Benoit St-Pierre wrote:
Hi!
> I fully understand that it does not solve the problem you are
> addressing. It would merely dissolve it.
For the annotation part of theoretical lines yes. I admit that I'm quite
a fan of the tree and masks feature and would strongly recommend anyone
to look into this.
You are right in saying
> that there are some comments that deserve to stay into a single game.
> Your example shows that one would like to annotate a particular game,
> in which case it makes sense to annotate into a game. But you must
> also consider that most of theorical annotations could and should stay
> outside particular games. That would solve lots of annotating
> problems, most of mine, at least.
Of course. My masks are constantly growing. There're some minor issues
there like e.g. linking to the literature or a global search/replace in
case a tag was misspelled. (As there're no line breaks the mask files
are a bit cumbersome to handle in the editor.) And of course it would be
nice to feed the cache with the "lines" of a mask as it is likely to
come to those positions annotated again.
> That's the way of the future, in my
> humble opinion, along with strict games IDs, of course.
For the theoretical annotations, repertoir build up and so on I agree.
> I just wanted to promote a very, very interesting feature. Hijacking
> your thread seemed like less noise than writing a new one.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance,
No disturbance. ;)
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
