Actualy it is NAT. The firewall is a DL-604 D-Link DSL Router. The mail server is behind it.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 12/3/02 at 5:59 PM Mike Burger wrote: >According to what you've written, you're not actually doing NAT, but >you're simply port forwarding. > >You're firewall isn't set up to properly do MASQ from what I'm surmising. > >You need to make sure that your firewall has: > >$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > >near the top...not at the top, but after any flushing and clearing. > >On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Brent Canipe wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> I know I'm not the only one that has run into this. >> But right off hand I don't know how to fix it. >> >> I have a NAT filewall with a public IP address. >> Behind the firewall is my mail server which has a private ip address >192.168.80.30 >> The firewall is set to pass trafic for certain ports to 192.168.80.30 >> >> That part all works fine.. >> >> The problem is my outbound e-mail. >> since the mail is being reported as from a server with a private address >(192.168.80.30) >> it gets rejected by other servers around the net because the address is >non resolvable. >> >> Is there a way to tell sendmail to report a differant address? like my >firwalls address? >> >> Brent Canipe >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >Mike Burger >http://www.bubbanfriends.org > >Visit the Dog Pound II BBS >telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 > > > >-- >redhat-list mailing list >unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
