If you mean router as in firewall type box that does simple routing, take a look at ipcop (probably ipcop.org)....it's really great.
There's nothing inherently wrong with using red hat as a router, especially if you have a seperate firewall. The big advantge, which could outweight any disadvantage is if you're already used to Red Hat on your desktop/server/whatever then the learning curve is minimal. -Sam On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:52:32PM -0300, juaid wrote: > From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better > > for obvious reasons. > > sure > > >Other than that I can't think of any other reasons it would be better. > > great then, me neither, that's why I asked... > > >Of course, having less installed, means less to configure, and less to > worry about. Maybe some benefit there. > > I agree too > > > "Heavy"? What does that mean? > > mmhhh.. I don't know hot to say it in English... > What I meant is that if because it installs lots things that you don't use > to make your life easiear (despite the fact of selecting what packages to > install) it could have less performance, something like that.. > > thanks for your quick answer > > regards, > > juaid > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Sam Ockman, Chairman and CEO Tel: 415-358-2600 Fax: 415-896-6742 Toll Free: 888-PENGUIN Penguin Computing - The World's Most Reliable Linux Systems www.penguincomputing.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
