Slightly OT - For a router setup I'm in love with freesco at http://www.freesco.org.
Mike W ----- Original Message ----- From: "juaid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:52 PM Subject: Re: RH as router, not recommended?? > From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better > > for obvious reasons. > > sure > > >Other than that I can't think of any other reasons it would be better. > > great then, me neither, that's why I asked... > > >Of course, having less installed, means less to configure, and less to > worry about. Maybe some benefit there. > > I agree too > > > "Heavy"? What does that mean? > > mmhhh.. I don't know hot to say it in English... > What I meant is that if because it installs lots things that you don't use > to make your life easiear (despite the fact of selecting what packages to > install) it could have less performance, something like that.. > > thanks for your quick answer > > regards, > > juaid > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 9/30/02 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list