OK no problem. Thanks for explaining that to me. Actually it makes my life easier :)
Matt On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So if my facet fields (and values) are changing depending on the > > query/filters I have set, it sounds like it is not currently possible > to > > paginate through a single, facet field's values using a "total pages" > value? > > Right. > > A feature like that could be developed, but the cost is not simply a > counter... it would mean extra CPU since the current facet code > short-circuits evaluation of some facets, and that would not be > possible if one is trying to calculate that exact number. > > -Yonik >
