > > ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Invalid > -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
I think these are complete as such i.e. I took "dmraid -n > pla_pla.txt" and "ls - la /dev/mapper > pla_pla2.txt" which are the files in the attachment. I am not familiar with internal structures of dmraid and ubiquity. However, please let me know any detailed areas and commands, I am prepared to spend time and dig the needed data for you. E.g. anything in /proc /sys /uuid structures that would help?? On 1.10.2010 22:21, Phillip Susi wrote: > I can't tell from the screen shot if you could scroll down in the disk > selection in the installer. See if you can scroll down and see just the > nvidia_bfcdciea or nvidia_bfcdciea[1234] disks. Those are what you want > to use, not the ones with -0 or -1 in them. > > I think this boils down to Ubiquity being confused by dmraid disks. > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
BTW did you mean that I adjust the selection in the install screens? Well, that option is not available in ubiquity either. I could choose to set root to nvidia_bfcdciea3 w.o. problems but the swap partitions didn't follow the partition type setting. Swap partitions are shown correctly in nvidia_bfcdciea5 but when installer tries to continue the next screen shows that it is about to format nvidia_bfcdciea-0 and ...-1 i.e. the stripe heads; which is horribly wrong. -- Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1
I agree that lets take these problems down 1-by-1. However I remind that there was the original problem that raids were not set active in 1st place. So, before I could aproach installer I had to manually activate "dmraid .ay". And that was also the probelm with 804 -> 1004 upgrade i.e. boot sequence dropped to initramfs were manual command recovered the discs. -- Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1
A bit continuing from #33: if we assume that dmraid is working correctly, then the question is why initramfs is created during upgrade wrongly i.e. dmraid does not activate automatically OR in case of live cd - why dmraid doesn't get activated but manual command is needed to activate raids? Still, I think we have strongest leads to ubiquity right now so I agree with Phillip that lets try to nail this down from this corner 1st. BTW, it seems that UUID (bug 378429) structure is ok in 10041 - so most probably we can close that another bug during the course when we nail down this current one. -- Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063429] Re: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized
Hi, just adding two photos about failing installation; the first photo shows that installer is correctly trying to place grup on the raid root, the second one shows that instead of placing installation on the raid root it tries to address one of the raid disks - apparently it fails ** Attachment added: "Pictures.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1063429/+attachment/3664120/+files/Pictures.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063429 Title: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1063429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999838] Re: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid)
Hi - apparently my problem is more installer and fakeraid related; I've found bug #1063429 which seems exactly the problem I am experiencing. I have attached 2 photos showing how the installations fails. If needed I can dig some data from the system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999838 Title: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063429] Re: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized
Here root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# dmraid -s *** Active Set name : nvidia_bcfbcidd size : 1465191168 stride : 128 type : raid5_ls status : ok subsets: 0 devs : 4 spares : 0 /Pekka -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063429 Title: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1063429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063429] Re: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized
Ok - should I create yet another bug or do you know an existing one I could contribute? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063429 Title: Installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 x64 with Fake RAID 1 partitions not fully recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1063429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999838] Re: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid)
Anyone working on this? I could dig some info from system if there is a person who needs that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999838 Title: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999838] Re: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid)
Hi, results from bootinfo attached. ** Attachment added: "RESULTS1.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999838/+attachment/3654024/+files/RESULTS1.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999838 Title: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999838] Re: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid)
Well - actually I didn't. I specified the /dev/mapper/nvidia_bcfbcidd but installer didn't like that and instead placed installation where- ever it wanted - this time to sdd. I can re-do the installation during weekend to see where it lands this time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999838 Title: Grub install fails with raid 5 (SW-Raid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/999838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614731] Re: shutdown hangs with wlan autofs/nfs mounted homedirs
