On 10 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> I didn't have `samba' installed and it wouldn't let me proceed so
> installed the 3 samba packages:
>       samba-2.0.7-21ssl
>       samba-common-2.0.7-21ssl
>       samba-client-2.0.7-21ssl
>
> I did share the printer but I see no provision for password there.
> The win2k box Aministrator has a password however.   So used that
>
>
> Its a complete wash out here so far.
>
> Looking at the `printtool add'
>
> Names(name1|name2...)           lp             <== what is that con-
>                                                    fusing line
>                                                    supposed to mean
>                                                    anyway?
>
This is what you want to call the printer on the Linux machine.
>
> Free limit....                  0
> Hostname of printer             192.168.xxx
> IPnumber of server              192.168.xxx
> Printer Name                    EP
>
this is the Printer share name on the W2K machine.
>
> User                            Administrator
> Password                        **********
>
The user/password are only needed if you require a password to access
the printer.  Otherwise, leave them blank.
>
> Workgroup
>
The Workgroup entry must match the workgroup of the W2K machine.
>
> Input Filter                    *auto* - U_EpsonStylusColor
>
>
> >
> > I've only done it with a Win95 printer, and therefore do not know if
> > the encrypted password issue on recent Windoze versions will bite or not.
>
> How did you manage a username on win95?
>
With Windows 95, you can leave the username/passwork blank, or use the
user/password you use when logging into Windows.
>
> When I try the menu/test  I get a message saying:  "Test page printed
> to que lp".  Tailing /var/log/messages  I see no activity related to
> printing at all.  Using `lpq'
>
>        # lpq
>       Printer: lp@reader
>        Queue: no printable jobs in queue
>        Status: job 'root@reader+662' removed at 12:08:38.638
>
> Reader is the linux host name
>
> Trying with `lpr -V':
>
[snip]
>
>
> Should this be getting sent to localhost? Given the hostnmae in the
> printtool config?
>
Yes, because it is spooled localy.  The actual sending of the job to the
remote printer is done in the print filter for a windows printer.
>
> All this and not one word shows up in syslog.  Makes it hard to debug.
>
> The lpr -D (debug) flag might be usefull here but the description of
> its use in `man lpr' is so worhtless I can't figure out how to use it.
>
You may want to read the Printing-Usage-HOWTO.
>
Mikkel
-- 

    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
 for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to