http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-20
08:13:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 20 08:13:21 2012
New Revision: 194628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194628
Log:
2012-12-20 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55745
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
--- Comment #4 from pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com 2012-12-20 08:45:09 UTC ---
I tried 4.7.2 as suggested and it works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20
08:51:38 UTC ---
Invalid already at gimple dump:
foo (unsigned int i)
{
* D.1723;
D.1724;
D.1725;
D.1726;
D.1723 = &arr[i].n;
D.1724 = arr[i].n;
D.1725 = D.1724;
D.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55745
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-12-20 09:04:27
UTC ---
> The bug fix is older than the bug report ;-)
No, it isn't. I was able to file it 18 minutes before your commit. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55486
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20
10:40:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 20 10:40:26 2012
New Revision: 194630
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194630
Log:
PR c/39464
* c-typeck.c (conve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20
10:41:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 20 10:41:47 2012
New Revision: 194631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194631
Log:
PR c++/55619
* c-parser.c (c_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-20
10:48:15 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 20 10:48:11 2012
New Revision: 194632
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194632
Log:
2012-12-20 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-20
11:45:56 UTC ---
The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was that
std::this_thread::sleep_for() is always available, even without
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 12:11:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was that
> std::this_thread::sleep_for() is always available, even without
> --enab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752
Bug #: 55752
Summary: __builtin_ia32_ldmxcsr / __builtin_ia32_stmxcsr are
not scheduling barriers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-12-20
12:45:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 20 12:45:48 2012
New Revision: 194633
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194633
Log:
2012-12-20 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-20
12:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was
> > that
> > std::this_thread::sleep_for()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-12-20 12:59:40
UTC ---
The RTXes that corresponds to builtins are all declared unspec_volatile.
According to the comment in sched-deps.c, around line 2723, it is assumed that
unspec_volatile clobbers al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 13:05:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was
> > > that
> > >
C='gcc -fPIC' CXX='c++ -fPIC'
CPP=cpp CXXCPP='c++ -E'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121220 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-m64' '-O2' '-std=c++11' '-c'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-12-20 13:07:20 UTC ---
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752
>
> --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-12-20
> 12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-20
13:37:47 UTC ---
The issue here is that when unswitching, we create this new bb:
;; basic block 19, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 14, maybe hot
;; prev block 20, next block 1, flags: (NEW, RTL, M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55754
Bug #: 55754
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-2.c
scan-assembler ands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55755
Bug #: 55755
Summary: Invalid VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR produced by SRA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55755
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #22 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-20 14:31:18 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Thu Dec 20 14:31:09 2012
New Revision: 194634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194634
Log:
Fix PR gcov-profile/55
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-20
14:37:03 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 20 14:36:56 2012
New Revision: 194635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194635
Log:
PR libstdc++/55741
* acinclude
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org
spawn
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20121220/Build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/daten/aranym
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757
Bug #: 55757
Summary: Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M
(Cortex-M3)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758
Bug #: 55758
Summary: LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with
-std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE
for those
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55754
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-12-20
15:20:17 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Dec 20 15:20:06 2012
New Revision: 194636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194636
Log:
2012-12-20 Andreas Krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757
--- Comment #1 from Freddie Chopin 2012-12-20
15:23:25 UTC ---
BTW - it seems that optimization settings don't make any difference here - the
code below was compiled with -Os, on all other levels (1,2,3) the assembly
looks like this:
00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55756
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
Bug #: 55759
Summary: bogus warning when building drivers/ata/libata-core.c
in v3.7 of the linux kernel
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55723
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SLP vectorization vs loop: |loop vectorization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55754
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-12-20
15:44:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This hunk needs to be reverted. op0 is modified but it is set to an equivalent
> value.
Perhaps you could update the documentation to make that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760
Bug #: 55760
Summary: scalar code non using rsqrtss and rcpss
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
Bug #: 55761
Summary: process_assignment assumes -1 can be created
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-20
15:52:31 UTC ---
Use -mrecip. It's otherwise not safe for SPEC CPU 2006 which is why it is not
enabled by default for -ffast-math.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
--- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-12-20 15:53:48
UTC ---
This happens for the negate_expr case too in the same switch.
I have a patch to fix this that I will upload momentarily.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-20 15:55:03 UTC ---
Thanks.
not safe meaning producing incorrect results?
Is it documented?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55202
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge 2012-12-20
15:57:21 UTC ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Thu Dec 20 15:57:18 2012
New Revision: 194637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194637
Log:
PR bootstrap/55202
* conf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-12-20
15:58:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks.
