https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950
--- Comment #2 from Quentin Armitage ---
Wow, that was quick. Many thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119501
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119967
Manuel Lauss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119967
Bug ID: 119967
Summary: mips: build faillure gcc/config/mips/mips.cc:20681:7:
error: 'is_micromips' was not declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119939
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c5cf7cc82d3a2afa5d4fb90049456be408c2a7a
commit r16-175-g1c5cf7cc82d3a2afa5d4fb90049456be408c2a7a
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119939
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57feb6afcade6b066477359bee41d071225ab499
commit r15-9594-g57feb6afcade6b066477359bee41d071225ab499
Author: Nathaniel She
head -n 1 ; for i in $(seq 1 3) ; do
gcc -O$i -W -Wall -Wextra -g -o rege regex.c -lpcre2-8 ; ./rege ; echo $? ;
done ; done
gcc-13 (Debian 13.3.0-13) 13.3.0
y_ecrc: 17994587, y_epcrc: 17994587
0
y_ecrc: 17994587, y_epcrc: 0
1
y_ecrc: 17994587, y_epcrc: 0
1
gcc-16 (GCC) 16.0.0 20250427 (experiment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119968
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-source, wrong-code
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So it looks like enabling SSE somehow forces realigning ESP.
Yes, see comment #5 the audit trail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119968
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Manuel Lauss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:947e0d1811805468116b0d497bd62779273bfa2b
commit r15-9593-g947e0d1811805468116b0d497bd62779273bfa2b
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 119939, which changed state.
Bug 119939 Summary: [modules] Constraints attached to defaulted friend
functions don't work correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119939
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119939
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119964
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|GCC 15 does not del
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 119863, which changed state.
Bug 119863 Summary: [15 Regression][modules] Bogus conflicting friend template
declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.5.0
Summary|incorrectly omitt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
Bug ID: 119969
Summary: incorrectly omitted initialization at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
$ clang++ -fsanitize=type -ggdb3 -O0 a.cxx -o a ; ./a ; echo $?
==3871530==ERROR: TypeSanitizer: type-aliasing-violation on address
0x6029869e1970 (pc 0x602986099344 bp 0x7ffd53fde640 sp 0x7ffd53fde5d0 tid
3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119970
Bug ID: 119970
Summary: [15 Regression] mingw builds fail as
libstdc++-v3/include/ostream:224:65: error: could not
convert '__out' since r16-142-g01e5ef3e8b9128
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119964
Bug ID: 119964
Summary: GCC 15 does not delete explicitly-defaulted move
constructor with (const T&&) parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
libstdc++:
[[no_unique_address]]
__detail::__maybe_present_t,
iterator_t<_Base>> _M_current;
vs libc++:
using _MaybeCurrent [[__gnu__::__no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #18 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #19 from LIU Hao ---
test.c:
```
void foo(int* p);
int bar(int x, int y) {
_Alignas(16) int t[4] = { x, y, x, y };
foo(t);
return 42;
}
```
With SSE (not default):
```
E:\lh_mouse\Desktop>gcc test.c -O2 -c -msse && objdump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118779
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
--- Comment #9 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Also to make sure my bisections are correct, after running the script
automatically, I manually checkout to the bad commit and its parent and compare
them.
My previously pasted commit was my previous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
--- Comment #5 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Bisection points at r15-988-g5316c35b13cf53
also target aarch64 as well
.L8:
add x19, x19, 8
cmp x20, x19
beq .L16
versus
.L7:
add x19, x19, 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
I think that's a bogus bisection plus that pass is only on arm64 right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
--- Comment #7 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Sorry right that's the parent commit! I pasted the wrong hash. Bisection says
r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 regression] simple |[15/16 regression] simple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> ```
> $ clang++ -fsanitize=type -ggdb3 -O0 a.cxx -o a ; ./a ; echo $?
This could still be a type sanitizer issue.