This is very painful problem and I haven't been able to find decent workaround even with days reading these posts. My system is 10.04, wifi (ath9k) and /home, and few other directories automounted. Server is still running 8.04, ldap, nfs, samba etc. There are few clients in my network and all have similar problems. So what happens on the client side is that I can boot normally, log in (using ldap uid's), and work normally with network drives. But when I try to "restart" or "shutdown" the client in gnome session, it freezes completely and never recovers. The only procedure that somehow works is to 1st log off and then shutdown / re-start I have changed wpa_ifupdown in rc0.d and rc6.d from S15.. to S34.. to postpone the network interface stoppage after unmounts should happen - however no visible difference in the behavior. Final annoying piece of information: syslog is almost empty from shutdown event related info. Hope that some-one is working on this, I could run few trials and traces when needed. ** Attachment added: "autofs_files.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/614731/+attachment/2188844/+files/autofs_files.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614731 Title: shutdown hangs with wlan autofs/nfs mounted homedirs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/614731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Ok I created an installation media for 10.04.1. When I boot with this and try to "install" I can't see any disc partitions. If I open terminal and give direct command "dmraid -ay" and then try to "install" all disc partitions are visible for selection. So, I conclude that dmraid is not able to correctly detect NVIDIA nForce 430 and activate raids which are defined there. Let me know if any traces are needed. -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Hello, Yep, I was probably too hasty to draw conclusions. This is the long version what happened. I took the normal amd_64 bit desktop distro from Ubuntu site and made usb startup disk out of that. Then I booted without any options. At point when "install" was offered I opted that and found my way until partman was supposed to show the available partitions - well nothing there. Then I booted second time and opted booting up the system w.o. install. All ok and when the system was up I opened terminal and gave "dmraid -ay" which activated raids. As third step I tried "install" from desktop - I found my way to disc partitions which were visible now - however installer didn't allow me to install the system to wanted existing partition nor it offered correctly swap. So - I could not install the system that way either. BTW deleting the raids is not a good option as my system is dual-boot and I am running win7 there. Currently the linux partitions are in unusable state. I can boot the usb startup and do the mount as described. Then I have the option to untar the 804 backup again and get to starting point. Please let me know what info you need - I am now pretty well prepared to dig into system. Br Pekka On 27.9.2010 18:06, Phillip Susi wrote: > I'm not sure why you came to that conclusion. If dmraid -ay said it > found and activated an array, and then you were able to see it in the > installer, then it DID activate the array. The question is, why didn't > it to so automatically? You aren't booting with the nodmraid option are > you? > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1
Hello Philip, lets discuss whether it makes sense - I finally made the decision to roll - over my dual-boot (win7/ubuntu) system and I installed raid 5 instead of raid 0 + 1. At this time I could install ubuntu 10.04 without problems. So, I am definite that since 8.04 all the way to 10.04 raid 0+1 support deteriorated. At what exact point, that I can't say. Please remember, this is nvidia 430 chip so the raid 0 + 1 is nvidia specific. Is there still something that you need me to look in my working 10.04 raid 5 system? Br Pekka On 7.3.2011 3:05, Phillip Susi wrote: > Pakka, can you post the output of sudo blkid? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 Title: Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703348] [NEW] package software-center 1.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center no extra info ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jan 15 19:57:03 2011 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: software-center 1.0.3 PackageArchitecture: all ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-22.70-generic SourcePackage: software-center Title: package software-center 1.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-22-generic x86_64 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703348 Title: package software-center 1.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703348] Re: package software-center 1.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703348 Title: package software-center 1.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700479] Re: ubiquity crashed with AttributeError in debconffilter_done()
** Description changed: ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700479 Title: ubiquity crashed with AttributeError in debconffilter_done() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663073] [NEW] package postgrey 1.31-2 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg 804 --> 10041, amd64 system - local mail server is configured and postgrey within that - no fancy tweaks in postgrey config to my knowledge ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postgrey 1.31-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.79-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Oct 19 05:47:15 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: package postgrey is already installed and configured PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package postgrey 1.31-2 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package postgrey 1.31-2 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663073] Re: package postgrey 1.31-2 failed to install/upgrade:
-- package postgrey 1.31-2 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1
