>
> Also, I've just worked through a fair bit of analysis, and there's no clear
> win with SAMBA over NFS in terms of performance; if anything, at least on
> a Sun network, it's about 10-15% behind. Nothing earthshattering. The
> security issues with NFS, and licensing costs commercially, steer me to
> SAMBA for new installations, but that's not an issue in this conversation.
>
Which adds to my point... in a strictly Windoze and Linux environment,
where one might want to keep the systems simple, use of Samba on
Linux for connecting to Windoze and other Linux boxes is, well, simpler
than NFS for Linux and Samba for Windoze.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