Changing PMF to any other type besides a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119968
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
uint32_t y_epcrc = 0L;
sscanf((const char *) named_buf, "%lx", (unsigned long *) &y_epcrc);
yes this code is not LP64 ready.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67797
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Patch posted:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681484.html
Newest version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681911.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #1)
> I've just noticed that there is also a 10% slowdown of 433.milc SPEC 2006
> benchmark also with -Ofast -march=native PGO. Looking at the graphs, I'd
> say these two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119965
Bug ID: 119965
Summary: [16 Regression] 531.deepsjeng_r binary is 50% bigger
since r16-116-gcfb04e0de6aa43
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119924
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dimitar at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
Bug ID: 119966
Summary: pru: Invalid register in RTL expression starting with
r16-160-ge6f89d78c1a752
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 119924, which changed state.
Bug 119924 Summary: [16 Regression] ICE when building 531.deepsjeng_r during
ipa-cp since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119924
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|pru: Invalid re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119963
Bug ID: 119963
Summary: [16 Regression
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119963
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
Soon after I reported this, the graph went to roughly the original values. So
if no one minds, I'll close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119754
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #5 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082
--- Comment #13 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
I am!!
*Luckily* nothing before 2010/1 (ie anything C++) uses this notation!
Thank you.
(godbolt.org is an interesting link, thanks.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 108694, which changed state.
Bug 108694 Summary: need a new warning option for preparing migration to ISO C23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108694
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108694
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
--- Comment #5 from Kito Cheng ---
> To double confirm, is it a mis-optimized issue instead of correctness?
Yes, That is mis-optimized issue, not correctness issue :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
noting the CWG issue, this is a tricky area since [current] tests might be
expecting either the existing clang/MSVC (and previous GCC) behaviour - or the
revised GCC behaviour.
What seems clear to me is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RISC-V: Wrong code with |[15/16 Regression] RISC-V:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117695
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #11 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||syq at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #22 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #0)
> Minimal example:
>
> typedef int myint[4] __attribute__((aligned(16)));
>
> extern void g(void *);
>
> void f(void)
> {
> myint a;
> g(&a);
> }
>
>
Would yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119951
--- Comment #3 from Chenyi Wang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> The problem is the same as PR 109267. Can you try the patch in PR 109267
> which I just attached, it is against GCC 16 but this area in the file has
> not changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916
--- Comment #11 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 61216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61216&action=edit
reduction.cpp
Probably correct reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119959
--- Comment #11 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #10)
> Dupe. See https://gitlab.com/gnu-clisp/clisp/-/merge_requests/12 too.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118779 ***
Thanks Sam, 1. for the ana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78673484b4055b93207eee0efd60a434b0bf96ab
commit r16-179-g78673484b4055b93207eee0efd60a434b0bf96ab
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Tue Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103101
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 102043 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea7b9a78b11b5ca0c85b971521144ba07a66aca
commit r16-178-gdea7b9a78b11b5ca0c85b971521144ba07a66aca
Author: LIU Hao
Date: Sun Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81191
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/cplusplu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61217
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61217&action=edit
Patch which fixes the C front-end part
Still looking into the C++ (or post this patch) part.
But at least we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
Bug ID: 119971
Summary: RISC-V: Wrong code with bitmanip extension
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119972
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119970
--- Comment #1 from LIU Hao ---
Created attachment 61218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61218&action=edit
this isn't specific to mingw, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119973
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119973
Bug ID: 119973
Summary: [15/16 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 -fipa-pta -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|16.0|15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119932
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119970
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkaminsk at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119970
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
The fails only occurs on WIN32, i.e. if defined(_WIN32) &&
!defined(__CYGWIN__).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119972
Bug ID: 119972
Summary: MacOS 10.15 profiledbootstrap fails with 15.1.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 112877, which changed state.
Bug 112877 Summary: TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES is not honored consistently,
should maybe not apply to builtins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112877
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112877
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|[15 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x96_64 |x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
100 matches
Mail list logo