Ok, seems that this is dead end. Too rare configuration to generate interest to be fixed. As result though Ubuntu 10.04.1 is completely un- installable for nvidia 430 raid0+1 systems and also clear downgrade as this configuration is working in 8.04. I feel frustrated and need to start investigating other OS'es and HW ... -- Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when using dmraid 0+1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Hello I tried upgrade from 8,04 to 10.04 again (latest fixes) w.o luck. 3 problems were discovered - dmraid don't activate raids after upgrade but drops to initramfs boot. I can wait forever ... - giving dmraid -ay and exiting initramfs gets boot continuing However, upgrade was not clear either. I encounter bout fglrx and libpam-runtime problems and as result it is not easy to say which is the root cause or are these un-related events. I am bit frustrated as upgrade is still not working after 6-7 months trials and it seems that there are little interest ... -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Ok. I have loaded 804 backup again and updated that with latest corrections. So the "from state" is 804 as today. I will remove fglrx completely to avoid those problems in upgrade. ATI chip is oldish, 2600 series, but support in 804 is ok. There is separate bug-thread on this fglrx problem (642518) so I suppose there is nothing special which I have encountered here. dmraid is as follows in from state: dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc14 (2006.11.08) dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc14 (2006.11.08) device-mapper version: 4.12.0 I will now try the upgrade again. Br Pekka On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 06:06 +, Danny Wood wrote: > Packages like FGLRX wont work upon upgrade if you have a card that is not > supported by the latest version of ATIs driver. > Running unsupported pacakges will give you errors. > > I have a feeling your initramfs isn't being created properly. > > If you are able to boot can you give us the version info of dmraid? > sudo dmraid --version > > Also you can try updating the initramfs and updating grub. > sudo update-initramfs -u -k all > sudo update-grub > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Ok, some data about upgrade - fglrx removed, only libpam-runtime gave permanent error (bug 642591) - run initramfs and update-grub as suggested - dmraid version in "to state" dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) shared dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 - at boot dmraid fails to start automatically, "dmraid -ay" at initramfs promt helps - just an idea: what should be right configuration points (files) I should look for dmraid and initramfs for 10.04? These have been subject for quite changes since I started to use dmraid in this system Br Pekka On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 06:06 +, Danny Wood wrote: > Packages like FGLRX wont work upon upgrade if you have a card that is not > supported by the latest version of ATIs driver. > Running unsupported pacakges will give you errors. > > I have a feeling your initramfs isn't being created properly. > > If you are able to boot can you give us the version info of dmraid? > sudo dmraid --version > > Also you can try updating the initramfs and updating grub. > sudo update-initramfs -u -k all > sudo update-grub > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Unfortunately the system is again in "unbootable" mode i.e. I don't get login prompt at all. However the following I recorded while I still could log on: - dmraid version in "to state" dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) shared dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 - the above should be the main latest from 10.04.1 from yesterday. Does this help at all? On 22.9.2010 22:15, Phillip Susi wrote: > What version of the dmraid package do you have installed? Check with > apt-cache policy dmraid. > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Haven't had time to do that so far. Reason for trying to get this upgrade working is that I have a server which has very similar configuration as the desktop pc I am working now. I know for sure that doing fresh install for the server would kill me. On this desktop the fresh install is of course an option which shouldn't be too heavy. On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 05:24 +, Danny Wood wrote: > Are you able to do a fresh install and have it boot correctly? > (To distinguish if this is an upgrade issue or a dmraid bug) > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Ubuntu is 10.04.1, thats the latest available. I am working on burning the livecd (or usb) to see whether its upgrade or dmraid. Probably doable during weekend. On 23.9.2010 18:23, Phillip Susi wrote: > Yes, it would be good to know if it is only an upgrade issue or not. > Also you should be able to check the package version by booting from a > livecd and chrooting into the hard disk. My question is whether you got > the version in 10.04 or 10.04.1. > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
here is the data: dmraid: Installed: 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/archive.ubuntu.com/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:23 +, Phillip Susi wrote: > Yes, it would be good to know if it is only an upgrade issue or not. > Also you should be able to check the package version by booting from a > livecd and chrooting into the hard disk. My question is whether you got > the version in 10.04 or 10.04.1. > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
Ok, now I am tried the installation againg - and I can confirm that I can't proceed the installation as disks are detected wrongly. Attachment Fail100929.zip xontains two screenshots. 1.png shows the disk configuration which is in this case raid 0+1. I can set the target "/" partition as ...ciea-03, and swap should go to ...ciea-05. However, as can be seen in the second screenshot, 2.png, the swap is tried to be installed at raid roots e.g. ...ciea-0 and ciea-1 respectively. I will not go forward to wipe out the whole raid system. ** Attachment added: "Fail100929.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/560748/+attachment/1654565/+files/Fail100929.zip -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 560748] Re: Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta)
