On 07-Nov-2000 lee opined:
>>
>> Hmm...no KDE2 for RH7, eh? Too bad. Guess RH is too focused
>> on pushing Gnome as the GUI of choice. Then again, KDE has
>> always been a second-class GUI as far as RedHat is
>> concerned. I'm not necessarily asking them to push it
>> HARDER than Gnome, I just wish they'd push 'em Equally. I'm
>> REALLY not trying to restart the GUI wars. I just happen to
>> have gotten used to KDE and like it better. :-)
>> John
>>
>
> well for me anyway..( PII450-seattle/128ram/RIVa TNT16mb/13.6HD ) gnome
> is
> sluggish ( on startup only I mean and its frustrating ) on FM and
> sometimes
> GNORPM..most others apps seem to load as usual......heck sometimes FM
> takes
> like 15 or more seconds just to load........similar things with GNORPM
> ( albeit
> kpackage is similar i know if must read the rpm database ) and i'd love
> to know
> why as I like Gnome...anyone else ever had these issues with
> Gnome......i'd
> heard ( although it seems unlikely?) that Gnome doesn't work well with
> newer
> processors????....i've always like the transparent console and the fact
> I can
> place windows with pixel efficiency it feels less quirky.......
I have an older processor. Gnome doesn't work well with it or the old one
I had before as well.
I'd sy (IMO) gnome doesn't work well. Period.
--
Here we are in America. When do we draw unemployment?
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
