https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99997
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=110963
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> I suspect if we do something about:
> # iftmp.0_8 = PHI <0(3), 1(4)>
> _9 = (_Bool) iftmp.0_8;
>
>
> First things might just work. Let me look into that. Plus there might be an
> expand issue ...
Yes that works.
Though we already started to optimize this for GCC 14 due to
r14-3217-g4d6132e59327e8 (PR 110963).
