Hi Darryl, The error is in the line 403. The rest are warnings. I can't see the code but maybe some compilers (i.e. other gcc versions) would produce a warning instead of an error. > named-lint.y: At top level: > named-lint.y:403: initializer element for `yyin' is not constant anyway, "At top level" is strange here .... I don't know if maybe the error is a bit before.... -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Another change in 6.2? Darryl Harvey
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Wayne Dyer
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Darryl Harvey
- Re: Another change in 6.2? Jason Hirsch
- Re: Linux and Win2k Jason Costomiris
- Samba & Win2K Darryl Harvey
- Re: Samba & Win2K Richard Harvey Chapman
- Re: Samba & Win2K Darryl Harvey
- Bind - Named-lint on Linux 6.2 Darryl Harvey
- Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so comp... gpt Guillermo Pastor Torrente
- Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so comp... Danny
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Darryl Harvey
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Rick Warner
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Dave Reed
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Yoink!
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Gordon Messmer
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Wayne Dyer
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Philippe Moutarlier
- Re: Why does modifying /etc/rc.d have to so ... Bret Hughes