The model of startup scripts is old, based on AT&T System V. It is used by many modern UNIX variants - SunOS 5.x ('Solaris'), HP-UX 10.x/11.x, etc. RedHat merely models this rather than the Berkeley style of startup scripts. Once you get used to it, it is more powerful and flexible than the Berkeley model. - rick warner - On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Danny wrote: > Assuming I want to install sys progs without the RPMS I was wonder why the > developers of RH have made modifying etc/rc.d so complex. > > Whereas in BSD you have to only create a file called sysprogs.sh to start the > program up. > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. > > -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Darryl Harvey
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Jason Hirsch
- Re: Linux and Win2k Jason Costomiris
- Samba & Win2K Darryl Harvey
- Re: Samba & Win2K Richard Harvey Chapman
- Re: Samba & Win2K Darryl Harvey
- Bind - Named-lint on Linux 6.2 Darryl Harvey
- Re: Bind - Named-lint on Linux 6.2 gpt Guillermo Pastor Torrente
- Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so comp... Danny
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Darryl Harvey
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Rick Warner
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Dave Reed
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Yoink!
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Gordon Messmer
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Wayne Dyer
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Philippe Moutarlier
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Bret Hughes
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Gordon Messmer
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Anthony E. Greene
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Duncan Hill