I (and Erik) solved my problem! It was from a setting in the solrconfig.xmlfile. Under the settings for the standard request. I ended up copying the schema from the acts_as_solr library, and didn't notice this one little change:
<str name="json.nl">map</str> That tells Solr to return the json result (or Ruby or Python) in a mapped hash. Other types are available as well. More information on this can be found here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJSON One thing that still seems to be a problem though. The sort order doesn't seem to work correctly when using the "map" (hash) type. I solved this by sorting the facet values result in in my Ruby code. Thanks for your help Erik. Matt In context: <requestHandler name="standard" class="solr.StandardRequestHandler"> <lst name="defaults"> <str name="echoParams">explicit</str> <str name="json.nl">map</str> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wanted to mention... the solr-ruby package has nothing to do with > this. These are responses straight out of the solr/select handler. > > Matt > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Matt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've just noticed while switching connections between two different solr > > instances (different servers) that their facet response structures are not > > the same. But the Solr version is identical; 1.2. I've pasted in the > > significant part of the response. Note the facet_fields in the first is a > > Hash, but in the second, a simple list. Is there a known fix for this? I've > > tried the stable solr-ruby gem and the trunk. > > > > > > 'facet_fields'=>{'recording_format_facet'=>{'LP'=>220,'Cassette'=>87,'CD'=>1,''=>34685}}}} > > > > 'facet_fields'=>{'collection_facet'=>['UVa Library Text',5396,'Art and > > Architecture',4629,'UVa Image Collection',4014,'Jackson Davis > > Collection',2996,'Chadwyk Healey Poetry',1771,'Chadwyk Healey American > > Poetry',1288,nil,4422330]}}} > > > > > > Thanks! > > Matt > > > > >
