On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, fred smith wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:20:00PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> > We have dual athlon servers running on RH7.1 and 7.2.
> > No problem at all.
> > In the old age, K6 2 and K6 3 were better faster for floating point 
> > operations compared to P2 and PIII.
> 
> At the risk of slipping off-topic, I must respectfully disagree. The 
> K6-x product line (I own four of 'em, BTW, they're nice processors for
> low priced systems) has a notoriously weak FPU. For integer work it's as
> good as a pentium of equal clock speed, but can't hold a candle to Intel's
> FPU.

 It comes fairly close.  Bearing in mind that the Intel FPU was
supposedly capable of going "twice as fast" due to pipelining, I was
interested to note that most of the published benchmarks showed the
K6-III to come in at about the same performance clock-for-clock when
running 3D games; and as you say, for integer work they're blazing.
I have a K6-III 400 which I find "feels" a lot faster than a PII 400
in my desktop at work.  And for a third of the price (when I bought
it) I call it a good deal -- that's a 3:1 price:performance ratio.
Hard to beat, I'd say.  Even allowing for the rest of the machine
the ratio was still 3:2 :o)

 Given that several reviews appear to have compared the 400MHz K6-2/3
against PIII-500 I think it held its own.  A lot of the problems were
due to most games and video drivers being optimized for the PII/PIII
and not for the AMD ... on Linux that wasn't such a problem, a lot of
Mesa code includes 3DNow! optimizations, for example.  I found that
3D games worked very well.

 All in all, I'd have to say that having the opportunity not to buy
Intel, and get pretty much the same performance for a third of the
price, is priceless.  I will endeavour not to buy Intel again.  It's
just not worth it.

 I will concede that they lost both the marketing battle and most of
the attention-grabbing benchmarks, which is a shame, as for anything
other than 3D games, the K6-III beat the PII hands down.

> Now, the Athlon, OTOH, has a FPU at least a strong as Intel's, some would
> say it's even better.

 Athlon smokes.  Really.

> Fred



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to