> not safe meaning producing incorrect results?
Yes.
> Is it documented?
See the documentation for -mrecip:
...
Note that whil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
--- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-12-20 16:01:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 29014
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29014
Use built_int_cst only for integral types, otherwise use fold_build1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55762
Bug #: 55762
Summary: Diagnostic: Passing a procedure to LEN should tell
that one has passed a procedure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-20
16:07:11 UTC ---
> is there any reason why rsqrtss and rcpss are not used for scalar code while
> rsqrtps and rcpps are used for loops?
Yep! I don't have the patience to dig the bugzill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #34 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-20 16:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Using--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan should do that for you.
Seems like I'm doing something wrong, this fails for me after configuring wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55749
--- Comment #2 from blue_3too at hotmail dot com 2012-12-20 16:17:20 UTC ---
Thanks for the comments. I checked the document @
gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html . But find no description hat
label-as-a-value should be used wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Bug #: 55763
Summary: Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55749
--- Comment #3 from blue_3too at hotmail dot com 2012-12-20 16:18:23 UTC ---
Thanks for the comments. I checked the document @
gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html . But find no description hat
label-as-a-value should be used wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
--- Comment #2 from Boris 2012-12-20 16:20:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 29015
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29015
gzipped preprocessed source of drivers/ata/libata-core.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #35 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-20
16:41:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
You might try https://github.com/mirrors/gcc/tree/hjl/asan. Perhaps H.J. still
has some patches from his branch that are not committed into gcc trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55764
Bug #: 55764
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE when building frysk
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55749
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-20
16:54:53 UTC ---
"To use these values, you need to be able to jump to one. This is done with the
computed goto statement1, goto *exp;."
> Not sure how to implement this properly.
Use either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-12-20 16:58:08
UTC ---
I created a new patch from your comment to gcc-patches:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-tailcall.c b/gcc/tree-tailcall.c
index 5b1fd2b..8c7d142 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-tailcall.c
+++ b/g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
--- Comment #5 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-12-20 17:06:04
UTC ---
As per previous comments, I looks at build_one_cst and implemented
build_minus_one_cst:
tree
build_minus_one_cst (tree type)
{
switch (TREE_CODE (type))
{
case I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757
--- Comment #3 from Freddie Chopin 2012-12-20
17:07:47 UTC ---
Indeed that's a trivial case, but other - useful - cases also show strange
behavior which I cannot clearly explain, so while we're at it I'd be grateful
for some explanation...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Bug #: 55765
Summary: Remaining issues with unlimited polymorphic (CLASS(*))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 17:31:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > Using--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan should do that for you.
>
> Seems like I'm doing something wrong, this fails for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #37 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-20
17:42:04 UTC ---
H.J.,
How are you working around PR55371 in your
--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan builds?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46308
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #38 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 17:49:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> H.J.,
>How are you working around PR55371 in your
> --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan builds?
I configure GCC with --disable-werror.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55756
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20
18:14:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 20 18:13:56 2012
New Revision: 194647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194647
Log:
PR middle-end/55750
* gimplify.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36044
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-20 18:15:19 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Dec 20 18:15:13 2012
New Revision: 194648
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194648
Log:
2012-12-20 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55371
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
--- Comment #3 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-12-20
18:21:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> After thinking about this more, I think the problem here is that the
> attributes
> specified in the declaration of the function are not being used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at google dot com
2012-12-20 18:23:55 UTC ---
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, tmsriram at google dot com
wrote:
> However, with function multiversioning, this will become a problem as
> multiversioning doe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-20 18:34:19 UTC ---
This is what creduce came up with:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat test.i
struct ata_taskfile
{
int feature;
};
struct ata_eh_info
{
int flags;
};
struct ata_eh_context
{
stru
ate
using eIF = typename std::enable_if ::type;
I encountered code where alias is not equivalent to direct use of enable_if.
Attached are good.ii (with enable_if) which both GCC480-20121220 and CLANG32
can compile, and bad.ii (with alias eIF), which only CLANG can compile.
diff good
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55766
--- Comment #1 from Leonid Volnitsky 2012-12-20
18:37:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29017
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29017
bad.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55766
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55767
Bug #: 55767
Summary: flowing off end of function which returns a value
isn't treated as an error by default
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55165
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 19:24:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> After applying your patch, I now get to the errors below any known
> workaround ?
>
> ../../gcc/libiberty/regex.c:4497: error: undefined reference to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55767
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36044
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
Ruben Van Boxem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
