-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bill Crawford wrote:

> Well, just keep adding the missing packages onto the update command.
>There's an update for gnorpm too:

Yes, that did it, though I was greeted with a corrupt database 
afterwards.  --rebuilddb seemed to make it happy.  Glad one of us is.

> I'm surprised they did that split in the updates, because the ideal
>is that you can indeed do a "rpm -Fvh *" in your updates directory.

Yes, indeedy, like I was saying ...
                                                                            
They did the same damned thing with glibc a couple of releases ago. That
practice makes -F well-nigh useless.
                                                                                    
> All I'm saying is, if rpm didn't work that way, people would just
>cheerfully ignore the dependencies, then complain that things didn't
>work ...               

Believe me, I'm not arguing that dependencies are a bad thing.  I _am_              
arguing that _changing_ the dependency structure mid-release is not                 
amusing, and that seems to be the case here.  Again.

Cheers -d 


- -- 
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPJ/JG79BpdPKTBGtEQJztwCeJ6fKx3Opyo2tcgEqzGmSRpObbw4AoIS5
sFE0/2dZjR/MA9xPR5TikwWd
=Qvhp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to