pa...@pbratholm.dk wrote:
Game1: White_elo 2700 - Black_elo 2500 - year 2007
Game2: White_elo 2600 - Black_elo 2550 - year 2010
Game3: White_elo 2400 - Balck_elo 2400 - year 2010
I'm thinking about something like this:
(white_elo + black_elo) -penalty_year -penalty_elo_diff
That will give me an order of game2 - game1 - game3
Bye, Fulvio
Sure that would be better than the original, only using -penalty_year adds
what I think is unnecessary complications! Using only the year and the
elos should give the order: game2 - game3 - game1
Not necessarily better, but I think simpler!
Oh, my bad!
Let's say
Game3: White_elo 2400 - Black_elo 2400 - year 2009
i still want the order: game2 - game3 - game1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users