Slightly OT - For a router setup I'm in love with freesco at
http://www.freesco.org.

Mike W

----- Original Message -----
From: "juaid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: RH as router, not recommended??


> From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better
> > for obvious reasons.
>
> sure
>
> >Other than that I can't think of any other reasons it would be better.
>
> great then, me neither, that's why I asked...
>
> >Of course, having less installed, means less to configure, and less to
> worry about. Maybe some benefit there.
>
> I agree too
>
> > "Heavy"? What does that mean?
>
> mmhhh.. I don't know hot to say it in English...
> What I meant is that if because it installs lots things that you don't use
> to make your life easiear (despite the fact of selecting what packages to
> install) it could have less performance, something like that..
>
> thanks for your quick answer
>
> regards,
>
> juaid
>
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 9/30/02



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to