Take a look at autorpm. Here's the info from the rpm...
[root@ceora ssh]# rpm -qi autorpm
Name: autorpm Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version: 1.9.8.4 Vendor: Kirk Bauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Release: 2 Build Date: Sun 09 Jan 2000
05:42:32 PM MST
Install date: Fri 26 Jan 2001 02:40:23 PM MST Build Host:
ns.kaybee.org
Group: Applications/System Source RPM:
autorpm-1.9.8.4-2.src.rpm
Size: 209494 License: GPL
Packager: Kirk Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://www.kaybee.org/~kirk/html/linux.html
Summary: An RPM auto-installer and FTP site mirroring program.
Description:
The AutoRPM program can mirror RPMs from an FTP site, keep installed
RPMs consistent with an FTP site or local directory, and keep
installed RPMs in a cluster or network of systems consistent. AutoRPM
is designed to be highly flexible and provides a useful menu-driven
Interactive-Install mode.
--
John S. Weber
System Administrator
Center for Computational Mathematics
University of Colorado at Denver
Phone: (303)556-5394 Fax: (303)556-8550
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-math.cudenver.edu/~jweber
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I have had my first experience with up2date over the last day or so
> dinking with wolverine. Actually, my time was spent getting around it
>:) The interface seems to work pretty well, and the idea is probably
> sound for a lot of users although $5 US /month or what ever it is seems
> steep. ( I am speaking totally from ignorance and memory here, A very
> dangerous combination. I apologize to RedHat if this is incorrect)
>
> My concern is that due to the fact that I am a control freak and
> placeing the wellbeing even more in the hands of a third party is really
> scary to me. Especially since if you do anything to the box outside of
> up2date is does not know about it. Storing all the inforamtion at RH
> does not give me a warm and fuzzy either. How hard is it in a large
> very dynamic company that is trying to respond to very rapid changes in
> an already dynamic industry to screw up every now and then?
>
> Am I alone in this attitude? I certainly do not begrudge RedHat for
> providing a service that can be used by the masses and I hope every one
> of you subscribe so that the distribution keeps getting better, but
> I just don't feel comfortable not haveing any real idea what is going to
> happen when I type in up2date and trust that redhat still has all my
> data intact. I hate not having the time to read souce code and compie
> all my own rpms too but this approach seems to be an order of magnitude
> increase on the trust scale.
>
> I would like to hear comments from both pro and con since I am trully
> seeking other views here.
>
> Bret
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
