Hi,
I'm working with an index that contains 4,447,390 documents. The response
time for querying using facets is pretty darn slow. I'm fairly new to more
advanced Solr usage and today have started looking into the solrconfig.xml.
In the solr admin app, I noticed that the filterCache evictions were
Hi,
I'm trying to find a way to paginate through facet values. But it seems that
there is not a way to get the total number of values (numFound) under a
given facet field? For example, if I have a facet field called
"composition_era_facet" and the values are:
15th Century
16th Century
17th Centur
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to find a way to paginate through facet values. But it seems
> that
> > there is not a way to get the total number of values (numFound) under a
>
OK no problem. Thanks for explaining that to me. Actually it makes my life
easier :)
Matt
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if my facet fields (and values) a
Hi,
I've just noticed while switching connections between two different solr
instances (different servers) that their facet response structures are not
the same. But the Solr version is identical; 1.2. I've pasted in the
significant part of the response. Note the facet_fields in the first is a
Has
Just wanted to mention... the solr-ruby package has nothing to do with this.
These are responses straight out of the solr/select handler.
Matt
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just noticed while switching connections betwee
by
sorting the facet values result in in my Ruby code.
Thanks for your help Erik.
Matt
In context:
explicit
map
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanted to mention... the solr-ruby package has nothing to do with
> this. These a
