Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 07:15:45PM -0700, Shin Ji wrote:
>> Whoa!!!!!! A response.
>> 
>>  There is nothing wrong with the way I asked my
>> question.. Go back to sleep MR. Hal Burgiss. :P You
>> probably didn't even read my previous two posts
>> anyway.
>
> No, I didn't. Well, maybe I did but since you didn't quote or
> reference it, I have not the slightest idea what it was now. I don't
> know why you would assume everyone reads and then remembers every post
> that comes along. So, I either a) didn't have time b) didn't know
> anything about it c) was not interested in the subject matter d) read
> but don't remember the name e) it had a stupid subject line so I
> ignored it deliberately. 

Whoa Hal hehe,  I think Mr. Shin may be feeling a little frustration
after going back and reading his posts.  I did'nt notice them either
and can't help at all but it is an interesting problem.

You've given out so much help here, you are about the last one to be told
to `go back to sleep', but I suspect OP may not be aware of your input
here.  Well, anyway I think he just got off on the wrong foot with a
biggish problem to solve.

See message ids:
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If interested.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to