It's raid "0 + 1". I've 4 identical discs. There is stripe across the disks (raid 0) which is then mirrored (raid1). That's normal configuration for that "old" nvidia chip and called as raid 0+1 to my knowledge. As far I understand the -0 and -1 are the heads of those stripes. On 30.9.2010 19:24, Phillip Susi wrote: > What is your raid configuration? I'm trying to figure out why it shows > a -0 and -1 disk that both seem to have the same partition layout. > -- Upgrade fails from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642589] [NEW] package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: - Automatic logs included - upgrade from 8.04LTS to 10.04LTS, from state on latest correction level - lsb-release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 - amd64 system - fglrx version (in synaptic) 2.8.723.1-0ubuntu4 - upgrade failed and offered automatic bug reporting ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.79-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wlan_ccmp wlan_scan_sta fglrx ath_rate_sample ath_pci wlan ath_hal Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 19 10:06:40 2010 DkmsStatus: fglrx, 8.723.1: added ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1: MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/nvidia_bfcdciea3 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: fglrx-installer Title: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: dmi.bios.date: 09/13/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0803 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M2N dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0803:bd09/13/2007:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM2N:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.24-28-generic ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642589] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606754/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606755/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606756/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606757/+files/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog1.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606758/+files/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606759/+files/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606760/+files/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606761/+files/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606762/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606763/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606764/+files/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606765/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606766/+files/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606767/+files/UdevLog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606768/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606769/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606770/+files/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606771/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606772/+files/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606773/+files/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606774/+files/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606775/+files/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606776/+files/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606777/+files/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606778/+files/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "make.log.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606779/+files/make.log.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606780/+files/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606781/+files/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589/+attachment/1606782/+files/xkbcomp.txt -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642591] [NEW] package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: - amd64 system - upgrade from 8.04LTS to 10.04LTS, latest correction levels - lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 - libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.79-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wlan_ccmp wlan_scan_sta fglrx ath_rate_sample ath_pci wlan ath_hal Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 19 09:21:06 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642591] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591/+attachment/1606787/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgrade201009190834.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591/+attachment/1606788/+files/VarLogDistupgrade201009190834.gz -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642591] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 11:09 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and help to improve > Ubuntu. > > The VarLogDistupgrade201009190834.gz logfile attached to your bug report > is empty. Please attach /var/log/apt/term.log, which might show us > something about how this package's upgrade is failing. > > ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642591] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
Ok, here is the /var/log/apt/term.log for today Log started: 2010-09-19 07:41:32 (Reading database ... 141323 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-2.6.24-28-generic 2.6.24-28.77 (using .../linux-image-2.6.24-28-generic_2.6.24-28.79_amd64.deb) ... Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.24-28-generic ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-2.6.24-28 2.6.24-28.77 (using .../linux-headers-2.6.24-28_2.6.24-28.79_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-2.6.24-28 ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-2.6.24-28-generic 2.6.24-28.77 (using .../linux-headers-2.6.24-28-generic_2.6.24-28.79_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-2.6.24-28-generic ... Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.24-28.77 (using .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-28.79_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ... Setting up linux-image-2.6.24-28-generic (2.6.24-28.79) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-28-generic Not updating initrd symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled (2.6.24-28.77 was configured last, according to dpkg) Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled (2.6.24-28.77 was configured last, according to dpkg) Setting up linux-headers-2.6.24-28 (2.6.24-28.79) ... Setting up linux-headers-2.6.24-28-generic (2.6.24-28.79) ... Setting up linux-libc-dev (2.6.24-28.79) ... Log ended: 2010-09-19 07:42:08 Timestamps in the log gives hint that those rows are not belonging to actual upgrade but related to latest correction updates of 8.04 - just before I tried the actual upgrade. Nevertheless, thats the latest one I can find. Br Pekka -- package libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
